Anonymous wrote:No it would not. The distance learning teacher can add in the hybrid kids at home.
Anonymous wrote:Yes 100 percent better than watching a streaming class and having the teacher’s attention split.
Anonymous wrote:No it would not. The distance learning teacher can add in the hybrid kids at home.
Anonymous wrote:You lost me at DL is going well.
Nice try, Brabrand. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t it work to have team teaching in elementary where one teacher delivers the distance learning and one the hybrid?
Anonymous wrote:I know it’s the best option now, but as someone who chose hybrid originally, I would rather not have my kids required to do any of the synchronous DL portion. I could have used our time more effectively on asynchronous days. These are early elementary kids that barely pay attention to DL unless an adult sits with them for the whole time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If this is the plan then I really wish I could just opt out of the 2 days at home.
Agree. I don’t want my child having to log in and watch a classroom. Talk about boring. I would much rather have my child working on independent work. I think the 2 days at home with concurrent instruction will be FAR worse than DL now.
Anonymous wrote:I know it’s the best option now, but as someone who chose hybrid originally, I would rather not have my kids required to do any of the synchronous DL portion. I could have used our time more effectively on asynchronous days. These are early elementary kids that barely pay attention to DL unless an adult sits with them for the whole time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not perfect, but it is possible. And most importantly, it’s a necessary step and the only path forward. Otherwise we’re stuck in 100% DL for the year, if not longer (and at this point, I do think it’ll be longer because everything is just so broken). If DL is working for you, fantastic. Stick with it. For those it is not working for, we need another option. And this is it, folks.
I’m sticking with DL and I’m like, take the damn deal people! Are you nuts?
PP here- Am I nuts? No, I’m 100% for it because it’s all we got! It’s not perfect, but nothing is right now.
Ha, no not you. I mean the people that won’t take the deal. They’re nuts.
Ah, yes, haha! Agree! Some other magical solution is not coming. TAKE THE DAMN DEAL!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not perfect, but it is possible. And most importantly, it’s a necessary step and the only path forward. Otherwise we’re stuck in 100% DL for the year, if not longer (and at this point, I do think it’ll be longer because everything is just so broken). If DL is working for you, fantastic. Stick with it. For those it is not working for, we need another option. And this is it, folks.
I’m sticking with DL and I’m like, take the damn deal people! Are you nuts?
PP here- Am I nuts? No, I’m 100% for it because it’s all we got! It’s not perfect, but nothing is right now.
Ha, no not you. I mean the people that won’t take the deal. They’re nuts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not perfect, but it is possible. And most importantly, it’s a necessary step and the only path forward. Otherwise we’re stuck in 100% DL for the year, if not longer (and at this point, I do think it’ll be longer because everything is just so broken). If DL is working for you, fantastic. Stick with it. For those it is not working for, we need another option. And this is it, folks.
I’m sticking with DL and I’m like, take the damn deal people! Are you nuts?
PP here- Am I nuts? No, I’m 100% for it because it’s all we got! It’s not perfect, but nothing is right now.