Anonymous wrote:See, this is why you don’t what to go to Maret. The parents make of 5 year olds while sayimg their kids are “super smart”
Consistent with the people I know there
Anonymous wrote:The kids who went there from NCRC for K definitely were not the smartest in the class - by far. Just had social climbing parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret parent here again. Yes, every grade has a group of super smart, talented, high achieving kids. My kid is one of them, and his friends are similarly academically focused.
Eh...."super smart" compared with what?
I’m sure he/she’s the next Einstein or at least Mark Zuckerberg.
I don't recall Maret having many (any?) NMSF most years whilst SFS, GDS, NCS, STA have loads.
Those schools don't have "loads" and Maret has some. Maret is also smaller than those schools. Plus, last I checked, NMSF is not the only way to assess whether kids are "super smart." Nobody is claiming there are more "super smart" kids at Maret than at Sidwell/STA/NCS, only that there is a cohort of "super smart" kids at Maret. Why are you so desperately trying to refute this? It's true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret parent here again. Yes, every grade has a group of super smart, talented, high achieving kids. My kid is one of them, and his friends are similarly academically focused.
Eh...."super smart" compared with what?
I’m sure he/she’s the next Einstein or at least Mark Zuckerberg.
I don't recall Maret having many (any?) NMSF most years whilst SFS, GDS, NCS, STA have loads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret parent here again. Yes, every grade has a group of super smart, talented, high achieving kids. My kid is one of them, and his friends are similarly academically focused.
Eh...."super smart" compared with what?
I’m sure he/she’s the next Einstein or at least Mark Zuckerberg.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with this in Maret's case becausue they have MSON which allows very top students to do their own thing if they want.Anonymous wrote:Accepting qualified siblings also creates a warm, strong community in which families feel valued as a family unit, not just for their most exceptional child. I think it’s awful for a school to reject qualified siblings just because they might not be the tippy top of the applicant pool. Also, being in a school full of the tippy top students creates a lot of competition and stress in high school which many families would rather avoid.
But MSON is 100% online learning with remote teachers they only see like once a week. Isn’t that exactly what people keep saying we SHOULDNT be doing to kids right now?
Anonymous wrote:The kids who went there from NCRC for K definitely were not the smartest in the class - by far. Just had social climbing parents.