Obviously, if that comes at the expense of ever winning a game or even scoring a goal, then the coach probably needs to figure out some new tricks, because they will lose the team emotionally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and how this is a club issue I cant figure out.
Is this a trend? You not being able to figure stuff out? This problem may have been building for a while and you haven't really noticed it before. Perhaps you should take a test?
I've got to be honest. My child has played for Alexandria for several years (not a top team) and I am getting pretty frustrated at the way that they assemble the teams. The kids are around the same level, that part is correct. But they seem to give no thought to whether they have the right mix of defenders, midfielders, goalkeepers, wings, etc. to field a decent team. The kids are not so little that this doesn't matter/shouldn't be clear. I'm not a person who is always on here hating on the club, but that aspect really feels like a money grab to me. It is demoralizing for the kids, because you can't have a team that is competitive within their own bracket/division if you have a kid who is a striker trying to play defender or vice versa.
So let me get this straight, your child plays on a lower level team and the problem is he/she is a "striker" and being used as a defender or is it vice versa?
either way, your youth player should not be designated a striker or specific to any one position especially on a lower level team. The same is true on a top team. If she is a girl take a look at Crystal Dunn. She led the NWSL in scoring only to make the USWNT and not play her NWSL position. Her versatility made her a complete player
I use her as an example but countless examples exist both male and female.
Your kid needs to work on their skill set at playing all positions not just "striker"
and how this is a club issue I cant figure out.
Anonymous wrote:and how this is a club issue I cant figure out.
Anonymous wrote:I've got to be honest. My child has played for Alexandria for several years (not a top team) and I am getting pretty frustrated at the way that they assemble the teams. The kids are around the same level, that part is correct. But they seem to give no thought to whether they have the right mix of defenders, midfielders, goalkeepers, wings, etc. to field a decent team. The kids are not so little that this doesn't matter/shouldn't be clear. I'm not a person who is always on here hating on the club, but that aspect really feels like a money grab to me. It is demoralizing for the kids, because you can't have a team that is competitive within their own bracket/division if you have a kid who is a striker trying to play defender or vice versa.
Anonymous wrote:I've got to be honest. My child has played for Alexandria for several years (not a top team) and I am getting pretty frustrated at the way that they assemble the teams. The kids are around the same level, that part is correct. But they seem to give no thought to whether they have the right mix of defenders, midfielders, goalkeepers, wings, etc. to field a decent team. The kids are not so little that this doesn't matter/shouldn't be clear. I'm not a person who is always on here hating on the club, but that aspect really feels like a money grab to me. It is demoralizing for the kids, because you can't have a team that is competitive within their own bracket/division if you have a kid who is a striker trying to play defender or vice versa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As in not 3.
They train 3 times
Anonymous wrote:As in not 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Except for red (highest) team for girls, the other 2 levels of girls teams only play 1 tournament this Fall. On the White team under U13, we were charged $1600 for 2x practices/wk with optional additional fee for a 3rd practice day. I think it's priced lower than other clubs but I also think that the coaching and level of play for the younger girl players is also less competitive and hard core.
It's good in that the coaches are supportive and the program is not pressure filled but their style of play does not focus on winning games. It's more about learning basics (positioning), which depending on your overall goal for your kids, can drive you crazy because you will pretty much lose every single game. However, it's a great club to be at if your goals are tempered down. Personally, I wouldn't want to pay more for a sport DD enjoys playing but may or may never excel at her age. But to answer OP question, I do not feel that the price is heavy considering what other area travel clubs are at - but you also get what you pay for.
$1600 for 2 practices per week...Ouch.
Anonymous wrote:Except for red (highest) team for girls, the other 2 levels of girls teams only play 1 tournament this Fall. On the White team under U13, we were charged $1600 for 2x practices/wk with optional additional fee for a 3rd practice day. I think it's priced lower than other clubs but I also think that the coaching and level of play for the younger girl players is also less competitive and hard core.
It's good in that the coaches are supportive and the program is not pressure filled but their style of play does not focus on winning games. It's more about learning basics (positioning), which depending on your overall goal for your kids, can drive you crazy because you will pretty much lose every single game. However, it's a great club to be at if your goals are tempered down. Personally, I wouldn't want to pay more for a sport DD enjoys playing but may or may never excel at her age. But to answer OP question, I do not feel that the price is heavy considering what other area travel clubs are at - but you also get what you pay for.