Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given DC's numbers, it really doesn't feel unsafe to start having half of teachers and half of students (at a time) back in most buildings.
DCB just announced no in person until at least Feb. Very sad for a dual language school serving a high needs population.
I’m torn about it. It’s true that private schools are open with various limitations but five days a week. Indeed we are looking at moving to such a school. If they are doing it does that mean they shouldn’t be and their teachers and staff are being put at risk? What’s the difference?
Anonymous wrote:Given DC's numbers, it really doesn't feel unsafe to start having half of teachers and half of students (at a time) back in most buildings.
DCB just announced no in person until at least Feb. Very sad for a dual language school serving a high needs population.
Anonymous wrote:Given DC's numbers, it really doesn't feel unsafe to start having half of teachers and half of students (at a time) back in most buildings.
DCB just announced no in person until at least Feb. Very sad for a dual language school serving a high needs population.
Anonymous wrote:Eagle Academy is offering all-day child care - very interesting. I wish other charters would follow suit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITS announced today that they will not be bringing anyone back in November, which they had previously said was the plan. Except maaaaybe some with special needs. No new date.
I’m disappointed about this but need to point out they always said they’d be reevaluating the November decision so it was never to be considered a firm plan. But I was really really hoping for it.
I was hoping for at least a bit of preschool, and would happily sacrifice two days of the DL preschool to have two days in person. But it was clear that the teachers had not been told anything and there was never really much of a plan. Meh.
I am disappointed that charters in general are not offering more. What happened to their flexibility and freedom from the scary, scary teachers union? DCPS is at least attempting to go forward with serving high needs kids and providing childcare that some families will probably really appreciate.
+100. I feel like charters are doing zero to prepare for in-person and are just leaving it to parents...
Yep. And everyone gets a pass on testing and charter reviews too. Feel free to underperform! Flexibility!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eagle Academy is offering all-day child care - very interesting. I wish other charters would follow suit.
My school is offering four days a week. Perhaps the schools that are frequented by DCUM posters aren't the ones providing in-person. Perhaps those charters know that most of their parents have the means and they don't need to offer more. Or perhaps, in the absence of government providing their facilities, they know their substandard facilities can't be readied. Or perhaps, it doesn't take a union to respond to teacher needs for the safest environments and conditions possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eagle Academy is offering all-day child care - very interesting. I wish other charters would follow suit.
My school is offering four days a week. Perhaps the schools that are frequented by DCUM posters aren't the ones providing in-person. Perhaps those charters know that most of their parents have the means and they don't need to offer more. Or perhaps, in the absence of government providing their facilities, they know their substandard facilities can't be readied. Or perhaps, it doesn't take a union to respond to teacher needs for the safest environments and conditions possible.
Anonymous wrote:Eagle Academy is offering all-day child care - very interesting. I wish other charters would follow suit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITS announced today that they will not be bringing anyone back in November, which they had previously said was the plan. Except maaaaybe some with special needs. No new date.
I’m disappointed about this but need to point out they always said they’d be reevaluating the November decision so it was never to be considered a firm plan. But I was really really hoping for it.
I was hoping for at least a bit of preschool, and would happily sacrifice two days of the DL preschool to have two days in person. But it was clear that the teachers had not been told anything and there was never really much of a plan. Meh.
I am disappointed that charters in general are not offering more. What happened to their flexibility and freedom from the scary, scary teachers union? DCPS is at least attempting to go forward with serving high needs kids and providing childcare that some families will probably really appreciate.
+100. I feel like charters are doing zero to prepare for in-person and are just leaving it to parents...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITS announced today that they will not be bringing anyone back in November, which they had previously said was the plan. Except maaaaybe some with special needs. No new date.
I’m disappointed about this but need to point out they always said they’d be reevaluating the November decision so it was never to be considered a firm plan. But I was really really hoping for it.
I was hoping for at least a bit of preschool, and would happily sacrifice two days of the DL preschool to have two days in person. But it was clear that the teachers had not been told anything and there was never really much of a plan. Meh.
I am disappointed that charters in general are not offering more. What happened to their flexibility and freedom from the scary, scary teachers union? DCPS is at least attempting to go forward with serving high needs kids and providing childcare that some families will probably really appreciate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITS announced today that they will not be bringing anyone back in November, which they had previously said was the plan. Except maaaaybe some with special needs. No new date.
I’m disappointed about this but need to point out they always said they’d be reevaluating the November decision so it was never to be considered a firm plan. But I was really really hoping for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITS announced today that they will not be bringing anyone back in November, which they had previously said was the plan. Except maaaaybe some with special needs. No new date.
I’m disappointed about this but need to point out they always said they’d be reevaluating the November decision so it was never to be considered a firm plan. But I was really really hoping for it.