Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread ain’t about property crime and simple assaults it’s about SHOOTINGS.
Who’s responsible for all these damn guns out here?
I used to be very strongly against firearms, but the older I get, the more I see the real issue. Legal guns aren't the big problem. The vast majority of crimes aren't committed with legal firearms. Illegal guns are the big problem. Unfortunately most cities don't lock people up for long when they're caught with an illegal gun, and the recent "bail reform" is making things even worse. We need to get people off the street who are using (and demanding) illegal guns. The only way to do that is to lock them up for a long time.
I honestly think that if democrats supported enforcing the gun laws that we already have, we would be able to get the republican support to overturn the second amendment IF guns were still a big problem. But it won't happen until we start enforcing the laws we already have.
Anonymous wrote:This thread ain’t about property crime and simple assaults it’s about SHOOTINGS.
Who’s responsible for all these damn guns out here?
Anonymous wrote:Demonizing and demoralizing police officers seems to be going extremely well . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep voting the way you do. Keep getting the results you’ve gotten.
This is a ridiculous assessment given that Democrats were also in charge when crime rates were at historic lows. Try another variable.
The Dems have now grown more radical, and are basically decriminalizing property crime and simple assaults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep voting the way you do. Keep getting the results you’ve gotten.
This is a ridiculous assessment given that Democrats were also in charge when crime rates were at historic lows. Try another variable.
The Dems have now grown more radical, and are basically decriminalizing property crime and simple assaults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep voting the way you do. Keep getting the results you’ve gotten.
This is a ridiculous assessment given that Democrats were also in charge when crime rates were at historic lows. Try another variable.
The Dems have now grown more radical, and are basically decriminalizing property crime and simple assaults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep voting the way you do. Keep getting the results you’ve gotten.
This is a ridiculous assessment given that Democrats were also in charge when crime rates were at historic lows. Try another variable.
The Dems have now grown more radical, and are basically decriminalizing property crime and simple assaults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep voting the way you do. Keep getting the results you’ve gotten.
This is a ridiculous assessment given that Democrats were also in charge when crime rates were at historic lows. Try another variable.
Anonymous wrote:Keep voting the way you do. Keep getting the results you’ve gotten.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Demonizing and demoralizing police officers seems to be going extremely well . . .
They were crap at solving crime before this. I've been a victim of minor crime in DC, and the police were completely useless. Once, in about 2015, I even had the cell phone of the guy who groped me in broad daylight, and I gave it to the cops, and they still couldn't find the guy. It's not like the cops were doing an outstanding job at solving crime anywhere even before the BLM movement. In 2017 and 2018, police in the US solved less than half of all violent crimes. And if they are unwilling or unable to do their jobs unless they are showered with praise and allowed to beat people up with impunity, maybe they aren't such great public servants.
Fine, but telling all cops (including minority cops) that they are worthless, racist enemies of us all is unlikely to help matters . . . if you were a cop, would you bother with anything beyond the bare minimum right now?
If I was a cop I'd be a consummate professional dedicated to protecting and serving the community - that's what cops sign up to do.
If they sign up just to pick up a paycheck and resign to doing the bare minimum because they aren't getting ticker tape parades every time they step out their door in the morning then they shouldn't be cops.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Demonizing and demoralizing police officers seems to be going extremely well . . .
They were crap at solving crime before this. I've been a victim of minor crime in DC, and the police were completely useless. Once, in about 2015, I even had the cell phone of the guy who groped me in broad daylight, and I gave it to the cops, and they still couldn't find the guy. It's not like the cops were doing an outstanding job at solving crime anywhere even before the BLM movement. In 2017 and 2018, police in the US solved less than half of all violent crimes. And if they are unwilling or unable to do their jobs unless they are showered with praise and allowed to beat people up with impunity, maybe they aren't such great public servants.
Fine, but telling all cops (including minority cops) that they are worthless, racist enemies of us all is unlikely to help matters . . . if you were a cop, would you bother with anything beyond the bare minimum right now?