Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If y’all want to see some legal analysis just wander over to twitter. Folks are piling on. I feel bad for this dude, but he asked for it when he decided to run for office.
Not a twitter user, can you send a link or tell me what to search for?
Buncha threads about this, but this one seems to have the most attention along with replies from Patterson.
https://twitter.com/nathanluecking/status/1313505759070740481?s=21
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If y’all want to see some legal analysis just wander over to twitter. Folks are piling on. I feel bad for this dude, but he asked for it when he decided to run for office.
Not a twitter user, can you send a link or tell me what to search for?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, it looks like the whole family lives there:
Jacque, his twin sister Jacquelyn, Lashanda and Lashandra Patterson, and law Lekicia Johnson all live at the same address on 21st st SE.
Do you hear how stupid you sound? His twin sister? And I am guessing Lashanda and Lashandra are both his wives? Maybe before you start hating on this man, do your research. If not, you will just make yourself look as ignorant as you just above.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... best case scenario he has the rest of the family in MD and he's only committing tax fraud. Maybe the homestead deduction on the MD house is better than what he'd get on the DC house.
Either way, we don't need someone with questionable ethics on the SBOE.
I think we are forgetting what this work is all about. We are talking about where he lives instead of about his work. But that isn't being brought up because you all are messy and petty. Some of you all do not have anything better to do with your time. Petty politics don't educate children. Let's stay focused on who we are doing this work for... the children of the city. You all hate the thought of this man winning more than you all want these children to have fair and impartial education! DO BETTER!
Anonymous wrote:If y’all want to see some legal analysis just wander over to twitter. Folks are piling on. I feel bad for this dude, but he asked for it when he decided to run for office.
Anonymous wrote:They live in the SE house and have had several family members move in and out for periods of time when the family members were on hard times over the years. I know this for a bonafide fact.
He cuts the lawn, seen his beautiful wife going back and forth on errands, they live there.
Regarding the other house, there could be a boatload of reasons why they have it, including inherited from death of a family member etc.
Y’all need to mind your own business!
Anonymous wrote:I bet the OP did not just arbitrarily go down this road of investigation...
... too bad that voters who don’t read will actually believe that there’s an issue here.
The man has been a bonafide DC resident since 1999. Asking anyone who lives on the block they will tell you he and his wife and younger kids live there and BEEN living there since then. He has an older adult daughter now as well so
YALL need to mind ya Business!!!!
Anonymous wrote:I bet the OP did not just arbitrarily go down this road of investigation...
... too bad that voters who don’t read will actually believe that there’s an issue here.
The man has been a bonafide DC resident since 1999. Asking anyone who lives on the block they will tell you he and his wife and younger kids live there and BEEN living there since then. He has an older adult daughter now as well so
YALL need to mind ya Business!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Glad he replied. Some people have A LOT of time of their hands. WTF
He didn't answer the question. No one said it's a problem to own two homes. The problem is claiming that the MD home as a primary residence for tax purposes but claiming the DC home for election residency.
They lack of answer on that and artificial defensiveness makes it pretty clear that there's something fishy going on that he's trying to cover up. Seems like a pattern with him.
Yep. Last time he ran for office, fraudulent signatures on his nomination forms got him kicked off the ballot. Years before that’s he received multiple fines with the election finance board for fine related to tardy or missing finance reports - some of which have never been paid.
Anyone can go in and challenge signatories in a ballot... it happens ALL the time , it doesn’t mean they are fraudulent , they’ve just been challenged.
Why do y’all uppity DCUM folk care so much about this???
Anonymous wrote:They live in the SE house and have had several family members move in and out for periods of time when the family members were on hard times over the years. I know this for a bonafide fact.
He cuts the lawn, seen his beautiful wife going back and forth on errands, they live there.
Regarding the other house, there could be a boatload of reasons why they have it, including inherited from death of a family member etc.
Y’all need to mind your own business!
Anonymous wrote:They live in the SE house and have had several family members move in and out for periods of time when the family members were on hard times over the years. I know this for a bonafide fact.
He cuts the lawn, seen his beautiful wife going back and forth on errands, they live there.
Regarding the other house, there could be a boatload of reasons why they have it, including inherited from death of a family member etc.
Y’all need to mind your own business!
Anonymous wrote:They live in the SE house and have had several family members move in and out for periods of time when the family members were on hard times over the years. I know this for a bonafide fact.
He cuts the lawn, seen his beautiful wife going back and forth on errands, they live there.
Regarding the other house, there could be a boatload of reasons why they have it, including inherited from death of a family member etc.
Y’all need to mind your own business!