Mr. Trump has written off as business expenses costs — including fuel and meals — associated with his aircraft, used to shuttle him among his various homes and properties. Likewise the cost of haircuts, including the more than $70,000 paid to style his hair during “The Apprentice.” Together, nine Trump entities have written off at least $95,464 paid to a favorite hair and makeup artist of Ivanka Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing a lot of people have never taken depreciation on real estate.
Doesn't that only apply to personal property? Trump doesn't own Trump Towers personally.
Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing a lot of people have never taken depreciation on real estate.
Anonymous wrote:This won’t change anyone’s mind - see the crazy responses on this board. But the $750 tax bill, as these Twitter posts already point out, is a brilliant meme and sound bite. History made!
Anonymous wrote:As an accountant I am not surprised by this number at all. He has lost a lot of money on a lot of businesses. Without more detail, the $750 has very little meaning. It's just being dropped to get people outraged
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You lefties know what carried interest means, do the same as 45 yet try to bury him. Sorry, won't work.
Is Trump even eligible for carried interest? I thought that only applied to investment fund managers.
His issue isn’t the carried interest (which is capital rates, which are about 1/3 plus an extra Medicare tax). He issue is that he gets to depreciate everything so much. Totally different situation.
Anonymous wrote:As an accountant I am not surprised by this number at all. He has lost a lot of money on a lot of businesses. Without more detail, the $750 has very little meaning. It's just being dropped to get people outraged
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You lefties know what carried interest means, do the same as 45 yet try to bury him. Sorry, won't work.
Is Trump even eligible for carried interest? I thought that only applied to investment fund managers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol, this is worse than speculation. They don't even show you the document they have, just claim to have the documents. And of course, an anonymous source.
So if they showed you the documents, you'd believe them?