Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just wondering why no one pushed back on the OP's comments about lawyers not making much money? I mean....
OP, JDs or MBAs both have the potential to bring home $250-500 a year but it will require lots of work and focus. You take on debt, school will be demanding and then you will still land in roles like associate at a law firm or analyst at an investment bank. You will need to have discipline to pay back the loans also.
Why has no one suggested entrepreneur? Is there a business you are passionate about building? Lots of successful entrepreneurs did horrible in traditional workplaces, including my current boss. In your situation you can manage more risk than most. Do you have presence? Can you pitch investors?
Because it's true? Unless OP gets into a top-tier law school, performs very well, and gets a job in Big Law.
It didn't seem like OP would want to spend 3 years studying law and then sign up to grind out long hours as a BigLaw associate, at that point in her late 30's.
But it's certainly possible, if OP is interested in it and focused on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get that it's frustrating, but entry level positions are almost all "menial." If they were exciting and interesting, you'd be competing against people with more experience and training for them.
And I do mean to say this gently, but with your current work history as related here, it's going to be hard to convince a hiring manager that any ability you have to excel at more interesting and fulfilling jobs is worth the risk that you'll get bored or frustrated and quit -- because literally every job comes with that risk. You [ui]think[/i] that if you could leapfrog a step or two, you could handle it and stay, but that's kind of magical thinking. Neither you nor anyone else has any reason to think that, and it's a lot of chance to take when there are people who can both do well at the more cool jobs and have proven they can stick it out when things aren't as awesome.
Yeah, I totally get that people would think that, especially hiring managers. I guess that's why I say it's a catch22, and I was hoping to float out the situation and see if anyone has any ideas for a solution that I havent been able to think of. Obviously it's not an ideal situation, to say the least. But I'm hopeful that I can change it or improve it
You're not looking to improve the situation, which would mean managing your ADHD, buckling down and working. You want a silver bullet solution, where you somehow get a top level position in a field you love, where all of the unrealized potential you seem convinced you have suddenly can flourish.
Good luck with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just wondering why no one pushed back on the OP's comments about lawyers not making much money? I mean....
OP, JDs or MBAs both have the potential to bring home $250-500 a year but it will require lots of work and focus. You take on debt, school will be demanding and then you will still land in roles like associate at a law firm or analyst at an investment bank. You will need to have discipline to pay back the loans also.
Why has no one suggested entrepreneur? Is there a business you are passionate about building? Lots of successful entrepreneurs did horrible in traditional workplaces, including my current boss. In your situation you can manage more risk than most. Do you have presence? Can you pitch investors?
Because it's true? Unless OP gets into a top-tier law school, performs very well, and gets a job in Big Law.
It didn't seem like OP would want to spend 3 years studying law and then sign up to grind out long hours as a BigLaw associate, at that point in her late 30's.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get that it's frustrating, but entry level positions are almost all "menial." If they were exciting and interesting, you'd be competing against people with more experience and training for them.
And I do mean to say this gently, but with your current work history as related here, it's going to be hard to convince a hiring manager that any ability you have to excel at more interesting and fulfilling jobs is worth the risk that you'll get bored or frustrated and quit -- because literally every job comes with that risk. You [ui]think[/i] that if you could leapfrog a step or two, you could handle it and stay, but that's kind of magical thinking. Neither you nor anyone else has any reason to think that, and it's a lot of chance to take when there are people who can both do well at the more cool jobs and have proven they can stick it out when things aren't as awesome.
Yeah, I totally get that people would think that, especially hiring managers. I guess that's why I say it's a catch22, and I was hoping to float out the situation and see if anyone has any ideas for a solution that I havent been able to think of. Obviously it's not an ideal situation, to say the least. But I'm hopeful that I can change it or improve it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just wondering why no one pushed back on the OP's comments about lawyers not making much money? I mean....
OP, JDs or MBAs both have the potential to bring home $250-500 a year but it will require lots of work and focus. You take on debt, school will be demanding and then you will still land in roles like associate at a law firm or analyst at an investment bank. You will need to have discipline to pay back the loans also.
Why has no one suggested entrepreneur? Is there a business you are passionate about building? Lots of successful entrepreneurs did horrible in traditional workplaces, including my current boss. In your situation you can manage more risk than most. Do you have presence? Can you pitch investors?
Because it's true? Unless OP gets into a top-tier law school, performs very well, and gets a job in Big Law.
Anonymous wrote:+1 starting a business, law school, +1 MBA
Anonymous wrote:I am just wondering why no one pushed back on the OP's comments about lawyers not making much money? I mean....
OP, JDs or MBAs both have the potential to bring home $250-500 a year but it will require lots of work and focus. You take on debt, school will be demanding and then you will still land in roles like associate at a law firm or analyst at an investment bank. You will need to have discipline to pay back the loans also.
Why has no one suggested entrepreneur? Is there a business you are passionate about building? Lots of successful entrepreneurs did horrible in traditional workplaces, including my current boss. In your situation you can manage more risk than most. Do you have presence? Can you pitch investors?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 starting a business, law school, +1 MBA
Forgot to add that these all require a lot of hard work, focus, and often financial investment--as you probably know. It's a good idea to make sure that your ADHD is treated well first if you choose any of these paths.
FWIW I'm very good at focusing on things that interest me and that I care about. I tested extremely highly and have generally done well in school, although I tended to be a slacker and didn't work that hard. So, I think I could handle the workload, I guess I just wonder if that's the right path or if it's too late, at my age, to start something like this. I've considered law school but have heard lawyers dont make much money, and not sure what I would study in business school, but I have been considering them.