Anonymous wrote:
Saving lives > education.
Always and for ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader did fine in DL. Yes, there was more review than I liked, but the kids worked hard. That combined with all the supplemental courses she takes definitely kept her busy. She loves writing even more than before!
I am more concerned about the number of kids who went AWOL. I'd say at least 1/3 of her class never attended zoom. That speaks to parents having other priorities, not able to help or not respecting education.
DCUM's gonna DCUM. 1/3 of the kids in the PP's kid's class went AWOL last spring during "distance learning," and the PP's response is not "this is terrible, what can MCPS do so this doesn't happen again?" but rather "their parents are bad parents!"
Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader did fine in DL. Yes, there was more review than I liked, but the kids worked hard. That combined with all the supplemental courses she takes definitely kept her busy. She loves writing even more than before!
I am more concerned about the number of kids who went AWOL. I'd say at least 1/3 of her class never attended zoom. That speaks to parents having other priorities, not able to help or not respecting education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idea that in person school is dramatically better is baffling. Have any of you actually set foot in classrooms when school is in session? Ever noticed those kids who aren’t paying any attention, roaming the hallways, fighting, or sleeping? These are the same kids that are being left behind now. While the motivated kids are the same ones who will succeed now. DL is not the difference maker here.
Have you ever watched even a motivated early elementary school kid try to learn by DL? If so, you wouldn’t be so sanguine about DL.
My kids were in K and 3rd grade last spring, so yes, I watched. It’s why I’m choosing DL. The amount of time spent actually learning and not wasting time being distracted by other kids’ discipline issues, plus the ability for advanced groups to meet more often for small group, meant that my kids were able to learn more than ever before.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clearly it is of no concern to anyone. The kids whose parents can afford private school tuition or to hire a MCPS teacher on LOA for their POD can get education this year. The kids whose parents are educated and SAH/can work from home will get somewhat of an education. The rest will get nothing and noone cares.
The hell do you mean by that?! Somewhat?! FU!
NP. I don’t understand why you took such umbrage to that post. I’m educated, so I can somewhat teach my kids, but I’m not a trained teacher or familiar with pedagogy, so I probably won’t be as effective as a real teacher would be. PP’s comment makes sense to me.
Is it the SAH piece? It seems to reason that families with a SAHP, or parents with very flexible jobs, will have an easier time managing their children’s access to MCPS classes and/or providing their own learning opportunities.
You may not like the reality pointed out in the PP, but it seems logical and hardly something to get really upset about.
"Educated" parents are hopefully resourceful, too. My kids learned more at home for many reasons, most of all because I continued supplementing as I have from the start. Some call it after-schooling. I call it filling the gaps. You get what you pay for and I can't swing private, but I am educated as well as resourceful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idea that in person school is dramatically better is baffling. Have any of you actually set foot in classrooms when school is in session? Ever noticed those kids who aren’t paying any attention, roaming the hallways, fighting, or sleeping? These are the same kids that are being left behind now. While the motivated kids are the same ones who will succeed now. DL is not the difference maker here.
Have you ever watched even a motivated early elementary school kid try to learn by DL? If so, you wouldn’t be so sanguine about DL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Saving lives > education.
Always and for ever.
Rich people don’t need to make that choice
This. Wealthy friends and colleagues forming pods with tutors at $500+ a week. No way I can afford that. Sure, I’ll supplement but it will get my kids nothing like what these families can give.
Basically MCPS is creating a private school-public school hybrid as most parents who can are going to bring tutors into the equation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Saving lives > education.
Always and for ever.
Rich people don’t need to make that choice
Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine the poor kids who get abused at home. They'll have no respite this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clearly it is of no concern to anyone. The kids whose parents can afford private school tuition or to hire a MCPS teacher on LOA for their POD can get education this year. The kids whose parents are educated and SAH/can work from home will get somewhat of an education. The rest will get nothing and noone cares.
The hell do you mean by that?! Somewhat?! FU!
NP. I don’t understand why you took such umbrage to that post. I’m educated, so I can somewhat teach my kids, but I’m not a trained teacher or familiar with pedagogy, so I probably won’t be as effective as a real teacher would be. PP’s comment makes sense to me.
Is it the SAH piece? It seems to reason that families with a SAHP, or parents with very flexible jobs, will have an easier time managing their children’s access to MCPS classes and/or providing their own learning opportunities.
You may not like the reality pointed out in the PP, but it seems logical and hardly something to get really upset about.
If you know these words and understand their meanings, I'm pretty sure you can figure out how to keep your child's brain from turning to mush.