Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So If HRT is not done anymore, what is the new effective treatment right now?
SSRIs can be very helpful for women with menopause symptoms.
Anonymous wrote:So If HRT is not done anymore, what is the new effective treatment right now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, it is a thing of the past unless you have severe symptoms. In fact, the whole idea of it being "replacement" therapy sounds like it is a deficit, so it is now referred to as HT- hormone therapy. Women at menopause have what is for them a normal level of hormones at that time of life, and nothing needs to be "replaced" -so that language is even out of favor. -an MD mom.
And this is a shame, because you can feel better even with mild symptoms. Why suffer through menopause?
Why? Menopause is annoying, not sufferable. Chemo and surgery is "suffering."
Anonymous wrote:Not if they have a risk or history of hormone positive cancer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, most women are not on HRT. Long term use has been proven to cause breast cancer, blood clots/MIs/strokes. If you have a hysterectomy with ovaries removed prior to menopause, then HRT may be necessary to lessen the initial shock of instant menopause, but even then it should be closely monitored by a physician. Once natural menopause would have occurred , the HRT should be tapered off.
This is just not true.
Please explain how this is untrue.
NP here. I have the so called “breast cancer” gene — though no breast cancer yet — and my gynecological oncologist, who specializes in working with people who are BRCA+ (with or without cancer), is fine with her patients doing HRT, so long as they have not already had a particular kind of breast cancer that is estrogen positive. (Ideally, she says, a few years of it, not decades, mind you.)
NB: She’s at one of the major research universities you and everyone else knows. She helped write national guidelines for women at high risk of breast cancer due to genetic factors. She’s a pretty sterling source on whether or not HRT raises your breast cancer risk.
But a woman would be safer taking nothing than taking any form of estrogen. Estrogen has been proven to increase breast cancer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, most women are not on HRT. Long term use has been proven to cause breast cancer, blood clots/MIs/strokes. If you have a hysterectomy with ovaries removed prior to menopause, then HRT may be necessary to lessen the initial shock of instant menopause, but even then it should be closely monitored by a physician. Once natural menopause would have occurred , the HRT should be tapered off.
This is just not true.
Please explain how this is untrue.
NP here. I have the so called “breast cancer” gene — though no breast cancer yet — and my gynecological oncologist, who specializes in working with people who are BRCA+ (with or without cancer), is fine with her patients doing HRT, so long as they have not already had a particular kind of breast cancer that is estrogen positive. (Ideally, she says, a few years of it, not decades, mind you.)
NB: She’s at one of the major research universities you and everyone else knows. She helped write national guidelines for women at high risk of breast cancer due to genetic factors. She’s a pretty sterling source on whether or not HRT raises your breast cancer risk.
Anonymous wrote:Only the vaginal estrogen does not have the cancer risk.