Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious what folks think about the prospect of some kids falling behind their peers and possibly needing to be red-shirted at some point? A lot of course depends on how much learning they’re doing at home on their own, but I wonder how this would affect students next year to have peers in their class who need a lot more support and foundational education because they missed out on it this year. I worry it will slow down the pace of learning for the class as teachers help kids play catch-up on what they missed. Anyone else wondering about these kinds of longer-term effects?
It’s PreK. It’s not required. Please relax about the academics. These children are 3&4. It’s gonna be all right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious what folks think about the prospect of some kids falling behind their peers and possibly needing to be red-shirted at some point? A lot of course depends on how much learning they’re doing at home on their own, but I wonder how this would affect students next year to have peers in their class who need a lot more support and foundational education because they missed out on it this year. I worry it will slow down the pace of learning for the class as teachers help kids play catch-up on what they missed. Anyone else wondering about these kinds of longer-term effects?
It’s PreK. It’s not required. Please relax about the academics. These children are 3&4. It’s gonna be all right.
Anonymous wrote:Ha. Distance learning is a joke, especially for young children.
Anonymous wrote:First, the Emergency Child Care Initiative is not available to all essential employees. It is available to health care workers and essential DC government employees. I am an essential DC government employee and I have no reason to think the essential employees covered under this Initiative are disproportionately less able to afford childcare than the average DC resident. We're not talking about grocery store employees and maintenance workers, we're talking about mostly salaried government employees and healthcare workers. That population is either able to afford childcare or already connected to subsidized childcare programs in the District.
Second, that initiative was intended to fill a childcare gap while we were in Phase 1 and daycare centers shut down. It is already being phased out as childcare facilities are re-opening and was not and will not be intended as a substitute for distance learning for school aged kids. It is temporary emergency daycare, not school. If it continues into next school year, school aged students will be expected to participate in distance learning. They cannot "opt out" and not participate in school at all.
Allowing any parent to opt out of distance learning and retain a lottery seat would benefit only those families that are enrolling their child in private school/daycare or have children young enough that they can essentially skip a year of schooling and catch up later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rising PK3-- I'm not feeling good about DL at all- it's basically impossible for that age to keep their attention for longer than 10-20 minutes on a zoom call. If they do anything, it should be 2 days in person 3 days off so we don't have to pretend to log-in to DL 3 days a week.
I also hope they make an accommodation so that families who want to keep their kid home or get some other full-time care (nanny, preschool actually in session etc.) can do that without losing their spot and are guaranteed a spot at that school for PK4 the following year (if we're through this by then, which at this rate...who knows!)
If a family is getting a nanny or a parent at home you should be able to do the 20-45 minutes per day of writing practice, readalouds, art projects, weekly class meetings, etc rather than ask a school to not serve you and possibly lose out on their per pupil funding when they need all the resources they can get.
This. We have no idea how much DL we will do with our PK3 child this fall, but we definitely enrolled and will stay enrolled simply because we don't want to negatively impact the school by withdrawing.
I really don't like the idea that a parent could choose to send their kid to an in-person daycare for this year but retain their spot in a school program because of the pandemic. It would be different if a family opted out of in-person because of concerns about health and safety, but if they are willing to send their kid to in-person care elsewhere (so obviously not that concerned about health/safety), I think they should give up their spot to another family who cannot afford private care. Come on.
I strongly disagree with this. I'm an essential worker. My kid has been going to daycare since April. The daycare is extremely careful (temperature checks, masks, lots of outdoor time). It's been 3 months, and there have been absolutely no issues. So I strongly disagree with your assertion that people who send their kid to places like this and would consider also sending their kid to any in-person days don't care about health and safety. I'd argue that my kid going to this daycare is probably safer than many other arrangements other families will make for distance learning days (hiring a nanny, whose off-hour movements you can't know or control; creating a pod with kids who are in other classes; having older and thus at-risk grandparents step in).
Your opinion comes from a place of privilege and no evidence.