Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. I'm honestly surprised that anyone would choose DL. If conditions deteriorate in Fairfax, then the schools will reclose. If not, then why keep kids at home?
I personally like DL because it's less hassle. Having a schedule 4 days a week works better than 2 days a week. I really don't think that the 3 days with some sort of generic asynchronous work that may or may not be aligned with what the teachers in class are doing, is going to work, which then means that I have to figure out how to give more meaningful work.
It’s a uniform curriculum.
AAP teacher- I am pretty sure whatever the county purchased to help supplement asynchronous learning will not be geared to AAP kids. AAP teachers were left to fend for themselves this spring. I personally did not mind as I had a lot of freedom to do learning experiences that actually challenged the kids. I plan on using the asynchronous days to reinforce skills from the previous day and introduce new curriculum that we will be doing the following day.
Anonymous wrote:DL. My gifted kid is now able to work just as hard at home and do 3x the learning. She is thriving at home with self directed projects and multiple online curricula beyond what’s offered by school. It’s actually been nice to have more time for this. We will benefit from not having the uncertainty of trying to make the hybrid situation work, and dd will probably learn more at home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. I'm honestly surprised that anyone would choose DL. If conditions deteriorate in Fairfax, then the schools will reclose. If not, then why keep kids at home?
I personally like DL because it's less hassle. Having a schedule 4 days a week works better than 2 days a week. I really don't think that the 3 days with some sort of generic asynchronous work that may or may not be aligned with what the teachers in class are doing, is going to work, which then means that I have to figure out how to give more meaningful work.
It’s a uniform curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. I'm honestly surprised that anyone would choose DL. If conditions deteriorate in Fairfax, then the schools will reclose. If not, then why keep kids at home?
I personally like DL because it's less hassle. Having a schedule 4 days a week works better than 2 days a week. I really don't think that the 3 days with some sort of generic asynchronous work that may or may not be aligned with what the teachers in class are doing, is going to work, which then means that I have to figure out how to give more meaningful work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. I'm honestly surprised that anyone would choose DL. If conditions deteriorate in Fairfax, then the schools will reclose. If not, then why keep kids at home?
I personally like DL because it's less hassle. Having a schedule 4 days a week works better than 2 days a week. I really don't think that the 3 days with some sort of generic asynchronous work that may or may not be aligned with what the teachers in class are doing, is going to work, which then means that I have to figure out how to give more meaningful work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. I'm honestly surprised that anyone would choose DL. If conditions deteriorate in Fairfax, then the schools will reclose. If not, then why keep kids at home?
I personally like DL because it's less hassle. Having a schedule 4 days a week works better than 2 days a week. I really don't think that the 3 days with some sort of generic asynchronous work that may or may not be aligned with what the teachers in class are doing, is going to work, which then means that I have to figure out how to give more meaningful work.
Anonymous wrote:NP. I'm honestly surprised that anyone would choose DL. If conditions deteriorate in Fairfax, then the schools will reclose. If not, then why keep kids at home?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has it been addressed whether kids being sent to a center continue to do so? Are center kids being sent back to base? I didn’t pore over the materials so might have missed it but have not seen this addressed (either way)?
It wasn't directly addressed. However center start times are being moved to 10:05, with the earlier start time being something around 9 (I forget exactly, because our base is a center so I didn't pay attention). So they still do have time to bus to centers. Since they may juggle students around - one of my kids' teachers dropped something off today and confirmed that both teachers and students may be asked to move - I don't know that we know for sure where kids will end up, even those of us who are at a center no matter what.
Our center and base are both 9:20 so would both move to 10:05. I would consider driving my child instead of busing, possibly depending how the bus is and certainly if needed. Also wondering that nothing addresses specifically if there will definitely be in-person AAP classes (versus just mixed gen ed).
Where can I see the info about the new times? I missed this aspect.
In the PowerPoint on BoardDocs under the 6/23 meeting. Our center is having a Q&A about fall next week - maybe other schools will follow?
Anonymous wrote:In Person and thrilled we stayed at the base school.