Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well you saw an eyesore, I loved that hotel. Very sad to see it go.
I like it, too. And I doubt the building is going to be demolished just because the hotel is going out of business. I can think of plenty of uses for it.
It won’t be demolished- it’s historical. A building like that is terribly expensive to rehab and maintain so it will likely be sitting without a new tenant/buyer given the current market conditions.
The building you are talking about is aready re-habbed and is condos. The hotel building is not historic and can be taken down almost any time.
I can see parts being changed up like the Fannie Mae building on Wisconsin - maybe a smaller hotel, but some retail and more condos. But the real question is - will the neighborhood throw a temper tantrum over a bit more retail? My guess is yes - NIMBYs going to NIMBY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No it is the Omni Shoreham which is the eye sore. Wardman Park is at least pretty.
Good luck on fighting the WPCA and historic designation for demolition. Not. Gonna. Happen.
But it can be redeveloped!
+1. i wish the outside matched the inside.
- woodley park resident
The inside is so lovely. As are the grounds. And they have a terrific Easter brunch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't agree that it's an eyesore. I hope they don't demolish it.
You may be confusing the hote (newer construction) with the historic building that's been turned into luxury condos.
Which building is OP calling an eyesore?
Anonymous wrote:Is this the hotel down Connecticut Ave. from the zoo? Just off of Rock Creek Pkwy? Is is beautiful. Stunning, in fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't agree that it's an eyesore. I hope they don't demolish it.
You may be confusing the hote (newer construction) with the historic building that's been turned into luxury condos.
Anonymous wrote:I don't agree that it's an eyesore. I hope they don't demolish it.