Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Friday was virtual graduation day for Whitman Seniors. It was a day of celebration, albeit in the middle of social distancing during Coronavirus.
On such a day someone committed that hate crime. It must be running in the genes and the upbringing. Cowards do bad things in the dark. Cowards do bad things in groups overpowering a single person. Cowards do bad things while armed to the teeth and attacking an unarmed person.

Yeah... a day of celebration for Seniors.
To my freshman, sophomore and junior kids, it was just another day...

Not every kid at Whitman was celebrating on Friday, just because the Seniors were graduating.

I hope you are more appalled by the abhorrent act the title of this thread is referring to than to my post about Seniors' virtual graduation celebration day not mentioning that for rising Freshmen, rising Sophomores, and rising Seniors it was just another Friday. Do you mean to say you condone what happened because it was just an ordinary day for your family? My Senior graduated on that day and in the virtual graduation I saw pictures of a number of AA and students from African countries (they may or may not be naturalized citizens of the USA) in the video as their names were read out in the background. Any human being of decent moral character would be appalled by the said graffiti.

What are you talking about?
Read my post again.

My post was inferring that just because it was a day of celebration for seniors, doesn't mean that every person that goes to Whitman was "celebrating" that day.

For many, it was just another day, so the fact that seniors were celebrating has no basis on whether some other kids from the school may have vandalized it.

Where did you come up with the ridiculous notion that I don't condone what happened or don't find it abhorrent, just because I made the comment that graduation day wasn't necessarily a celebratory day for all students of Whitman??

It is difficult to explain to intellectually challenged, especially when they also lack in empathy for others. So I will leave it at that. Bye.

Anonymous wrote:Boys will be boys. I remember when graffiti was just a harmless crime, not like today when it’s basically on the same level as choking a guy to death on the street...

Anonymous wrote:Boys will be boys. I remember when graffiti was just a harmless crime, not like today when it’s basically on the same level as choking a guy to death on the street...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree, not likely to have been done by students.

Of course it was, don't be ridiculous.
School isn't in session now, there isn't a competitive factor like school sports that would drive them to vandalize another school.

I live in the Whitman district and kids are BORED right now. There was no mall or movies open and they have nothing better to do with their time.

We had a bunch of kids driving through our neighborhood and smashing mailboxes with a baseball bat -- bored kids.

I think the ones trying to dissuade us from thinking it was Whitman students ARE the Whitman parents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Friday was virtual graduation day for Whitman Seniors. It was a day of celebration, albeit in the middle of social distancing during Coronavirus.
On such a day someone committed that hate crime. It must be running in the genes and the upbringing. Cowards do bad things in the dark. Cowards do bad things in groups overpowering a single person. Cowards do bad things while armed to the teeth and attacking an unarmed person.

Yeah... a day of celebration for Seniors.
To my freshman, sophomore and junior kids, it was just another day...

Not every kid at Whitman was celebrating on Friday, just because the Seniors were graduating.

I hope you are more appalled by the abhorrent act the title of this thread is referring to than to my post about Seniors' virtual graduation celebration day not mentioning that for rising Freshmen, rising Sophomores, and rising Seniors it was just another Friday. Do you mean to say you condone what happened because it was just an ordinary day for your family? My Senior graduated on that day and in the virtual graduation I saw pictures of a number of AA and students from African countries (they may or may not be naturalized citizens of the USA) in the video as their names were read out in the background. Any human being of decent moral character would be appalled by the said graffiti.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Friday was virtual graduation day for Whitman Seniors. It was a day of celebration, albeit in the middle of social distancing during Coronavirus.
On such a day someone committed that hate crime. It must be running in the genes and the upbringing. Cowards do bad things in the dark. Cowards do bad things in groups overpowering a single person. Cowards do bad things while armed to the teeth and attacking an unarmed person.

Yeah... a day of celebration for Seniors.
To my freshman, sophomore and junior kids, it was just another day...

Not every kid at Whitman was celebrating on Friday, just because the Seniors were graduating.

Anonymous wrote:The racist stuff s so commonplace at the W's it's barely news these days.

Anonymous wrote:Friday was virtual graduation day for Whitman Seniors. It was a day of celebration, albeit in the middle of social distancing during Coronavirus.
On such a day someone committed that hate crime. It must be running in the genes and the upbringing. Cowards do bad things in the dark. Cowards do bad things in groups overpowering a single person. Cowards do bad things while armed to the teeth and attacking an unarmed person.

Anonymous wrote:I agree, not likely to have been done by students.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Somebody kept drawing swastikas near UMD dorms and it turned out to be a black employee. This was one or two years ago. Lots of mentally deranged individuals around the DC area

Why is that any "better.". Swastika is primarily anti-Jewish at this point. Why would it be somehow excusable for a black person to do it?

It’s not better. People like to dismiss anti-Semitic attacks.

It does make a difference who does it, IMO.

The kid who was making phone threats to synagogues in MoCo a few years ago, was going to be an Israeli teen.

There was graffiti on our local synagogue and it turned out that one of the people involved had a mom who worked at the synagogue.

I think they need to prosecute these as harsher simply because it’s vandalism. Focus on the fact that you shouldn’t destroy someone else’s property. No matter what you’re writing.

Yeah, but it’s upsetting to the community nonetheless. Many people dismissed the phone threats as not a big deal because apparently the kid wasn’t actually going to carry it out, but as someone who took my daughter to swim lessons at the Rockville JCC (which had one of the threats) it was really scary nonetheless.

Same thing if a kid spraypaints noose on a wall. Were they going to lynch a black student? Almost certainly not. Is it still very upsetting and contributes to making black students feel unwelcome? Yes.

My kid attends a Jewish school. I remember this well. Yes, it was very upsetting.

It was also much less upsetting when it turned out that the kids was Israeli.

Does it make it less hateful if the kid was Israeli?

Anonymous wrote:I think the far right has gotten into gear and doing whatever they can, wherever they can, to create conflict. That was my first thought when I saw this on the news.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Somebody kept drawing swastikas near UMD dorms and it turned out to be a black employee. This was one or two years ago. Lots of mentally deranged individuals around the DC area

Why is that any "better.". Swastika is primarily anti-Jewish at this point. Why would it be somehow excusable for a black person to do it?

It’s not better. People like to dismiss anti-Semitic attacks.

It does make a difference who does it, IMO.

The kid who was making phone threats to synagogues in MoCo a few years ago, was going to be an Israeli teen.

There was graffiti on our local synagogue and it turned out that one of the people involved had a mom who worked at the synagogue.

I think they need to prosecute these as harsher simply because it’s vandalism. Focus on the fact that you shouldn’t destroy someone else’s property. No matter what you’re writing.

Yeah, but it’s upsetting to the community nonetheless. Many people dismissed the phone threats as not a big deal because apparently the kid wasn’t actually going to carry it out, but as someone who took my daughter to swim lessons at the Rockville JCC (which had one of the threats) it was really scary nonetheless.

Same thing if a kid spraypaints noose on a wall. Were they going to lynch a black student? Almost certainly not. Is it still very upsetting and contributes to making black students feel unwelcome? Yes.

My kid attends a Jewish school. I remember this well. Yes, it was very upsetting.

It was also much less upsetting when it turned out that the kids was Israeli.