Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This place still is only good for a few years and then you go.
Born and raised.
Don't share your sentiments.
I'm born and raised here and agree with the PP. I can only take this city in small doses. We come and go as often as feasible.
It doesn’t have any interesting features really. Setting aside of course the museums and all that which are old after a year or two. No mountains ocean or lovely fields or metro vibe like nyc had pre-covid. It’s really a boring rainy place. It doesn’t even have proper seasons. Hardly any snow mostly cold persistent rain in winter and hot and humid and often rainy in spring and summer. And it’s expensive. And people basically keep to themselves. Just a terribly boring place. Obviously the local above must have family ties that make a difference but if you’re not from here it’s not really good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This place still is only good for a few years and then you go.
Born and raised.
Don't share your sentiments.
I'm born and raised here and agree with the PP. I can only take this city in small doses. We come and go as often as feasible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How exactly is it "picking and choosing who the rules don't apply to?"
It seems pretty straightforward to me. The city owns the street that is now Black Lives Matter Plaza, therefore it is not unlawful for them to place markings upon it. That forced-birth advocate did not own the street they placed markings on, therefore it was illegal for them to do so.
The markings are not cross walk markings. They express an opinion. Other groups have opinions too. Will the city designate streets for them?
That's up to the city, because as I mentioned already, it's their streets to mark or not mark as they see fit. What opinions the city expresses on its streets or which groups they choose to support are irrelevant, all that matters is that the city is allowed to mark their streets and random right wing nut job private citizens aren't.
You mean it's our streets? - citizen/resident
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This place still is only good for a few years and then you go.
Born and raised.
Don't share your sentiments.
Anonymous wrote:This place still is only good for a few years and then you go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How exactly is it "picking and choosing who the rules don't apply to?"
It seems pretty straightforward to me. The city owns the street that is now Black Lives Matter Plaza, therefore it is not unlawful for them to place markings upon it. That forced-birth advocate did not own the street they placed markings on, therefore it was illegal for them to do so.
The markings are not cross walk markings. They express an opinion. Other groups have opinions too. Will the city designate streets for them?
That's up to the city, because as I mentioned already, it's their streets to mark or not mark as they see fit. What opinions the city expresses on its streets or which groups they choose to support are irrelevant, all that matters is that the city is allowed to mark their streets and random right wing nut job private citizens aren't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How exactly is it "picking and choosing who the rules don't apply to?"
It seems pretty straightforward to me. The city owns the street that is now Black Lives Matter Plaza, therefore it is not unlawful for them to place markings upon it. That forced-birth advocate did not own the street they placed markings on, therefore it was illegal for them to do so.
The markings are not cross walk markings. They express an opinion. Other groups have opinions too. Will the city designate streets for them?
Anonymous wrote:
How exactly is it "picking and choosing who the rules don't apply to?"
It seems pretty straightforward to me. The city owns the street that is now Black Lives Matter Plaza, therefore it is not unlawful for them to place markings upon it. That forced-birth advocate did not own the street they placed markings on, therefore it was illegal for them to do so.