Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Nope. And I don't even mind the result, I just think the metrics are goofy, the reasoning opaque, the date incomplete, and his assessment of the costs of closure half-assed. I wouldn't necessarily mind continuing the stay-at-home order in MoCo if I had any confidence in his methodology, but I don't. And what's more I feel like the "stay closed" crowds are glossing over the glaring weaknesses in his approach, which makes me even less confident that were are going to have a competent response.
I totally agree. Moreover, if people would actually LOOK at the dashboard (which I do every day) they would see that we are progressing on ALL metrics except for acute care bed utilization getting down to pre-pandemic levels, which is a ridiculous standard.
I want to re-open, and we should do so carefully, but I don't think looking at ICU beds to make the call is ridiculous. If the cases surge again, we do not want to be in a place where there are few ICU beds available, and not just for patients with covid. The utilization threshold rate is 70%. Is that pre-pandemic rate? I don't know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Nope. And I don't even mind the result, I just think the metrics are goofy, the reasoning opaque, the date incomplete, and his assessment of the costs of closure half-assed. I wouldn't necessarily mind continuing the stay-at-home order in MoCo if I had any confidence in his methodology, but I don't. And what's more I feel like the "stay closed" crowds are glossing over the glaring weaknesses in his approach, which makes me even less confident that were are going to have a competent response.
I totally agree. Moreover, if people would actually LOOK at the dashboard (which I do every day) they would see that we are progressing on ALL metrics except for acute care bed utilization getting down to pre-pandemic levels, which is a ridiculous standard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
He can’t hold out much longer, despite data that supports a more cautious opening, because it will be too much pressure.
Not his fault.
The caution should be directed at the nursing homes, and everyone knows that. He looks ridiculous.
I strongly disagree. This has been explained ad nauseam. Nursing homes are part of the community, you cannot pretend they’re in their own bubble.
Are you suggesting that nursing home employees leave the families —including their school age children— and move into the nursing home faculties until we have a vaccine? Because that is the only way they can isolate.
Shutting down camps and pools and schools is just wrong for our society. Nursing homes can isolate.
Anonymous wrote:.I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Nope. And I don't even mind the result, I just think the metrics are goofy, the reasoning opaque, the date incomplete, and his assessment of the costs of closure half-assed. I wouldn't necessarily mind continuing the stay-at-home order in MoCo if I had any confidence in his methodology, but I don't. And what's more I feel like the "stay closed" crowds are glossing over the glaring weaknesses in his approach, which makes me even less confident that were are going to have a competent response
I totally agree. Moreover, if people would actually LOOK at the dashboard (which I do every day) they would see that we are progressing on ALL metrics except for acute care bed utilization getting down to pre-pandemic levels, which is a ridiculous standard.
Also. Futility is a thing. If all is open to our north, to our south, to our east and our west--c'mon, maintaining a stay-at-home order will do nothing but grind our last local businesses into the ground* with no conceivable public heath benefit.
*And I'm an anxious teleworking 1%-er and even I recognize this.
.I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Nope. And I don't even mind the result, I just think the metrics are goofy, the reasoning opaque, the date incomplete, and his assessment of the costs of closure half-assed. I wouldn't necessarily mind continuing the stay-at-home order in MoCo if I had any confidence in his methodology, but I don't. And what's more I feel like the "stay closed" crowds are glossing over the glaring weaknesses in his approach, which makes me even less confident that were are going to have a competent response
I totally agree. Moreover, if people would actually LOOK at the dashboard (which I do every day) they would see that we are progressing on ALL metrics except for acute care bed utilization getting down to pre-pandemic levels, which is a ridiculous standard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Nope. And I don't even mind the result, I just think the metrics are goofy, the reasoning opaque, the date incomplete, and his assessment of the costs of closure half-assed. I wouldn't necessarily mind continuing the stay-at-home order in MoCo if I had any confidence in his methodology, but I don't. And what's more I feel like the "stay closed" crowds are glossing over the glaring weaknesses in his approach, which makes me even less confident that were are going to have a competent response.
I totally agree. Moreover, if people would actually LOOK at the dashboard (which I do every day) they would see that we are progressing on ALL metrics except for acute care bed utilization getting down to pre-pandemic levels, which is a ridiculous standard.
Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Nope. And I don't even mind the result, I just think the metrics are goofy, the reasoning opaque, the date incomplete, and his assessment of the costs of closure half-assed. I wouldn't necessarily mind continuing the stay-at-home order in MoCo if I had any confidence in his methodology, but I don't. And what's more I feel like the "stay closed" crowds are glossing over the glaring weaknesses in his approach, which makes me even less confident that were are going to have a competent response.
Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
He can’t hold out much longer, despite data that supports a more cautious opening, because it will be too much pressure.
Not his fault.
The caution should be directed at the nursing homes, and everyone knows that. He looks ridiculous.
I strongly disagree. This has been explained ad nauseam. Nursing homes are part of the community, you cannot pretend they’re in their own bubble.
I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
He can’t hold out much longer, despite data that supports a more cautious opening, because it will be too much pressure.
Not his fault.
The caution should be directed at the nursing homes, and everyone knows that. He looks ridiculous.
I strongly disagree. This has been explained ad nauseam. Nursing homes are part of the community, you cannot pretend they’re in their own bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
He can’t hold out much longer, despite data that supports a more cautious opening, because it will be too much pressure.
Not his fault.
The caution should be directed at the nursing homes, and everyone knows that. He looks ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Elrich’s caution and prioritization of public health and hope he holds strong.
He can’t hold out much longer, despite data that supports a more cautious opening, because it will be too much pressure.
Not his fault.