Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I also thought that was a terrible example. I assume the husband has some kind of mental health issue (perhaps depression) that prevents him from holding a job or caring for a single three year old.
But I also assume they had a boatload of money saved, since she could afford to quit while he was unemployed. And I believe from the article that she was burned out and wanted to see her kid, which I understand. If I had a boatload of money, I'd quit too.
I just feel bad for her employees. And since she could afford a nanny, it's not a good example of how most people struggle right now.
If a mother refused to care for her 3 y.o. while her high-earning spouse worked, no one would make these excuses for her. They would flat out say she's a terrible parent...and absent additional information I have trouble thinking differently about this dad. He trained his 3y.o. to pull her away in the middle of work by calling her by her first name? Whatever his reasons, he's a jerk.
But this whole article is like that. The example of the woman who quit her job because her fiance didn't want the kids at day care even before they closed...okay, why didn't he care for the kids then?
To be fair - I'm not entirely sure the 4 and 2 year-old are his kids. The six-week-old, probably.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I also thought that was a terrible example. I assume the husband has some kind of mental health issue (perhaps depression) that prevents him from holding a job or caring for a single three year old.
But I also assume they had a boatload of money saved, since she could afford to quit while he was unemployed. And I believe from the article that she was burned out and wanted to see her kid, which I understand. If I had a boatload of money, I'd quit too.
I just feel bad for her employees. And since she could afford a nanny, it's not a good example of how most people struggle right now.
If a mother refused to care for her 3 y.o. while her high-earning spouse worked, no one would make these excuses for her. They would flat out say she's a terrible parent...and absent additional information I have trouble thinking differently about this dad. He trained his 3y.o. to pull her away in the middle of work by calling her by her first name? Whatever his reasons, he's a jerk.
But this whole article is like that. The example of the woman who quit her job because her fiance didn't want the kids at day care even before they closed...okay, why didn't he care for the kids then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just... don’t understand how these women (her, people on television, acquaintances) marry men like this. My DH works full time and I work part time. It makes sense that I do the childcare when he is at work and I am not (obviously). But when he gets home, it is 50/50. I don’t “ask” him to take care of the kids, I don’t ask him to babysit, he is an adult who has the exact same knowledge and capabilities as me when it comes to child rearing. I don’t get why women put up with this.
Some women will do anything to be married. Some men will do anything to be married.
Anonymous wrote:Trying to understand this woman’s choice.
She quit her job and dissolved her successful company with 13 employees all because her husband couldn’t handle childcare for a 3-year-old.
Did I mention the husband is unemployed?
https://www.thelily.com/i-had-to-choose-being-a-mother-with-no-child-care-or-summer-camps-women-are-being-edged-out-of-the-workforce
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It was a bad example for the subject of the article because the woman was not in any way forced to quit her job because of childcare. The husband just didn't want to do it, and she probably could have hired a nanny if she really wanted to keep her job. She just wanted to leave her job and used the daycare situation as an excuse, which is fine, but not a good example for the article
If she’s angling for a divorce, she might be better off filling when both are unemployed... She probably wants a break to spend more time with her son. Plus this article would help her get primary custody of her son and avoid paying crazy child support to her husband. As a tech CEO, she could easily start a new company after the divorce and make up for lost time.
All things considered, this sets her up pretty nicely if she decides to divorce him.
Anonymous wrote:
It was a bad example for the subject of the article because the woman was not in any way forced to quit her job because of childcare. The husband just didn't want to do it, and she probably could have hired a nanny if she really wanted to keep her job. She just wanted to leave her job and used the daycare situation as an excuse, which is fine, but not a good example for the article
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like her partner was ready to sell the company. The article noted that her business partner was becoming more unavailable. Maybe she didn’t want to run the company by herself or couldn’t afford to buy out her partner. There are a ton of pieces missing from this story.
Anonymous wrote:
It was a bad example for the subject of the article because the woman was not in any way forced to quit her job because of childcare. The husband just didn't want to do it, and she probably could have hired a nanny if she really wanted to keep her job. She just wanted to leave her job and used the daycare situation as an excuse, which is fine, but not a good example for the article