Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The scattered and disorganized piece makes me wonder if St. Anselm's Abbey would be a good choice. The boys who have gone there from our coed K-8 have tended to be bright and friendly, but with some organizational challenges that are partially just...being a teen boy.
I know you are getting him evaluated for ADHD so don't want to put this all down to sex/gender but from what I've heard, their single sex model focused on how boys in particular learn is a good fit for the kind of kid you describe.
I thought St Anselms was for incredibly smart boys?
St. Anselm’s is for incredibly diligent, dedicated, and focused kids. However, it is imported to understand that isn’t the same as “smart kids.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The scattered and disorganized piece makes me wonder if St. Anselm's Abbey would be a good choice. The boys who have gone there from our coed K-8 have tended to be bright and friendly, but with some organizational challenges that are partially just...being a teen boy.
I know you are getting him evaluated for ADHD so don't want to put this all down to sex/gender but from what I've heard, their single sex model focused on how boys in particular learn is a good fit for the kind of kid you describe.
I thought St Anselms was for incredibly smart boys?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The scattered and disorganized piece makes me wonder if St. Anselm's Abbey would be a good choice. The boys who have gone there from our coed K-8 have tended to be bright and friendly, but with some organizational challenges that are partially just...being a teen boy.
I know you are getting him evaluated for ADHD so don't want to put this all down to sex/gender but from what I've heard, their single sex model focused on how boys in particular learn is a good fit for the kind of kid you describe.
I thought St Anselms was for incredibly smart boys?
There are plenty of incredibly smart boys with executive function skills that are slow to mature.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The scattered and disorganized piece makes me wonder if St. Anselm's Abbey would be a good choice. The boys who have gone there from our coed K-8 have tended to be bright and friendly, but with some organizational challenges that are partially just...being a teen boy.
I know you are getting him evaluated for ADHD so don't want to put this all down to sex/gender but from what I've heard, their single sex model focused on how boys in particular learn is a good fit for the kind of kid you describe.
I thought St Anselms was for incredibly smart boys?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Landon way better than st Andrews
OP here,
These kind of posts don't help me. I'm not looking for the "best" school. I'm looking for the school that's the right fit for my child. If you can tell me a little bit about Landon and why you think it's the right fit, I'd appreciate it. If you know something about St. A's that makes you feel it wouldn't be a fit, that would be great too.
But I'm not sure what to do with the information above.
We just went through this and will tell you - 1. st Anselm’s is very academically challenging and there didn’t seem to be anything in place for ADHD help. Plus it’s single sex. SJC seems to have a robust program to help ADHD kids and they focus on executive functioning which sounds like something your so. And my child need! Good luck!!
Anonymous wrote:The scattered and disorganized piece makes me wonder if St. Anselm's Abbey would be a good choice. The boys who have gone there from our coed K-8 have tended to be bright and friendly, but with some organizational challenges that are partially just...being a teen boy.
I know you are getting him evaluated for ADHD so don't want to put this all down to sex/gender but from what I've heard, their single sex model focused on how boys in particular learn is a good fit for the kind of kid you describe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Landon way better than st Andrews
OP here,
These kind of posts don't help me. I'm not looking for the "best" school. I'm looking for the school that's the right fit for my child. If you can tell me a little bit about Landon and why you think it's the right fit, I'd appreciate it. If you know something about St. A's that makes you feel it wouldn't be a fit, that would be great too.
But I'm not sure what to do with the information above.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you should also consider public. Public allows more differentiation in classes -he could take appropriate level academics and pick and choose his sports and do music during the day. What HS are you zoned for?
Yeah, public is definitely on our list. We're in the DCC, and there's a lot to like about our local options. I think given his love of music, either Einstein or Northwood would be the right fit for him. We're zoned for one of those two, and could apply to the other.
My hesitation with public, is my concern that he's one of those kids who does well enough that he wouldn't qualify for services, but would find the executive functioning demands overwhelming. So, I want to make sure that we're looking at all options.
Anonymous wrote:I think you should also consider public. Public allows more differentiation in classes -he could take appropriate level academics and pick and choose his sports and do music during the day. What HS are you zoned for?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about Potomac? Yes, its very rigorous academically but your son sonds like a great fit in every other way.
OP here,
I don't know a lot about Potomac. My impression of the school is that it's academically similar to some schools I do know kids at, such as Sidwell and GDS. If that's accurate, then I don't think it would be a fit for my kid. I think that his self esteem is going to be dependent on being able to keep up academically, and also to do the things he does well, like sports and music. I can't imagine that working with that level of workload.
How different is the workload and rigor of the schools on my list?
I agree with you that Potomac is probably not a great fit.
OP - one thing to keep in mind with athletics will not just be whether they are "offered" - but how much they are "required". Schools with heavy athletics requirements can add a huge chunk of time to your child's day and responsibility. If your child likes to have downtime, be sure that the school allows for sports requirements to be met with a smaller commitment option. Suppose he plays on a team for two seasons (or even just 1) - in the off season, it helps if he can take a lighter load PE class that meets a few times a week or for 45-60 min a day if it's still 5x a week - these are more manageable than a longer practice 5x a week plus games. I know some kids who chose schools (and liked sports) but underestimated how much time it takes to be on a team for 3 seasons. My son goes to a school where there is an option to take a PE class a few times a week and he really appreciates the time he gets back in his off season trimester (He goes to a higher pressure school). Note that none of that will be an issue for public, where he will not be required to play on a sports team.
OP here,
I have a kid who "needs" sports. He needs them to manage his anxiety, to help him regulate himself, to boost his self esteem. I think that if the workload at a school was such that he couldn't manage it and a sport each season, it would mean that it was the wrong school.
Anonymous wrote:OP - reinforcing what’s already been said. Your list of SSFS, SAES, and Burke is excellent, especially if you already know them to be equally convenient to you. All are respected schools but each has a different vibe, demographic, and fit. Explore them all - for your son and family....good luck!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about Potomac? Yes, its very rigorous academically but your son sonds like a great fit in every other way.
OP here,
I don't know a lot about Potomac. My impression of the school is that it's academically similar to some schools I do know kids at, such as Sidwell and GDS. If that's accurate, then I don't think it would be a fit for my kid. I think that his self esteem is going to be dependent on being able to keep up academically, and also to do the things he does well, like sports and music. I can't imagine that working with that level of workload.
How different is the workload and rigor of the schools on my list?
I agree with you that Potomac is probably not a great fit.
OP - one thing to keep in mind with athletics will not just be whether they are "offered" - but how much they are "required". Schools with heavy athletics requirements can add a huge chunk of time to your child's day and responsibility. If your child likes to have downtime, be sure that the school allows for sports requirements to be met with a smaller commitment option. Suppose he plays on a team for two seasons (or even just 1) - in the off season, it helps if he can take a lighter load PE class that meets a few times a week or for 45-60 min a day if it's still 5x a week - these are more manageable than a longer practice 5x a week plus games. I know some kids who chose schools (and liked sports) but underestimated how much time it takes to be on a team for 3 seasons. My son goes to a school where there is an option to take a PE class a few times a week and he really appreciates the time he gets back in his off season trimester (He goes to a higher pressure school). Note that none of that will be an issue for public, where he will not be required to play on a sports team.
OP here,
I have a kid who "needs" sports. He needs them to manage his anxiety, to help him regulate himself, to boost his self esteem. I think that if the workload at a school was such that he couldn't manage it and a sport each season, it would mean that it was the wrong school.
I'm the PP. I guess that's the reason why I expounded. I would put Potomac into that category....workload plus sports will be hard. I know others have mentioned Landon sports can be a lot....but I am less familiar with the workload there - and it probably depends on which courseload he chooses to take. My guess is that there is an academic track there that would allow him to balance work with sports. But you did say all boys wasn't appealing, so maybe this isn't helpful.
I agree with others on St Andrews, Good Council. I don't know anyone personally at St Johns - but also seems like it has the sports and the ability to choose a courseload that is manageable. I also think Sandy Spring is a nice school, but perhaps your son will not get what he wants in the sports category.
I guess one question to consider is whether he's ok with merely the presence of sports teams versus the athletic strength of his teammates. (For my kids, this second part doesn't matter, but I know from being on rec teams outside of school that there are plenty of kids that get frustrated when their teammates aren't as passionate...and this often translates to skilled - and they move on to more competitive programs)