Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I was young, I romanticized big families.
But, it’s pretty narcissistic to want to overpopulate the world with your offspring isn’t it? And selfish. Even if you have all the money I’m the world, what makes you think you and your family are actually “value add?” And if you aren’t thinking about it that way, you should be.
I think its narcissistic to never have children. You clearly don't know what having children is about.
Anonymous wrote:Once you get past 4, it is like falling off a bike to add another kid to the group. Some people look at the capacity to love as finite and you're seeing some of those posts here. It sounds like you and your husband know that love is NOT finite and that you have the capacity for an infinite supply of love. I say go for it, OP! The world could use a lot more love these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just not enough time for each child IMO. At some point they become a herd rather than individuals.
It depends how they're spaced.
Even if kids are spaced out, there is only so much time during the day. You cannot spend quality time with each one individually.
Can you pay for college and graduate school, at least a state school for all 4-5 kids?
Can each kid be in 1-2 activities where you drive them?
What will you do about child care? Will they spend more time with the nanny than you?
Lots of big families work, but lots gets neglected because too many kids or the older ones parent the younger ones.
I am someone who has a mixed family that results in six (I posted on the first page) and the answer to all your questions except the last one is yes. Keep in mind that *I* am not their only parent. Four of the kids have two parents and two of the kids have three parents. So while one kid may have to wait a couple of hours to talk through a problem with us, that can easily happen in a household with two children also.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just not enough time for each child IMO. At some point they become a herd rather than individuals.
It depends how they're spaced.
Even if kids are spaced out, there is only so much time during the day. You cannot spend quality time with each one individually.
Can you pay for college and graduate school, at least a state school for all 4-5 kids?
Can each kid be in 1-2 activities where you drive them?
What will you do about child care? Will they spend more time with the nanny than you?
Lots of big families work, but lots gets neglected because too many kids or the older ones parent the younger ones.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I was young, I romanticized big families.
But, it’s pretty narcissistic to want to overpopulate the world with your offspring isn’t it? And selfish. Even if you have all the money I’m the world, what makes you think you and your family are actually “value add?” And if you aren’t thinking about it that way, you should be.
By your logic, you shouldn’t be allowed any children at all. Do you have kids? What makes you the judge of how many is ok? Do your children “value add”?
Unless you don’t have children, you really can’t call people out.
Np. Is math challenging for you. If you have more than two kids, you are helping to overpopulate the world. It is by definition selfish. The op is thinking of what she wants over the disadvantages to the rest of us. She can still choose to do it, but it is selfish.
If they really cared about the environment, they would have no kids or adopt. It has nothing to do with math. They probably didn’t want more than two kids and it’s easy to sit back and call people out who want more.
That's pretty funny. I expect you have zero kids. You certainly have zero empathy.![]()
Not at all. I just *really* dislike hypocrites and mean people. Don’t open the thread if you have nothing nice to say.
Excuse me what? I do have nice things to say about having kids. I think its probably the best thing you can do in life. I don't agree with your statement about adopting or not having kids. That doesn't make me "not nice" you imbecile.
Oh you do sound like a nice person!
Anonymous wrote:I have seven and sound similar. My husband is a surgeon and I don’t work. We go to church occasionally, but it has nothing to do with the number of kids we have. We just really like kids. My kids go to public school and all are really involved in sports and extracurriculars.
I will warn that they do get so much more expensive as high school hits. We are feeling a bit of a financial crunch as the three older ones hit high school that we didn’t feel when they were younger.
No regrets here. We are done at 7 but I would have loved to have more if I felt we could handle it (age and finances are mostly why we stopped).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just not enough time for each child IMO. At some point they become a herd rather than individuals.
It depends how they're spaced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I was young, I romanticized big families.
But, it’s pretty narcissistic to want to overpopulate the world with your offspring isn’t it? And selfish. Even if you have all the money I’m the world, what makes you think you and your family are actually “value add?” And if you aren’t thinking about it that way, you should be.
By your logic, you shouldn’t be allowed any children at all. Do you have kids? What makes you the judge of how many is ok? Do your children “value add”?
Unless you don’t have children, you really can’t call people out.
Np. Is math challenging for you. If you have more than two kids, you are helping to overpopulate the world. It is by definition selfish. The op is thinking of what she wants over the disadvantages to the rest of us. She can still choose to do it, but it is selfish.
If they really cared about the environment, they would have no kids or adopt. It has nothing to do with math. They probably didn’t want more than two kids and it’s easy to sit back and call people out who want more.
That's pretty funny. I expect you have zero kids. You certainly have zero empathy.![]()
Not at all. I just *really* dislike hypocrites and mean people. Don’t open the thread if you have nothing nice to say.
Excuse me what? I do have nice things to say about having kids. I think its probably the best thing you can do in life. I don't agree with your statement about adopting or not having kids. That doesn't make me "not nice" you imbecile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I was young, I romanticized big families.
But, it’s pretty narcissistic to want to overpopulate the world with your offspring isn’t it? And selfish. Even if you have all the money I’m the world, what makes you think you and your family are actually “value add?” And if you aren’t thinking about it that way, you should be.
By your logic, you shouldn’t be allowed any children at all. Do you have kids? What makes you the judge of how many is ok? Do your children “value add”?
Unless you don’t have children, you really can’t call people out.
Np. Is math challenging for you. If you have more than two kids, you are helping to overpopulate the world. It is by definition selfish. The op is thinking of what she wants over the disadvantages to the rest of us. She can still choose to do it, but it is selfish.
If they really cared about the environment, they would have no kids or adopt. It has nothing to do with math. They probably didn’t want more than two kids and it’s easy to sit back and call people out who want more.
That's pretty funny. I expect you have zero kids. You certainly have zero empathy.![]()
Not at all. I just *really* dislike hypocrites and mean people. Don’t open the thread if you have nothing nice to say.