Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. On March 7th, we were all still going about our lives. No way they could have known what this would become.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I don't the the president could order anything for a cruise that began and was supposed to end, in another country.
He could have said “don’t go on a cruise”, but he said “this will all be over soon”.
Lol. You are really reaching.
I went on a March 7th cruise to the western Caribbean and it was absolutely wonderful, everyone on the ship was having a fun time, I am so glad that we were able to go before the cruise ships were stopped. I can honestly say that I am glad I went on that cruise as opposed to going to NYC...which we had talked about doing.
How does it make you feel to read that everyone on this thread would have no sympathy if you were dying now because you did that.
This pandemic is bringing the lord of the flies types in our culture
They knowingly and deliberately put the rest of us at risk just to have some FUN. Absolutely no other reason except to have a bit of fun. So yeah, I have no sympathy.
But if I had gone to a real high risk area (NYC) you would have sympathy for me? Make some sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. On March 7th, we were all still going about our lives. No way they could have known what this would become.
No. My kids last went to school on March 6. It was so apparent things were going to get bad that we did not send them the next week. The only way you could think getting on a cruise was ok is if you were not paying attention or have no clue how to assess risk.
I saw the hysteria mounting and really had expected it to die down based on the actual numbers. That did not happen, though.
Regardless, we were never in danger of not getting back into the country. Our biggest danger was perhaps having one of the ports closed but that did not seem likely. Worst case scenario was that we would not be able to port and spend more days at sea than planned.
We sailed from a low risk area to another low risk area and back again.
You got lucky. It was stupid what you did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I don't the the president could order anything for a cruise that began and was supposed to end, in another country.
He could have said “don’t go on a cruise”, but he said “this will all be over soon”.
Lol. You are really reaching.
I went on a March 7th cruise to the western Caribbean and it was absolutely wonderful, everyone on the ship was having a fun time, I am so glad that we were able to go before the cruise ships were stopped. I can honestly say that I am glad I went on that cruise as opposed to going to NYC...which we had talked about doing.
How does it make you feel to read that everyone on this thread would have no sympathy if you were dying now because you did that.
This pandemic is bringing the lord of the flies types in our culture
They knowingly and deliberately put the rest of us at risk just to have some FUN. Absolutely no other reason except to have a bit of fun. So yeah, I have no sympathy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. On March 7th, we were all still going about our lives. No way they could have known what this would become.
No. My kids last went to school on March 6. It was so apparent things were going to get bad that we did not send them the next week. The only way you could think getting on a cruise was ok is if you were not paying attention or have no clue how to assess risk.
I saw the hysteria mounting and really had expected it to die down based on the actual numbers. That did not happen, though.
Regardless, we were never in danger of not getting back into the country. Our biggest danger was perhaps having one of the ports closed but that did not seem likely. Worst case scenario was that we would not be able to port and spend more days at sea than planned.
We sailed from a low risk area to another low risk area and back again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. On March 7th, we were all still going about our lives. No way they could have known what this would become.
No. My kids last went to school on March 6. It was so apparent things were going to get bad that we did not send them the next week. The only way you could think getting on a cruise was ok is if you were not paying attention or have no clue how to assess risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than 100 passengers have symptoms, along with more than 80 crew members.
This information was just broadcast on MSNBC. They interviewed two passengers on the ship who said they went on the cruise because Florida's governor said "people should go on with their lives" and President Trump said, "This will be over soon" (paraphrasing the interview content).
Read the article! The cruise began in Argentina and was supposed to end in Chile-it had nothing to do with Florida, the governor or the President!
+1 Paraphrasing, paraphrasing?! Try outright lying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. On March 7th, we were all still going about our lives. No way they could have known what this would become.
No. My kids last went to school on March 6. It was so apparent things were going to get bad that we did not send them the next week. The only way you could think getting on a cruise was ok is if you were not paying attention or have no clue how to assess risk.
That's interesting you made that choice but I know of literally no one who did this. Our schools were open the full next week, schools closing not until the 16th.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. On March 7th, we were all still going about our lives. No way they could have known what this would become.
No. My kids last went to school on March 6. It was so apparent things were going to get bad that we did not send them the next week. The only way you could think getting on a cruise was ok is if you were not paying attention or have no clue how to assess risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than 100 passengers have symptoms, along with more than 80 crew members.
This information was just broadcast on MSNBC. They interviewed two passengers on the ship who said they went on the cruise because Florida's governor said "people should go on with their lives" and President Trump said, "This will be over soon" (paraphrasing the interview content).
Read the article! The cruise began in Argentina and was supposed to end in Chile-it had nothing to do with Florida, the governor or the President!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh please. Trump told people NOT to cruise right now. Shut up OP.
***citation needed***
It is true.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/us/politics/cruise-ship-warning.html
Bullshit. Trump did not say that.
Fauci and CDC are not Trump.
Ain't that the understatement of the year.
I wouldn't say that too loudly. I don't think the CDC has been doing an acceptable job during any of this either. This is literally what they are supposed to DO. There are thousands of people involved, all taking a good salary to protect us from these things and manage them properly. I have no respect for the CDC after all this.
If only they were properly funded and staffed.
I really don't see this as a reason. If every employee at the CDC was working effectively and doing everything they could to get PPE and push forward treatment development/discovery then I'd love to hear about that, but I really don't think it was the case.
People like Elon Musk could go and buy ventilators himself and bring them over and donate them to hospitals here. Do you think people at the CDC couldn't have been making those calls? I don't believe that for a second.
If they're so incompetent that they couldn't get PPE and/or ventilators for us THAT ARE OUT THERE ARE AVAILABLE then they aren't doing their jobs. Period.
Trump, Bannon, Miller tried to gut government agencies - staffing and funding. Guess what? It worked.
And guess what? Crappy leadership (incl HHS) ends in crappy results. How much were they “allowed” to purchase? Sounds like Trump is shopping around for deals himself (against the states).
What exactly would they have done with more money? You can't just say "it would have been better if you'd given us more money!" without backing that up. My impression is that there were "technical glitches" (AKA screwups) within the CDC that prevented timely test roll out, and I'm still waiting to hear how every member of the CDC was doing everything they could to make things happen and that more money would have genuinely been needed or had positive impact.
And as for your 'accusation' that Trump was running around trying to procure things, I actually see that as a positive. A bit late, but something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I don't the the president could order anything for a cruise that began and was supposed to end, in another country.
He could have said “don’t go on a cruise”, but he said “this will all be over soon”.
Lol. You are really reaching.
I went on a March 7th cruise to the western Caribbean and it was absolutely wonderful, everyone on the ship was having a fun time, I am so glad that we were able to go before the cruise ships were stopped. I can honestly say that I am glad I went on that cruise as opposed to going to NYC...which we had talked about doing.
How does it make you feel to read that everyone on this thread would have no sympathy if you were dying now because you did that.
This pandemic is bringing the lord of the flies types in our culture
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh please. Trump told people NOT to cruise right now. Shut up OP.
***citation needed***
It is true.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/us/politics/cruise-ship-warning.html
Bullshit. Trump did not say that.
Fauci and CDC are not Trump.
Ain't that the understatement of the year.
I wouldn't say that too loudly. I don't think the CDC has been doing an acceptable job during any of this either. This is literally what they are supposed to DO. There are thousands of people involved, all taking a good salary to protect us from these things and manage them properly. I have no respect for the CDC after all this.
If only they were properly funded and staffed.
I really don't see this as a reason. If every employee at the CDC was working effectively and doing everything they could to get PPE and push forward treatment development/discovery then I'd love to hear about that, but I really don't think it was the case.
People like Elon Musk could go and buy ventilators himself and bring them over and donate them to hospitals here. Do you think people at the CDC couldn't have been making those calls? I don't believe that for a second.
If they're so incompetent that they couldn't get PPE and/or ventilators for us THAT ARE OUT THERE ARE AVAILABLE then they aren't doing their jobs. Period.
Trump, Bannon, Miller tried to gut government agencies - staffing and funding. Guess what? It worked.
And guess what? Crappy leadership (incl HHS) ends in crappy results. How much were they “allowed” to purchase? Sounds like Trump is shopping around for deals himself (against the states).
Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. On March 7th, we were all still going about our lives. No way they could have known what this would become.