Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. I've worked 20 years in the type of work you're considering. When you call it a dream job, realize that is a correct term- your dream, not your reality.
It can be enormously interesting and you certainly can be empowered to make a significant difference. However it is not worth the pay cut you're considering. You also believe your relative age is an advantage, and you are wrong. While it won't hurt you, it also won't weigh in your favor. You'll be facing genuine competition from 23 year olds. For example, I made 15 by age 30, and not because there was a lack of older competition.
I think more broadly, you have a good job, good benefits, good boss- you are not promised that. Federal compensation degrades every year. Ask them how much you'll be paying into the pension plan. Unless you're on an unusual pay plan, you'll get sticker shock. Example- as someone who has been in and grandfather into the old system, I pay about $50 every 2 weeks. A new person making the same amount pays $600 every 2 weeks. That's just for the pension- you'll also need to fund your TSP. Oh, and check out the premiums on health insurance.
As a private sector person, you're probably also used to things like having coffee at the office, at a minimum. Literally nothing is free in the government. You will pay all your own coffee and if the water is unsuitable in your building (ours is often brown) you'll need to bring your own water. My agency won't even pay for dishsoap in the breakroom to wash up after lunch- that's an item for "personal use" so you'll pay for that too.
And unlike the private sector where you can wear relatively inexpensive and comfortable clothing like jeans and a sweater, you'll likely need suits for daily wear, and they will need to be dry cleaned.
And most places make you pay for parking.
By the time you've paid into your pension, tsp, health care, etc and the recurring expenses of parking, buying jackets and laundering them, etc, you'll see very little of that 87k.
Also, you can do very little work from home in this field. You can't even have your cell phone with you most of the day. You're literally lucky to see a window or sunlight in some cases.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry for hijacking this thread but is related to the topic.
Is it worth going from $190k+ job to accept a GS-14 position? I currently have 26 days for annual leave, I would need to see if the agency would start me off at 8 hrs per pay period accrual rate. Worth the negotiation to at least see if I could start at Step 10 and 8 hour leave accrual? My current company has both 401k and pension benefits so other benefits are not a decision factor.
Worth it to even negotiate with HR?
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. I've worked 20 years in the type of work you're considering. When you call it a dream job, realize that is a correct term- your dream, not your reality.
It can be enormously interesting and you certainly can be empowered to make a significant difference. However it is not worth the pay cut you're considering. You also believe your relative age is an advantage, and you are wrong. While it won't hurt you, it also won't weigh in your favor. You'll be facing genuine competition from 23 year olds. For example, I made 15 by age 30, and not because there was a lack of older competition.
I think more broadly, you have a good job, good benefits, good boss- you are not promised that. Federal compensation degrades every year. Ask them how much you'll be paying into the pension plan. Unless you're on an unusual pay plan, you'll get sticker shock. Example- as someone who has been in and grandfather into the old system, I pay about $50 every 2 weeks. A new person making the same amount pays $600 every 2 weeks. That's just for the pension- you'll also need to fund your TSP. Oh, and check out the premiums on health insurance.
As a private sector person, you're probably also used to things like having coffee at the office, at a minimum. Literally nothing is free in the government. You will pay all your own coffee and if the water is unsuitable in your building (ours is often brown) you'll need to bring your own water. My agency won't even pay for dishsoap in the breakroom to wash up after lunch- that's an item for "personal use" so you'll pay for that too.
And unlike the private sector where you can wear relatively inexpensive and comfortable clothing like jeans and a sweater, you'll likely need suits for daily wear, and they will need to be dry cleaned.
And most places make you pay for parking.
By the time you've paid into your pension, tsp, health care, etc and the recurring expenses of parking, buying jackets and laundering them, etc, you'll see very little of that 87k.
Also, you can do very little work from home in this field. You can't even have your cell phone with you most of the day. You're literally lucky to see a window or sunlight in some cases.
Anonymous wrote:So let's assume you work for a USAID/INL/PRM-type contractor and got into either State or USAID Foreign Service.
FSOs often have to spend very little money out of pocket for day to day life and end up being able to buy real estate investment properties and build significant savings, while counting down to a guaranteed pension. It's a really good deal. That said, they are an entitled bunch who learn how to nickel and dime the government for everything (within regulations).
Your contractor employer may offer similar benefits at first glance, but without the security and pension.
FSOs are a smart bunch in general but within a strictly defined system.
I would join USAID Foreign Service before I'd join State if I weren't sure if I wanted to commit to a whole career. USAID FSOs move up more quickly and get more independent responsibility much earlier than State FSOs. A USAID FSO may be leading an office in his second tour, or would be the deputy for the office. My sense is it takes longer in State -- many are reporting officers for several tours.
At State, of course you'd have to do a Consular tour adjudicating visas for a couple years -- fine if you're in it long term, but I bummer if you want to try out Foreign Service for a tour first.
Your spouse will be unemployed for stretches unless she's experienced and flexible enough to be put on proposals and project launches, etc. But she'd also be unemployed if OP started doing overseas tours with a contractor.
FS is relatively lucrative (for a middle class job) and you could always commit to five years and it probably won't hurt your chances of going back to contractor work (especially if you go into USAID FS).
Anonymous wrote:You need to sit down with your partner and discuss this. I have seen far too many FS or other agency trailing spouses end up embittered and resentful for their careers stalling. The government does not owe your partner a job, contrary to what many spouses think. Not all telework setups function properly for trailing spouses. Your partner might only be able to secure an administrative job at the embassy. Nurses and teachers always seem to do okay IME.
Then again, many spouses like working at the Embassy so they can keep an eye on their partners. Seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you’re going to travel and have you live abroad, you will do it early and the government will pick up your expenses - housing, etc. After a few years your new salary will have moved up and if you are smart, you will have banked much of your earlier salary. It’s apples and oranges. I took a job like that and in my low earning years I lived on the government’s dime. Came home and had a downpayment saved.
OP here - yep, I'm very aware of the government benefits while living abroad. I do have those sorts of options in my current job as well but of course huge prestige difference in being a contractor vs. 'real' government employee.
Definitely struggling with this choice as this offer was a life-long dream of mine but the pay cut just feels insulting.
Is it just you? Do you have a significant other? Kids?
If it’s a lifelong dream, negotiate the offer. Build that bridge of what you need and what the employer needs. I wouldn’t get hung up on the numbers per se.
Just me and my partner but she has a very legit career and there is no way in hell I would ask her to be a "trailing spouse" and take some bullshit job abroad or permanently sacrifice her career. So would have to figure that one out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went from $79k to $161k in 5 years in govt. I took a cut to get my foot in the door. It might be worth it!
I also went up about $80k in around 5 years, but impression is that such a rapid increase is unusual.
Both cases above are exceptions. Study the GS pay scale. We go up only 1 step each year. After a while, we go up 1 step only every 2 years.
This resulted in me going up about $25k in 5 years. With an advanced degree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went from $79k to $161k in 5 years in govt. I took a cut to get my foot in the door. It might be worth it!
I also went up about $80k in around 5 years, but impression is that such a rapid increase is unusual.
Both cases above are exceptions. Study the GS pay scale. We go up only 1 step each year. After a while, we go up 1 step only every 2 years.
This resulted in me going up about $25k in 5 years. With an advanced degree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Negotiate. This is an offer.
OP should try and she may get a bit more, but there isn’t usually a whole lot of room with government offers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do your write proposals OP? Is your name in the proposals as key personnel?
Yes to both. I'm at/near the point in contracting where I'm a little underpaid - capable of getting offers $160k+ now, but am happy with my current project, team, and benefits so have turned those offers down. Overall though I hate being a contractor and being so disposable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Negotiate. This is an offer.
OP should try and she may get a bit more, but there isn’t usually a whole lot of room with government offers.