Anonymous wrote:So let's get some perspective here. Let's take Italy with its 60,000 million population. They now have 4,825 dead. That's .01% of the population. Tragic yes, but it doesn't look as scary as saying 53,500 diagnosed and 4,825 dead.
In other words, even as it rages in Italy, only 54K of the entire population (rounded up) is infected out 60 MILLION people.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not 2% of the population... *bangs head against wall*
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less than a 2 percent death rate. No need to overhype things. Shame on you.
Would you get on a plane if there was a 2 percent chance it would crash? Shame on YOU.
PP here, yes, I would.
Anonymous wrote:Less than a 2 percent death rate. No need to overhype things. Shame on you.
Anonymous wrote:Less than a 2 percent death rate. No need to overhype things. Shame on you.
Anonymous wrote:I am the only one who thinks this is a disastrous over-reaction prompted by the media.
Read the following articles and weep:
https://www.amgreatness.com/2020/03/19/dangerous-curves/
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less than a 2 percent death rate. No need to overhype things. Shame on you.
Yes if 80% of the country gets and a 2% death rate..that’s only 5.232 million deaths. That is not even close to the numbers of deaths in WW2.
That's more than the number of deaths in the US for WWII.
10 times the number of people who died in the US during WW2 (approx 500k).
This needs to be explained more to “common” folk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less than a 2 percent death rate. No need to overhype things. Shame on you.
2% is huge. Would you get on a plane or into a car if you had an 80% chance of merely being very uncomfortable, 18% of being injured to require hospitalization and possibly never fully recover and ONLY a 2% chance of death? Because by not stopping this in its tracks, you're saying we should all just get on that airplane.
It’s less than 2, probably considerably less than one. Current testing isn’t capturing asymptomatic who have made up about 50 percent of the infected population in the few areas where general population was tested.
Exactly. Peoples la k of understanding of statistics is mindblowing.
Anonymous wrote:Less than a 2 percent death rate. No need to overhype things. Shame on you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less than a 2 percent death rate. No need to overhype things. Shame on you.
Yes if 80% of the country gets and a 2% death rate..that’s only 5.232 million deaths. That is not even close to the numbers of deaths in WW2.
That's more than the number of deaths in the US for WWII.
10 times the number of people who died in the US during WW2 (approx 500k).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^PS, I’m even getting on a couple of planes this week.
That's just idiotic.
Why is the world do you think this is funny or in anyway something to be done at this time?
It’s also careless.
PP gets on plane.
Contracts corona.
Symptomless for 2 weeks, traipses around the country. Handing change to stores, opening doors that moms of nicu babies touch. Picks up can of soda, puts it back. Virus stays on these items for 1-4 days.
Corona doesn’t ever manifest in PP on plane.
But over the course of 30 days, 25 people are exposed inadvertently and do get sick.
They all need to be in a hospital. 12 people need a ventilator. There are on 6 available, which go to the healthiest and most likely to live. Ergo, 6 people die.
It’s irresponsible and careless to not quarantine. There is no cure, there is no government support to increase our capacity, and there is no way to test everyone to know who is and isn’t a carrier or has/hasn’t been exposed.