Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National lockdown is coming soon. I’d get her before it happens.
Why does your adult need to be with you during a lockdown?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what I would do. Drive down and pick her up. Also give money and supplies to her roommates, so that they do not have to bear the burden of not having a paying roommate.
Wut? The DD has presumably paid the rent and will keep paying it. There is no need for DD to pay for utilities that she will not use. Her roomies should buy their own food and supplies.
Anonymous wrote:National lockdown is coming soon. I’d get her before it happens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.
Oh man. I'd be worried to, and would also rather have my kid stay put than get on a plane.
I work with low income college students and am really frustrated with schools that are completely closing dorms. I'm near Boston, and we are expecting it get bad, but, to me, shelter in place seems like the better strategy.
My rough understanding is that the universities were informed by some government entity (can't remember which, maybe state dept of health) that they needed to lower density ASAP. BU and Northeastern allowed kids to stay on campus, though I wonder if they have a smaller portion of kids dorming compared to H, MIT, BC. I would have much preferred my kid to have stayed in the dorm, though someone must have really freaked out the colleges for them to make this decision.
I read somewhere that the universities w the dorm rooms, communal bathrooms, dining halls were like cruise ships on land and hence the need to disperse the kids.
It is. I can’t believe so many idiots are telling OP to leave her there.
She’s in an apartment. Reading is fundamental.
You think apt is virus free? It is no better. Insulting is not necessary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.
Oh man. I'd be worried to, and would also rather have my kid stay put than get on a plane.
I work with low income college students and am really frustrated with schools that are completely closing dorms. I'm near Boston, and we are expecting it get bad, but, to me, shelter in place seems like the better strategy.
My rough understanding is that the universities were informed by some government entity (can't remember which, maybe state dept of health) that they needed to lower density ASAP. BU and Northeastern allowed kids to stay on campus, though I wonder if they have a smaller portion of kids dorming compared to H, MIT, BC. I would have much preferred my kid to have stayed in the dorm, though someone must have really freaked out the colleges for them to make this decision.
I read somewhere that the universities w the dorm rooms, communal bathrooms, dining halls were like cruise ships on land and hence the need to disperse the kids.
It is. I can’t believe so many idiots are telling OP to leave her there.
She’s in an apartment. Reading is fundamental.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.
Oh man. I'd be worried to, and would also rather have my kid stay put than get on a plane.
I work with low income college students and am really frustrated with schools that are completely closing dorms. I'm near Boston, and we are expecting it get bad, but, to me, shelter in place seems like the better strategy.
My rough understanding is that the universities were informed by some government entity (can't remember which, maybe state dept of health) that they needed to lower density ASAP. BU and Northeastern allowed kids to stay on campus, though I wonder if they have a smaller portion of kids dorming compared to H, MIT, BC. I would have much preferred my kid to have stayed in the dorm, though someone must have really freaked out the colleges for them to make this decision.
I read somewhere that the universities w the dorm rooms, communal bathrooms, dining halls were like cruise ships on land and hence the need to disperse the kids.
It is. I can’t believe so many idiots are telling OP to leave her there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is working at an internship and they are not even letting them work remotely. I am worried.
That will change quickly
My kid is telling me that they don’t even have the interns set up to work remotely. Priority is full time employees. I am not happy that they would do this to interns.
What happens if your kid just quits?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is working at an internship and they are not even letting them work remotely. I am worried.
That will change quickly
My kid is telling me that they don’t even have the interns set up to work remotely. Priority is full time employees. I am not happy that they would do this to interns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.
Oh man. I'd be worried to, and would also rather have my kid stay put than get on a plane.
I work with low income college students and am really frustrated with schools that are completely closing dorms. I'm near Boston, and we are expecting it get bad, but, to me, shelter in place seems like the better strategy.
My rough understanding is that the universities were informed by some government entity (can't remember which, maybe state dept of health) that they needed to lower density ASAP. BU and Northeastern allowed kids to stay on campus, though I wonder if they have a smaller portion of kids dorming compared to H, MIT, BC. I would have much preferred my kid to have stayed in the dorm, though someone must have really freaked out the colleges for them to make this decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is working at an internship and they are not even letting them work remotely. I am worried.
That will change quickly
Anonymous wrote:My kid is working at an internship and they are not even letting them work remotely. I am worried.