Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I WOH but I think SAHM is the most neutral term you can use.
You identify with the work you do.
What do you do? I am a doctor.
What do you do? I am a full-time mom.
I would never call myself a SAHM, because I do not hear others call themselves a WOHM. We all are moms. I choose to spend more time with my kids than the WOHMs and when they were little I chose that they stayed at home with me instead of a childcare provider.
I literally just referred to myself as "WOH."
The "full-time mom" thing just sounds unnecessarily defensive to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I WOH but I think SAHM is the most neutral term you can use.
You identify with the work you do.
What do you do? I am a doctor.
What do you do? I am a full-time mom.
I would never call myself a SAHM, because I do not hear others call themselves a WOHM. We all are moms. I choose to spend more time with my kids than the WOHMs and when they were little I chose that they stayed at home with me instead of a childcare provider.
I literally just referred to myself as "WOH."
The "full-time mom" thing just sounds unnecessarily defensive to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I WOH but I think SAHM is the most neutral term you can use.
You identify with the work you do.
What do you do? I am a doctor.
What do you do? I am a full-time mom.
I would never call myself a SAHM, because I do not hear others call themselves a WOHM. We all are moms. I choose to spend more time with my kids than the WOHMs and when they were little I chose that they stayed at home with me instead of a childcare provider.
I literally just referred to myself as "WOH."
The "full-time mom" thing just sounds unnecessarily defensive to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I WOH but I think SAHM is the most neutral term you can use.
You identify with the work you do.
What do you do? I am a doctor.
What do you do? I am a full-time mom.
I would never call myself a SAHM, because I do not hear others call themselves a WOHM. We all are moms. I choose to spend more time with my kids than the WOHMs and when they were little I chose that they stayed at home with me instead of a childcare provider.
Are you the physician up-thread? Did you contribute to the other thread? Are you super religious? You really hate WOHMs, don't you? In your dark little stone of a heart, you think we have failed our children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I WOH but I think SAHM is the most neutral term you can use.
You identify with the work you do.
What do you do? I am a doctor.
What do you do? I am a full-time mom.
I would never call myself a SAHM, because I do not hear others call themselves a WOHM. We all are moms. I choose to spend more time with my kids than the WOHMs and when they were little I chose that they stayed at home with me instead of a childcare provider.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who says you need a “special passion” in order to have a job?
I would guess that most people don’t consider their jobs their passions and that is all right. They are satisfied with the knowledge that they are contributing to the world and their families.
Just get a job, anything.
Lol. My special passion is a roof over my head, food on the table and clothes for my kids.
LOL. My special passion is more and more education and college courses for myself, just so I become more informed. After all, a great education in the first place allowed me to make good amount of money in a few years, invest all of it and see it grow, and then take super-duper early retirement to stay at home with my kids. It has also allowed me to tutor my kids and guide them into great colleges and career. Raising successful kids that you can be proud of, having a great marriage and life, and having enough money for needs and wants is the reward I have got.
I am sure I will work if I need to to pay for a roof over my head, food on the table, clothes for my kids and medicines for the family. I would also work to provide college education for my kids. Thankfully, all of these things have been checked due to the fabulous education my parents paid for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I WOH but I think SAHM is the most neutral term you can use.
You identify with the work you do.
What do you do? I am a doctor.
What do you do? I am a full-time mom.
I would never call myself a SAHM, because I do not hear others call themselves a WOHM. We all are moms. I choose to spend more time with my kids than the WOHMs and when they were little I chose that they stayed at home with me instead of a childcare provider.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who says you need a “special passion” in order to have a job?
I would guess that most people don’t consider their jobs their passions and that is all right. They are satisfied with the knowledge that they are contributing to the world and their families.
Just get a job, anything.
You could contribute to the world by -
- recycling
- not eating meat
- not having more than two kids
- not using fertilizer, herbicide or pesticide
- making sure your kids are doing well academically
- volunteering
- driving a Prius
- eating local and organic produce
- not being obese
- walking more
- being educated
-not being on dole
- not wasting
- planting trees...
All of this is not what most WOH women do. So in essence they are not contributing to the world. Most importantly, if you have a high HHI, please do not take a low paying job that someone might need to sustain their family. Do not snatch the bread from the mouth of kids born in low HHI households.
Anonymous wrote:I WOH but I think SAHM is the most neutral term you can use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who says you need a “special passion” in order to have a job?
I would guess that most people don’t consider their jobs their passions and that is all right. They are satisfied with the knowledge that they are contributing to the world and their families.
Just get a job, anything.
If your family doesn’t benefit from the money, then how are you contributing to your family by working? You are just creating more stress, less flexibility, fewer vacations, and a smaller village of friends and extended family.
Doesn’t need the money /= couldn’t benefit from it
I am the pediatrician, not the OP, but I will tell you that our household would not benefit from the money.
So, if you take the money out of it, what’s the benefit of having two working parents? In my household, it would mean fewer holidays spent together, fewer family vacations, less time with extended family, and a higher stress level overall. So, I volunteer at a free clinic, but I don’t have a job outside the home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work now, but when I didn’t, I just said (if asked) “I don’t have a job.”
In think it’s particular capitalistic to insist that a person work if they don’t need the money. Is my only value to the world a paycheck? There are actually very few “jobs” that add value to the world, most jobs just push paper around and destroy the environment. My office building actually THROWS away half finished rolls of toilet paper (yes I stalk the janitor’s cart).
There is a weird irony in vilifying women who are caregivers and volunteers instead of corporate worker bees. I’m all for women working if they are improving the world with their job - I’m looking at you Margaret Atwood - but insisting that the world needs a random corporate lawyer over an involved and loving parent isn’t feminism, it’s illogical.
Have you ever had a hard time internalizing this? For my family it truly makes the most sense for me not to work for a pay check and I don’t but I feel incredibly guilty about it.
I would never be able to not work. I just don’t feel like it’s right.