It is semen, unless “male genetic material” is a euphemism for something else. “In January, attorneys for Carroll served an attorney for Trump with papers requesting a sample of his DNA to compare with male genetic material found on the black Donna Karan dress Carroll says she wore during the alleged encounter at Bergdorf's.” https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/07/politics/e-jean-carroll-trump-dna/index.html

So the PP who is claiming it’s just regular handshake transfer is LYING. Shocker.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

Trump denies ever having met her. If he was in sufficiently close contact with her to leave a collectible DNA sample on her dress, it pretty much destroys that claim.

Ok. So, as the PPP said, that would merely prove he shook hands with her at some point in time. So?

He accused her of lying and said he never met her.

He’s supposed to remember every person he ever shook hands with? This is the most ridiculous claim I think I’ve ever heard.

Then he shouldn’t defame someone, if he can’t remember due to his dementia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still can’t believe that this woman has a list of 21 men and boys she accuses of sexually assaulting her. Twenty-one. Let’s think about that for a moment.

https://www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html

Except she doesn’t. Read the article. Smh.

That’s exactly what she does. Have YOU read the article??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still can’t believe that this woman has a list of 21 men and boys she accuses of sexually assaulting her. Twenty-one. Let’s think about that for a moment.

https://www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html

Except she doesn’t. Read the article. Smh.

I did read the article, cringing throughout at the melodrama.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

Trump denies ever having met her. If he was in sufficiently close contact with her to leave a collectible DNA sample on her dress, it pretty much destroys that claim.

Ok. So, as the PPP said, that would merely prove he shook hands with her at some point in time. So?

He accused her of lying and said he never met her.

He’s supposed to remember every person he ever shook hands with? This is the most ridiculous claim I think I’ve ever heard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

Please link to “what you have read” that says the DNA is not semen.

Anonymous wrote:I still can’t believe that this woman has a list of 21 men and boys she accuses of sexually assaulting her. Twenty-one. Let’s think about that for a moment.

https://www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html

Except she doesn’t. Read the article. Smh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

Trump denies ever having met her. If he was in sufficiently close contact with her to leave a collectible DNA sample on her dress, it pretty much destroys that claim.

Ok. So, as the PPP said, that would merely prove he shook hands with her at some point in time. So?

He accused her of lying and said he never met her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

Trump denies ever having met her. If he was in sufficiently close contact with her to leave a collectible DNA sample on her dress, it pretty much destroys that claim.

Ok. So, as the PPP said, that would merely prove he shook hands with her at some point in time. So?

I still can’t believe that this woman has a list of 21 men and boys she accuses of sexually assaulting her. Twenty-one. Let’s think about that for a moment.

https://www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

I’m wondering why you didn’t answer the PP’s question?
-NP

DP. There was a giant thread about her and her accusation when she first came out with it and this was discussed ad nauseam, as it always is when someone comes forward with an older accusation. Go read her initial interview if you actually want to know the answer.
https://www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/jean-carroll-trump-sexual-assault.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

Trump denies ever having met her. If he was in sufficiently close contact with her to leave a collectible DNA sample on her dress, it pretty much destroys that claim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

I’m wondering why you didn’t answer the PP’s question?
-NP

And I'm wondering why the PP asked the question instead of answering the original question.
-NP

What’s there to answer? If he isn’t guilty what’s he afraid of?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

OK. Humor me.
Let's say Trump submits DNA. And, let's say it comes back as likely his.
What does that prove?

From what I have read, the DNA in question is on the sleeve of the dress.
And, unlike the Clinton - Lewinsky scandal, it is not semen.

So, what would DNA that is not semen on the sleeve of a dress prove?
That he shook hands with her?

DP. This is so interesting to me - I thought she was claiming to have his semen on her dress. What is it, exactly, that she has on her dress? And how on earth could anything prove she was raped by him? This lady is loonier than I previously thought!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Consider, a woman who accuses the president of rape says she has DNA evidence to corroborate the allegation, and the president, who denies it, has enlisted DOJ to help him avoid providing the DNA evidence that, if he weren’t lying, would exonerate him.

Imagine believing the nutcase E Jean Carroll.
No way would I provide DNA to this crazy person and her lawyers.

If Trump is innocent, why won't he just submit the DNA sample if this would supposedly exonerate him? Seems to me that would be a bigger way to discredit E Jean Carroll.

Why did she not report it 30 years ago?

Why not submit his DNA sample now? DNA doesn’t lie.

I’m wondering why you didn’t answer the PP’s question?
-NP

And I'm wondering why the PP asked the question instead of answering the original question.
-NP