Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t she belong to St Anthony’s Catholic Church,
where they have a school?
And?
Not always, but Catholics typically send their child to the school of their parish.
Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
Anonymous wrote:Most families I know would never send their kids there but that was 10 years ago. Maybe it has gotten better but I haven’t first hand accounts. 10 years ago it had a more Georgia ave vibe than 16th street
Anonymous wrote:Well, this certainly settles the question of whether Shephard will continue to feed to Deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
And there you have, hypocrisy and “equity for all” in the highest regard on display.
Not so fast there. The chancellor is IB for Shepherd/Deal/Wilson. Any choice that he's made to send his kid elsewhere isn't for lack of a good option by geography. Different kids need different things. Give a parent a break - you have no idea what his kids are like.
If the chancellor’s child had SPED issues I’m sure the law covers privacy matters if his child were enrolled in DCPS.
If DCPS were truly servicing SPED families the way they were supposed to, then wouldn’t DCPS be adequate & resourceful enough to meet the needs of his SPED child?
The real issue here is that the mayor and DCPS is still reeling from its gaff from the previous two chancellors and departure of Amanda Alexander. So private was the best option to keep everyone happy.
Pretty sure his child is at Walls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
And there you have, hypocrisy and “equity for all” in the highest regard on display.
Not so fast there. The chancellor is IB for Shepherd/Deal/Wilson. Any choice that he's made to send his kid elsewhere isn't for lack of a good option by geography. Different kids need different things. Give a parent a break - you have no idea what his kids are like.
If the chancellor’s child had SPED issues I’m sure the law covers privacy matters if his child were enrolled in DCPS.
If DCPS were truly servicing SPED families the way they were supposed to, then wouldn’t DCPS be adequate & resourceful enough to meet the needs of his SPED child?
The real issue here is that the mayor and DCPS is still reeling from its gaff from the previous two chancellors and departure of Amanda Alexander. So private was the best option to keep everyone happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
And there you have, hypocrisy and “equity for all” in the highest regard on display.
Not so fast there. The chancellor is IB for Shepherd/Deal/Wilson. Any choice that he's made to send his kid elsewhere isn't for lack of a good option by geography. Different kids need different things. Give a parent a break - you have no idea what his kids are like.
If the chancellor’s child had SPED issues I’m sure the law covers privacy matters if his child were enrolled in DCPS.
If DCPS were truly servicing SPED families the way they were supposed to, then wouldn’t DCPS be adequate & resourceful enough to meet the needs of his SPED child?
The real issue here is that the mayor and DCPS is still reeling from its gaff from the previous two chancellors and departure of Amanda Alexander. So private was the best option to keep everyone happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
And there you have, hypocrisy and “equity for all” in the highest regard on display.
Not so fast there. The chancellor is IB for Shepherd/Deal/Wilson. Any choice that he's made to send his kid elsewhere isn't for lack of a good option by geography. Different kids need different things. Give a parent a break - you have no idea what his kids are like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
White’s older kid goes to their IB DCPS.
This. His only school aged kid goes to their IB (mentioned here). Bad reporting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
White’s older kid goes to their IB DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
And there you have, hypocrisy and “equity for all” in the highest regard on display.
Anonymous wrote:I did not know the chancellors kid isn’t in his IB, that McDuffie send his kids to private, and White wouldn’t answer the question when the Post asked.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone think Bowser won't win the pre-K3 lottery for her kid?
I mean, they have to rig it for her, right? Does the Mayor get a special dispensation in the lottery?