Anonymous wrote:OP here. I think having a second child will be good for my son, but I want to wait closer to the year mark. I had an easy pregnant with a healthy baby. We got pregnant 3 months into trying, but I don’t know how long it will take with another one. I have known women who got pregnant between 4-8 months, and some who got pregnant while breastfeeding. I plan to stop breastfeeding around six months for other reasons. We do have an easy baby, but that can easily change. I don’t worry about a difficult second baby since I have a lot of help from my husband, family, and we can hire childcare. We are also big proponents for sleep training if we have a difficult sleeper. I still prefer to wait a little longer.
Anonymous wrote:Ha! Mine did too. I scheduled a vasectomy for him. I hate being miserable as phuck while being pregnant. And, before you bssh me, would you like to spend almost 20 weeks on strict bed rest, have hyperemesis and be on a pick line, go to doc visits every week and have extreme anxiety due to multiple previous losses. I think it was selfish of him to want a third child and disregard what I have to go through.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have several friends who have 2 easy babies, so it absolutely can happen. I think some people just have laid back personalities and make laid back kids. That said, I would wait until a year because 6 month olds are pretty easy (if they sleep well) and misleading as to the energy required once they get mobile.
If you’re breastfeeding, your period may not yet have returned, and so you are less likely to get pregnant until you wean. But odds go up if your baby is not breastfeeding overnight.
OP here. I am breastfeeding but he is combo fed. He sleeps from 8-7 and eats 5 times a day. I'm not really that concerned if the second child will be easy. I think any child can be easy at one stage, and then hard the next stage. I have heard that laid back parents result in laid back babies, and high strung parents result in high strung babies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can, give your child a sibling. That's the best thing you can do for your child.
100% agree. Nothing worse than an only child. And before all the single children out there that are about to disagree with me, it absolutely normal to feel the way you do simply because you don’t know the difference your life would have been. What’s worse is if a single child has to go through a parents divorce, and yes 50% will.
C’mon. Are you trolling? There are plenty of siblings who don’t even have decent relationships. Your post is silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have several friends who have 2 easy babies, so it absolutely can happen. I think some people just have laid back personalities and make laid back kids. That said, I would wait until a year because 6 month olds are pretty easy (if they sleep well) and misleading as to the energy required once they get mobile.
If you’re breastfeeding, your period may not yet have returned, and so you are less likely to get pregnant until you wean. But odds go up if your baby is not breastfeeding overnight.
OP here. I am breastfeeding but he is combo fed. He sleeps from 8-7 and eats 5 times a day. I'm not really that concerned if the second child will be easy. I think any child can be easy at one stage, and then hard the next stage. I have heard that laid back parents result in laid back babies, and high strung parents result in high strung babies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d just got for it. Worst (or best?) case scenario is they are 15 months apart, but it’s way more likely that it takes a couple months, or you go through a miscarriage first.
This simply isn’t true, and there is no evidence you have to support this wild assertion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would wait to 12 months.
Yes - not that much time in terms of your fertility but HUGE difference for your kids.
OP here. I want to wait until a year before we start trying for another one.
your body, your choice OP!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how desperately you want another kid and how much or little you value other things in your life.
I value my career, appearance and marriage A LOT so I wouldn’t be okay having two young children. It would make it much harder for me to be successful at work, spend time not with kids with my husband and stay below my goal weight. Not to mention college savings for the first.
Some women seem to just not care and value having that second baby.
Wow. How shallow can you get?
I give you that appearance is superficial. However it’s somewhat related to my sex life, which I don’t consider to be shallow. My marriage is important and sex is a requirement for a happy marriage.
But how is my career or marriage shallow? Plenty of parents on this board have serious marital issues that don’t seemed to be helped by children. Many marriages end up in divorce. We all know that having children (especially close in age) negatively affects a woman’s career. These are all valid concerns for someone wanting to live a nice and less stressful life. If you aren’t concerned about college savings, staying married or happiness then sure, go on and have another right away!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how desperately you want another kid and how much or little you value other things in your life.
I value my career, appearance and marriage A LOT so I wouldn’t be okay having two young children. It would make it much harder for me to be successful at work, spend time not with kids with my husband and stay below my goal weight. Not to mention college savings for the first.
Some women seem to just not care and value having that second baby.
Wow. How shallow can you get?