Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will dissent. I was incapacitated after my vaginal births. To doctors I had minor complication. To my vagina, these were MAJOR things like a huge tear. I could not walk very far. No way I could have worked. I was not strolling to Starbucks to gaze at the baby and drink lattes. I was in MEDICAL recovery, the same way a dude who has a hernia operation is. Some of them are up and about a day or 2 later, some of them take weeks to recover. Yet, The Dude is covered with paid time off. My vagina was given no such time.
It doesn't hurt to ask. I'd do it.
What do you mean by that? If you are Feds, either of you would have the ability to use sick leave to cover these illnesses/injuries. If either of you are out of sick leave/or annual leave, then you would be out of luck. I don't understand the gender imbalance you are trying to draw here.
Anonymous wrote:I will dissent. I was incapacitated after my vaginal births. To doctors I had minor complication. To my vagina, these were MAJOR things like a huge tear. I could not walk very far. No way I could have worked. I was not strolling to Starbucks to gaze at the baby and drink lattes. I was in MEDICAL recovery, the same way a dude who has a hernia operation is. Some of them are up and about a day or 2 later, some of them take weeks to recover. Yet, The Dude is covered with paid time off. My vagina was given no such time.
It doesn't hurt to ask. I'd do it.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't give you any of my days just because there is always someone literally dying of cancer who needs them. Or getting a lung transplant or going across state to bury their child etc etc. All real life examples in my agency. I save them for those in crisis.
Anonymous wrote:OP, it seems to be agency dependent. At the agency I worked at when I was a Fed, people frequently requested leave for the 6-8w period after birth. It is a medically-indicated leave period, and it's totally within the rules of requesting leave. Where I worked, most people knew why the leave was requested, and no one has to donate if they don't want to. I can say that I know a couple of people who remember fondly the people that donated leave in these situations.
As you can see by this thread, though, at other agencies this is considered some kind of crime against humanity. I personally don't think it is, but you should find out the norms at *your* agency before deciding what to do. It might be totally fine where you are, and it would be a shame to miss out if that's the case.
Anonymous wrote:In poor form If you were asking for your fourth month covered, but no way in hell will you be in any shape to go back to work 2 weeks after kid 1. You are just as much in need as someone who had surgery