Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. It’s not because I’m a climate change denier or don’t support efforts to address climate change. It’s because the protesters have no clear goal in mind. You have to have some sort of tangible thing you can point to for policy makers to do in order for a protest to have any chance at effecting change. Otherwise, you are just pitching a public fit and disrupting other people’s lives with no real purpose behind it. It’s the same problem I have with BLM and the Women’s Marches. Protesting in the last several years seems to be more about providing an emotional outlet to vent frustration than actually improve situations. It’s, therefore, pointless and ineffective for anyone except the individual protester. That’s not something I want my kids to be a part of.
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not. It’s not because I’m a climate change denier or don’t support efforts to address climate change. It’s because the protesters have no clear goal in mind. You have to have some sort of tangible thing you can point to for policy makers to do in order for a protest to have any chance at effecting change. Otherwise, you are just pitching a public fit and disrupting other people’s lives with no real purpose behind it. It’s the same problem I have with BLM and the Women’s Marches. Protesting in the last several years seems to be more about providing an emotional outlet to vent frustration than actually improve situations. It’s, therefore, pointless and ineffective for anyone except the individual protester. That’s not something I want my kids to be a part of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine the outrage is students were encouraged to attend the pro-life march that happens every year?
Imagine if public school superintendents allowed "excused absences" for this event.
well, this is science-based, not faith-based.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine the outrage is students were encouraged to attend the pro-life march that happens every year?
Imagine if public school superintendents allowed "excused absences" for this event.
well, this is science-based, not faith-based.
Not really. There are just as many credible scientists who think you're all a bit crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine the outrage is students were encouraged to attend the pro-life march that happens every year?
Imagine if public school superintendents allowed "excused absences" for this event.
well, this is science-based, not faith-based.
Not really. There are just as many credible scientists who think you're all a bit crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting to hear climate denial piping up in this thread.
Greta Thunberg is anything but depressed these days, have you
missed the zillions of recent photos of her smiling face?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friend posted a video of his K and 2nd grader doing this, he was so proud. I thought it was so dumb. Why you'd take a kid to protest something they haven't even learned about, let alone get them tied up in political causes is such a ridiculous elitist DC thing to do.
what about the hundreds of thousands of kids who participated around the world? are they ridiculous and elitist? I think it's awesome to start conversations with kids about tough issues that will require their voices to effect (and hopefully sustain) change. I think you're underestimating kids and the impact of events like this. I still remember seeing my older sister go to marches when she was in HS and I was in elementary. taught me the importance of voice in a democracy.
What if you have no concept yet 1) what the climate is, 2) the science behind any of it changing, 3) what a democracy is?
I think for a high school kid it's great, maybe even middle. A second grader would be better served by just going to school and learning.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting to hear climate denial piping up in this thread.
Greta Thunberg is anything but depressed these days, have you
missed the zillions of recent photos of her smiling face?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friend posted a video of his K and 2nd grader doing this, he was so proud. I thought it was so dumb. Why you'd take a kid to protest something they haven't even learned about, let alone get them tied up in political causes is such a ridiculous elitist DC thing to do.
what about the hundreds of thousands of kids who participated around the world? are they ridiculous and elitist? I think it's awesome to start conversations with kids about tough issues that will require their voices to effect (and hopefully sustain) change. I think you're underestimating kids and the impact of events like this. I still remember seeing my older sister go to marches when she was in HS and I was in elementary. taught me the importance of voice in a democracy.
What if you have no concept yet 1) what the climate is, 2) the science behind any of it changing, 3) what a democracy is?
I think for a high school kid it's great, maybe even middle. A second grader would be better served by just going to school and learning.
I would hope that someone would explain what was going on and why they were there. Lots of chances to have age appropriate conversations about that. the reopened dinosaur exhibit at the natural history museum sparked that conversation with my kids. It's like any topic. they might not dive into all the ins and outs, but if you want to, you can introduce big ideas to them. If you don't, you don't, but you don't have to assume people are being ridiculous and elitist just because they are parenting in a different way than you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine the outrage is students were encouraged to attend the pro-life march that happens every year?
Imagine if public school superintendents allowed "excused absences" for this event.
well, this is science-based, not faith-based.