Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are currently caring for my elderly inlaws. It's been about 5 years since caring for my parents...which was all consuming while we were still working but had just become empty nesters. They passed away.
Now we just retired and we are involved in a huge tsunami of issues my inlaws just got...much of it self induced because of denial.
You would not believe our friends' comments:
"This is your retirement. You shouldnt be doing that."
" They created their own problems- don't enable them by going over there."
" Let him take an Uber to the radiology appt for chemo- it's not your job."
" You can never come out- what a shame they did this to you."
" Why can't your brother take off from work? Too bad!"
Their parents have died over the years. There's a sentiment of feeling "lucky" if parents have already passed that I seem to feel in many social circles.
We are becoming an entitled society. No empathy. Other people are throw aways. They shouldn't be interfering in our lives, as we deserve to live ours in freedom....that is what the message is.
I do not love my inlaws. They are super PITA to unbelievable degrees. I still do not feel that it is my right to not help them, and I am very saddened by those who do. Who will help us in 25 years?
I have watched many a relative become quite ill while being the chosen one for doing the most caregiving and receiving the most horrible behavior from their elderly parents. I have known quite a few people who received their cancer diagnosis within a year of being done caregiving for an elderly parent who was difficult. I think everyone has to find the right balance. As I have seen with my own caregiving empathy often leaves/detriorates as the brain ages and the parents will suck you dry emotionally and physically if you let them. It was a lot easier to do more for the parent who was pleasant. For the difficult parent it can leave an emotional hangover and physical symptoms. I think each person has to find what they can handle and part of that is dependent on the personality they are working with. Those who judge anyone doing caregiving should think twice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my kids at 45 and they are in elementary school. My father died this year and my mother, while still living on her own and in good mental health, has been dealing with very serious cancer - so the clock is ticking loudly down to the next crisis.
I worry about what my kids will be saddled with, and I realize that worrying about that is a fairly pointless use of energy.
I work hard at being and staying healthy. My husband and I work hard to ensure we will be very well off in retirement. I will buy long term care insurance. I plan to move to a location with stepped up care options BEFORE i need such things. (And I desperately hope the options for that improve in the next 10-15 years.) I will talk with my kids about always putting the next generation first, if they end up having to make decisions about caring for me versus caring for my grandchildren.
I will do what I can to reduce the burden on them by ensuring there are ample financial reserves, I don't resist accepting help, and I let them know how I expect to be prioritized. And I have been and remain focused on doing everything I can to position my kids to be well-rounded people, with good/pragmatic heads on their shoulders, who know how to think about and have difficult conversations around illness, dying, etc...
I'll do my best and hope for the best and hope that my kids will have rich, full lives, in which I play an active healthy role for as long as possible, and then as manageable a strain at the end as possible.
I figure that's about all I can do.
The part highlighted sounds wonderful and my mom said the same thing until she needed me. Now with age her empathy has declined and she is offended that the grandchildren come first. The problem is cognitive issues can change our personalities so we become quite nasty and demanding with out adult kids.
We should all write down our wishes now to instruct our older selves.
Anonymous wrote:We are currently caring for my elderly inlaws. It's been about 5 years since caring for my parents...which was all consuming while we were still working but had just become empty nesters. They passed away.
Now we just retired and we are involved in a huge tsunami of issues my inlaws just got...much of it self induced because of denial.
You would not believe our friends' comments:
"This is your retirement. You shouldnt be doing that."
" They created their own problems- don't enable them by going over there."
" Let him take an Uber to the radiology appt for chemo- it's not your job."
" You can never come out- what a shame they did this to you."
" Why can't your brother take off from work? Too bad!"
Their parents have died over the years. There's a sentiment of feeling "lucky" if parents have already passed that I seem to feel in many social circles.
We are becoming an entitled society. No empathy. Other people are throw aways. They shouldn't be interfering in our lives, as we deserve to live ours in freedom....that is what the message is.
I do not love my inlaws. They are super PITA to unbelievable degrees. I still do not feel that it is my right to not help them, and I am very saddened by those who do. Who will help us in 25 years?
Anonymous wrote:When my youngest is in their 50s, I will hopefully have made it to my 90’s. I guess I rationalize it by knowing that they (my kids) will not be in their 70s trying to navigate my elder care if needed and will be free from that burden by the time they have to worry about their own care
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my kids at 45 and they are in elementary school. My father died this year and my mother, while still living on her own and in good mental health, has been dealing with very serious cancer - so the clock is ticking loudly down to the next crisis.
I worry about what my kids will be saddled with, and I realize that worrying about that is a fairly pointless use of energy.
I work hard at being and staying healthy. My husband and I work hard to ensure we will be very well off in retirement. I will buy long term care insurance. I plan to move to a location with stepped up care options BEFORE i need such things. (And I desperately hope the options for that improve in the next 10-15 years.) I will talk with my kids about always putting the next generation first, if they end up having to make decisions about caring for me versus caring for my grandchildren.
I will do what I can to reduce the burden on them by ensuring there are ample financial reserves, I don't resist accepting help, and I let them know how I expect to be prioritized. And I have been and remain focused on doing everything I can to position my kids to be well-rounded people, with good/pragmatic heads on their shoulders, who know how to think about and have difficult conversations around illness, dying, etc...
I'll do my best and hope for the best and hope that my kids will have rich, full lives, in which I play an active healthy role for as long as possible, and then as manageable a strain at the end as possible.
I figure that's about all I can do.
The part highlighted sounds wonderful and my mom said the same thing until she needed me. Now with age her empathy has declined and she is offended that the grandchildren come first. The problem is cognitive issues can change our personalities so we become quite nasty and demanding with out adult kids.
We should all write down our wishes now to instruct our older selves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my kids at 45 and they are in elementary school. My father died this year and my mother, while still living on her own and in good mental health, has been dealing with very serious cancer - so the clock is ticking loudly down to the next crisis.
I worry about what my kids will be saddled with, and I realize that worrying about that is a fairly pointless use of energy.
I work hard at being and staying healthy. My husband and I work hard to ensure we will be very well off in retirement. I will buy long term care insurance. I plan to move to a location with stepped up care options BEFORE i need such things. (And I desperately hope the options for that improve in the next 10-15 years.) I will talk with my kids about always putting the next generation first, if they end up having to make decisions about caring for me versus caring for my grandchildren.
I will do what I can to reduce the burden on them by ensuring there are ample financial reserves, I don't resist accepting help, and I let them know how I expect to be prioritized. And I have been and remain focused on doing everything I can to position my kids to be well-rounded people, with good/pragmatic heads on their shoulders, who know how to think about and have difficult conversations around illness, dying, etc...
I'll do my best and hope for the best and hope that my kids will have rich, full lives, in which I play an active healthy role for as long as possible, and then as manageable a strain at the end as possible.
I figure that's about all I can do.
The part highlighted sounds wonderful and my mom said the same thing until she needed me. Now with age her empathy has declined and she is offended that the grandchildren come first. The problem is cognitive issues can change our personalities so we become quite nasty and demanding with out adult kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s a correlation between the gene that allows long fertility (older natural pregnancy) and the gene linked to longevity.
My mom has me in her mid 40s as a “whoops” baby. She’s in her 90s and basically fine health-wise. Her mom had her in her 30’s as a first baby, and she had no dementia at all until well past 100. So genetics plays a role.
Your reference to "the gene" is nonsense. Nobody has identified such gene(s). The rest is far from settled although there are indications that having a few children is better for women's longevity than none or many children.
Grandma had 7, last at 42. Is alive at 97. Go figure. My Mom, her daughter, died at 72 quick cancer. It’s a crapshoot.
Here's one of the studies, although there are several more that can be easily found online. My family members were involved in one of the earliest big studies regarding super-longevity and that correlation was one of their notable findings, so I have followed the research that grew out of it a bit. They haven't identified a specific gene, but there's a strong correlation found in multiple studies and the hypothesis is that there is a gene or combination of genes that basically slows the aging process resulting in longer fertility as well as delayed dementia and longer life. I agree with PP that cancer is a total wildcard, though. The relative that was involved in the study had a mother who died at 80 due to breast cancer (before it was really treated) -- without the breast cancer, maybe she would have lived to be 100, like her mother and her daughters.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270889/
NP. I'm familiar with this research. I think it is important to point out that, historically, women who were getting and staying pregnant in their 40s were doing so without any artificial reproductive technology. They got pregnant on their own, and they stayed pregnant on their own. So yeah, for those women, this probably was true.
Today, it is a very different story. Science allows many of us to have children far later than we otherwise would have. In other words, you're going to have a lot of older parents walking around who don't have whatever mystery gene there might be that will help with their longevity.
Anonymous wrote:I had my kids at 45 and they are in elementary school. My father died this year and my mother, while still living on her own and in good mental health, has been dealing with very serious cancer - so the clock is ticking loudly down to the next crisis.
I worry about what my kids will be saddled with, and I realize that worrying about that is a fairly pointless use of energy.
I work hard at being and staying healthy. My husband and I work hard to ensure we will be very well off in retirement. I will buy long term care insurance. I plan to move to a location with stepped up care options BEFORE i need such things. (And I desperately hope the options for that improve in the next 10-15 years.) I will talk with my kids about always putting the next generation first, if they end up having to make decisions about caring for me versus caring for my grandchildren.
I will do what I can to reduce the burden on them by ensuring there are ample financial reserves, I don't resist accepting help, and I let them know how I expect to be prioritized. And I have been and remain focused on doing everything I can to position my kids to be well-rounded people, with good/pragmatic heads on their shoulders, who know how to think about and have difficult conversations around illness, dying, etc...
I'll do my best and hope for the best and hope that my kids will have rich, full lives, in which I play an active healthy role for as long as possible, and then as manageable a strain at the end as possible.
I figure that's about all I can do.
Anonymous wrote:I’m right in the middle of the sandwich and I’m extremely worried about this. I’m 45, with a 5 year old child, and a 75 year old mom with health issues (79 year old dad is acting as the main caregiver). My mom had to deal with the same issues when she was in her 30s and 40s, while I was young (my grandmother was 30 when my mom was born), due to her dad’s dementia which started in his 60s. I’m adding an additional ten year gap compared to the prior generations so I”m really worried about what my child will have to deal with as I age.
This has actually motivated me to try one of those dna kits to see if I am predisposed to any diseases, and I’m inclined to start following a Mediterranean diet linked to reduced risk of dementia. I would love to exercise regularly and make other health related changes but the demands of work paired with the sandwich situation take up all my time. And I”m inclined to start a separate savings/investment account, independent of my 401k, designated for these types of future health issues. One saving grace is that my parents are not (yet) in need of financial help, and i don’t ever want my daughter to have to bear a financial burden for my care.