Anonymous wrote:
Yes, that is true, but his salary is comparable to other league - most of it is a bonus. Which leads me to wonder why such a bonus is necessary, if other leagues can retain talent without it. My kids play for Alexandria, and while I've been very happy with it generally, I'm irritated at being asked to help with fundraising when the league already has money lying around to pay this kind of a bonus. I'm busy and don't intend to put more any time into fundraising for ASA in the near future light of this.
The salary is not comparable to anything in the area. He’s basically stealing from the kids and club.
You clearly don't understand the distinction between a salary and a bonus. I agree that his overall compensation, consisting of both salary and bonus, is greater than other directors. However, his salary is comparable to other directors. What is different is the bonus. It would be interesting/useful to learn how that is calculated or determined, and whether ASA is obligated to continue giving him comparable bonuses in the future under whatever arrangement determined it.
Yes, that is true, but his salary is comparable to other league - most of it is a bonus. Which leads me to wonder why such a bonus is necessary, if other leagues can retain talent without it. My kids play for Alexandria, and while I've been very happy with it generally, I'm irritated at being asked to help with fundraising when the league already has money lying around to pay this kind of a bonus. I'm busy and don't intend to put more any time into fundraising for ASA in the near future light of this.
The salary is not comparable to anything in the area. He’s basically stealing from the kids and club.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Alexandria ED does indeed make north of $300K.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organiz...2413/201811359349309756/IRS990
Yes, that is true, but his salary is comparable to other league - most of it is a bonus. Which leads me to wonder why such a bonus is necessary, if other leagues can retain talent without it. My kids play for Alexandria, and while I've been very happy with it generally, I'm irritated at being asked to help with fundraising when the league already has money lying around to pay this kind of a bonus. I'm busy and don't intend to put more any time into fundraising for ASA in the near future light of this.
Quick lesson. Clubs are not Leagues.
A league is a organization that club team play in. Alexandria is a club that has teams who play in leagues like CCL and EDP.
Distinction without a difference. I think the position on the floor is that no club head should make that money, though we have no idea what else may be compensable at other clubs (do people get to run their own training and camp services outside the club, etc). Of course, we could have this debate about every occupation and level in the global economy. It tends to bring out the worst in people. Privilege. Envy. Self-righteousness. Ulterior motives. Entitlement. Etc. Apparently this matters a lot to people who aren't at the club. Their motives are suspect and obvious. For those in the club, it is a legitimate question to ask, and properly directed to the Board, with appropriate reference to what other club heads make with similar obligations and performance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Alexandria ED does indeed make north of $300K.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organiz...2413/201811359349309756/IRS990
Yes, that is true, but his salary is comparable to other league - most of it is a bonus. Which leads me to wonder why such a bonus is necessary, if other leagues can retain talent without it. My kids play for Alexandria, and while I've been very happy with it generally, I'm irritated at being asked to help with fundraising when the league already has money lying around to pay this kind of a bonus. I'm busy and don't intend to put more any time into fundraising for ASA in the near future light of this.
Quick lesson. Clubs are not Leagues.
A league is a organization that club team play in. Alexandria is a club that has teams who play in leagues like CCL and EDP.
Anonymous wrote:Alexandria ED does indeed make north of $300K.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organiz...2413/201811359349309756/IRS990
Yes, that is true, but his salary is comparable to other league - most of it is a bonus. Which leads me to wonder why such a bonus is necessary, if other leagues can retain talent without it. My kids play for Alexandria, and while I've been very happy with it generally, I'm irritated at being asked to help with fundraising when the league already has money lying around to pay this kind of a bonus. I'm busy and don't intend to put more any time into fundraising for ASA in the near future light of this.
Anonymous wrote:Alexandria ED does indeed make north of $300K.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organiz...2413/201811359349309756/IRS990
Yes, that is true, but his salary is comparable to other league - most of it is a bonus. Which leads me to wonder why such a bonus is necessary, if other leagues can retain talent without it. My kids play for Alexandria, and while I've been very happy with it generally, I'm irritated at being asked to help with fundraising when the league already has money lying around to pay this kind of a bonus. I'm busy and don't intend to put more any time into fundraising for ASA in the near future light of this.
Anonymous wrote:Do soccer coaches receive a bonus or assessed by their club based on a season’s wins and losses ?
Alexandria ED does indeed make north of $300K.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organiz...2413/201811359349309756/IRS990
Anonymous wrote:Girls can get to D1 via ECNL ... but yeah not likely getting to D1 with any money. HS soccer is more cost effective if DC just likes playing.[/quot
I've seen analysis that say about 5% of HS Boys will play in college, and about 10% of HS girls. From what I've seen locally (at Mclean), that seems about right. The girls ENCL teams place almost all of those players on college teams, and the Boys teams place maybe 1/2 of the players. So even at a pretty high level, it's about a 2:1 ration, girls to boys going on to college soccer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy carp. All my soccer teams when I was growing up in the Midwest were coached my volunteer parents!! I had no idea it was so common around here to pay coaches...
+1
My travel coach was a butcher and another one was a drywall guy. Approximately how much are parents paying per season? Do a large percentage go on to D1 or higher? This sounds crazy to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't the board have to vote to approve the ED Salary?
Not sure how that worked in this particular case, but normally yes. Typically there is a compensation committee that does a study of the market and proposes a salary to the board who than votes. In private enterprises that comp can be as crazy as the board wants to make it. In 501c3s there are lots of constraints on what can be done. Uncle Sam doesn't grant tax exemption status without trying to keep a lid on the crazy things folks come up with.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't the board have to vote to approve the ED Salary?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they are jerks to other adults, they are jerks to the kids as well
This is pretty dumb. Entire business empires are built on treating customers well and employees poorly.
I knew soccer was done once it started referring to kids as customers. I about had a heart attack when I heard my kid’s coach use that term. That alone implies a level of politics and appeasement. Developing athletes are not customers. The athlete has to perform or the athlete does not advance or play in the game. The Club that used this term has out of control politics with a “whine the loudest” policy or donate big to affect placement. Youth sports is a business. It’s no longer for the kids or about the kids.