Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher 35+ years public and private.
This would never, I mean never, happen. I'm calling OP out- this is not real. Even if someone thought that ( erroneously) they would not be allowed to say it, and certainly would not be inclined to do so after 6 hours. How stupid do you think respondents are here?
Try again and ask what you really want to know.
That's nice, but basically the exact thing happened to us as well. You may have a very limited frame of reference based on your own practices, but parents see a broader sample of teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some people’s first reaction.
Others immediately blame the parent for being in denial about possible issues.
I don’t think this actually happened but if it did, the teacher was out of line.
How does this conclusion about the teacher’s impropriety address the OP’s kid disturbing the class?
We only have that teacher’s version and if he/she actually made this call to a parent after six hours of observing this student on the first day of school - a day when a lot of kids are unusually excited, then I have little confidence in the teacher’s conclusions.
Though I agree with you that the teacher acted improperly.
If this actually happened.
So let’s say it happened. Teacher was obviously out of line. There - that’s resolved.
Now what is OP gonna do about her kid? Is she going to dismiss the appraisal altogether and ignore her child’s disruptive behavior because the teacher said something out of line or is she going to address the real issue her...her kid.
Anonymous wrote:People are focusing on the teacher BECAUSE the teacher was so out of line, that her judgement is completely unreliable.
Anonymous wrote:Typical.
Everyone 1st instinct is to analyze the teacher's behavior and address the issue with the teacher.
Anybody gonna stop to analyze the kid's behavior and pause to give some thought about addressing his issues first and foremost?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some people’s first reaction.
Others immediately blame the parent for being in denial about possible issues.
I don’t think this actually happened but if it did, the teacher was out of line.
How does this conclusion about the teacher’s impropriety address the OP’s kid disturbing the class?
We only have that teacher’s version and if he/she actually made this call to a parent after six hours of observing this student on the first day of school - a day when a lot of kids are unusually excited, then I have little confidence in the teacher’s conclusions.
Though I agree with you that the teacher acted improperly.
If this actually happened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some people’s first reaction.
Others immediately blame the parent for being in denial about possible issues.
I don’t think this actually happened but if it did, the teacher was out of line.
How does this conclusion about the teacher’s impropriety address the OP’s kid disturbing the class?
We only have that teacher’s version and if he/she actually made this call to a parent after six hours of observing this student on the first day of school - a day when a lot of kids are unusually excited, then I have little confidence in the teacher’s conclusions.
Though I agree with you that the teacher acted improperly.
If this actually happened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some people’s first reaction.
Others immediately blame the parent for being in denial about possible issues.
I don’t think this actually happened but if it did, the teacher was out of line.
How does this conclusion about the teacher’s impropriety address the OP’s kid disturbing the class?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you do rewlize the health forms are on file in the clinic? Teachers can check
PP retired school nurse and this isn't and should not be easily accessible information; it's confidential, protected health information and not accessible for teachers. I had no access to individual student records. Make sense?
Don’t be so thick. You weren’t a teacher so you obviously don’t know. Teachers collect the health forms, alphabetize them, and are the ones who turn them in! Of course they read them and are aware of any medications a child is on (in case kids need to go to clinic to get doses). They have to know who has diabetes, who has allergies, etc. In many cases, they have to be epi pen trained. So yes, teachers are always aware of health issues and medications students are on, especially if it impacts the classroom.
Huh? No. We submit health forms directly to the main office, and they are filed with the nurse. Yes, a teacher should know if there is a medication plan that she has a role in, but teachers absolutely should not be able to go through all past health forms in the files for any kid!
Anonymous wrote:Some people’s first reaction.
Others immediately blame the parent for being in denial about possible issues.
I don’t think this actually happened but if it did, the teacher was out of line.