Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For context, a teacher in HS was completely against the name Lisa. She told us it was trashy. There were three girls named Lisa in our class (it was the late 80s). She refused to call any of the girls Lisa. She called all of them Elizabeth, even the girl whose name was not a derivative of Elizabeth.
She also thought Susan was trashy and completely flew off the rails when a student pointed out the Biblical origins.
There are other girls’ names she thought were trashy (Jamie, Karen), that we don’t blink at today. Trashy is in the eye of the beholder.
But technically Brooklyn isn't actually a name for a person. The names you mentioned are real names for humans so I really don't think it's comparable.
Brooklyn is absolutely a name for a person, as evidenced by the fact that lots of people have the name. That's how something becomes a name. Furthermore, using place names for people, and creating names by putting together two other names (e.g. Anne-Marie) have long histories within American culture.
I can name my kid fireplace if I want. Or plate. Or France. It doesn't make it a name for a person. Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you should.
If you named your kid fireplace, lowercase letter and all, then that would be their name, so it would be a person's name. Not a good one, I will grant you that. France, on the other hand has a long history as a name in France. It's often combined as Marie-France (see that thing about taking 2 names and putting them together).
Anonymous wrote:I know someone who named her daughter Liberty!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aspirational white trash name. Dumb trendy. Madison used to be the Brooklyn.
+1 classy people do not give their children these names.
How do you measure class based on someone giving their child these names? I know quite a few people who have used both these names for no other reason than that they liked the sound of them. They are all highly educated, have great jobs(I know an architect and an engineer that both have a child named Brooklyn and my own pediatrician has a girl named Madison), are well liked and kind. So how are these people not classy? These are just common names now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aspirational white trash name. Dumb trendy. Madison used to be the Brooklyn.
+1 classy people do not give their children these names.
Anonymous wrote:Aspirational white trash name. Dumb trendy. Madison used to be the Brooklyn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brooklyn is cute and strong, Brook is a great nickname, I had a friend named Brook back in the 60s so it's been around for awhile. I do, however, draw the line at naming kids Queens or Staten Island.
Bronx?
No thonx!
There is a child out there with the unfortunate name of Bronx Mowgli (Ashlee Simpson's kid)
I taught a kid named Bronx a few years ago. He’s now a HS drop out trying to get famous on YouTube.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brooklyn is cute and strong, Brook is a great nickname, I had a friend named Brook back in the 60s so it's been around for awhile. I do, however, draw the line at naming kids Queens or Staten Island.
Bronx?
No thonx!
There is a child out there with the unfortunate name of Bronx Mowgli (Ashlee Simpson's kid)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For context, a teacher in HS was completely against the name Lisa. She told us it was trashy. There were three girls named Lisa in our class (it was the late 80s). She refused to call any of the girls Lisa. She called all of them Elizabeth, even the girl whose name was not a derivative of Elizabeth.
She also thought Susan was trashy and completely flew off the rails when a student pointed out the Biblical origins.
There are other girls’ names she thought were trashy (Jamie, Karen), that we don’t blink at today. Trashy is in the eye of the beholder.
But technically Brooklyn isn't actually a name for a person. The names you mentioned are real names for humans so I really don't think it's comparable.
Brooklyn is absolutely a name for a person, as evidenced by the fact that lots of people have the name. That's how something becomes a name. Furthermore, using place names for people, and creating names by putting together two other names (e.g. Anne-Marie) have long histories within American culture.
I can name my kid fireplace if I want. Or plate. Or France. It doesn't make it a name for a person. Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you should.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brooklyn is cute and strong, Brook is a great nickname, I had a friend named Brook back in the 60s so it's been around for awhile. I do, however, draw the line at naming kids Queens or Staten Island.
Bronx?
No thonx!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brooklyn is cute and strong, Brook is a great nickname, I had a friend named Brook back in the 60s so it's been around for awhile. I do, however, draw the line at naming kids Queens or Staten Island.
Bronx?
No thonx!
Anonymous wrote:Brooklyn sure beats Dumbo as a name.