Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

I know right? They were wrong about A.C.O.R.N. and -

oh wait. Veritas was 100% right on the scam-that-was ACORN.

They have been truthful on every other secret recording they have made - including the now-jailed activist who planned to sabotage the inauguration.

Google is operating as an unlicensed political lobbying organization.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

I know right? They were wrong about A.C.O.R.N. and -

oh wait. Veritas was 100% right on the scam-that-was ACORN.

They have been truthful on every other secret recording they have made - including the now-jailed activist who planned to sabotage the inauguration.

Google is operating as an unlicensed political lobbying organization.

Cruz points out Google donated 1.2 mil to Clinton and 0 to Trump

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

I know right? They were wrong about A.C.O.R.N. and -

oh wait. Veritas was 100% right on the scam-that-was ACORN.

They have been truthful on every other secret recording they have made - including the now-jailed activist who planned to sabotage the inauguration.

Google is operating as an unlicensed political lobbying organization.

Gennai admitted it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And before anyone brings up 'free market', a search engine should be neutral, i.e. people enter data and they get results. When a company starts manipulating results, they have crossed the line into opinion media and should be broken up/regulated. Warren is right in this regard.

Google is operating as an un-registered lobbyist.

#BreakUpGoogle

Google has its own lobbying arm already. It's why they have a presence in DC. It's no different than the NRA or farmers when it comes to lobbying.

Also, there are a lot of bogus articles and "fake" searches that cause certain websites to appear at the top of the search engine, ie manipulating results. Google tries to remove those in their algorithm but of course, aren't always successful. This is the "resources" that the employee was also referring to. You need a pretty powerful algorithm/machine to make sure the results aren't manipulated.

I always tell my children to not believe everything they google. Adults should do the same. Google search is a great tool, but people really need to look at it with their eyes wide open.

Or, you could always use a different search engine.

I already do

Google admitted they are deliberately altering search results. She said it straight out and why. Good Lord

If google knows that people are deliberately trying to manipulate search results or putting out "fake news" why wouldn't they try to fight against it?

Glad you are using a different search engine. Then no worries. If Trumpsters really believe that Google is evil then why do they keep using their products? There are alternatives you know.

I don't like walmart, so I don't go to their stores because there are alternatives. Trump told Americans to boycott Harley Davidson, so Trumpsters did. See how that works? You can boycott Google.

Are you dense? Google themselves are doing this. As policy. Not ‘people ‘.

– Specific examples of “accomplished Google bombs” show that the public is able to manipulate search results.

At the same time, politically motivated third parties including the “alt-right”, a far-right movement in the US, use a variety of techniques to trick the algorithm and push propaganda and misinformation higher up Google’s search rankings.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

I know right? They were wrong about A.C.O.R.N. and -

oh wait. Veritas was 100% right on the scam-that-was ACORN.

They have been truthful on every other secret recording they have made - including the now-jailed activist who planned to sabotage the inauguration.

Google is operating as an unlicensed political lobbying organization.

Cruz points out Google donated 1.2 mil to Clinton and 0 to Trump

Anonymous wrote:More insiders are going to O’Keefe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And before anyone brings up 'free market', a search engine should be neutral, i.e. people enter data and they get results. When a company starts manipulating results, they have crossed the line into opinion media and should be broken up/regulated. Warren is right in this regard.

Google is operating as an un-registered lobbyist.

#BreakUpGoogle

Google has its own lobbying arm already. It's why they have a presence in DC. It's no different than the NRA or farmers when it comes to lobbying.

Also, there are a lot of bogus articles and "fake" searches that cause certain websites to appear at the top of the search engine, ie manipulating results. Google tries to remove those in their algorithm but of course, aren't always successful. This is the "resources" that the employee was also referring to. You need a pretty powerful algorithm/machine to make sure the results aren't manipulated.

I always tell my children to not believe everything they google. Adults should do the same. Google search is a great tool, but people really need to look at it with their eyes wide open.

Or, you could always use a different search engine.

I already do

Google admitted they are deliberately altering search results. She said it straight out and why. Good Lord

If google knows that people are deliberately trying to manipulate search results or putting out "fake news" why wouldn't they try to fight against it?

Glad you are using a different search engine. Then no worries. If Trumpsters really believe that Google is evil then why do they keep using their products? There are alternatives you know.

I don't like walmart, so I don't go to their stores because there are alternatives. Trump told Americans to boycott Harley Davidson, so Trumpsters did. See how that works? You can boycott Google.

Anonymous wrote:More insiders are going to O’Keefe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

I know right? They were wrong about A.C.O.R.N. and -

oh wait. Veritas was 100% right on the scam-that-was ACORN.

They have been truthful on every other secret recording they have made - including the now-jailed activist who planned to sabotage the inauguration.

Google is operating as an unlicensed political lobbying organization.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jen Gennai ,Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation:


“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/24/google-exec-project-veritas-sting-says-only-big-te/


Google executive Jen Gennai responded to the video: “I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.” So she does admit saying what she said.

Congressman Louie Gohmert:  “Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped…”

Is this a grown woman peppering her speech with "likes"? Good grief.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

I know right? They were wrong about A.C.O.R.N. and -

oh wait. Veritas was 100% right on the scam-that-was ACORN.

They have been truthful on every other secret recording they have made - including the now-jailed activist who planned to sabotage the inauguration.

Google is operating as an unlicensed political lobbying organization.

Anonymous wrote:Jen Gennai ,Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation:


“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/24/google-exec-project-veritas-sting-says-only-big-te/


Google executive Jen Gennai responded to the video: “I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.” So she does admit saying what she said.

Congressman Louie Gohmert:  “Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped…”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And before anyone brings up 'free market', a search engine should be neutral, i.e. people enter data and they get results. When a company starts manipulating results, they have crossed the line into opinion media and should be broken up/regulated. Warren is right in this regard.

Google is operating as an un-registered lobbyist.

#BreakUpGoogle

Google has its own lobbying arm already. It's why they have a presence in DC. It's no different than the NRA or farmers when it comes to lobbying.

Also, there are a lot of bogus articles and "fake" searches that cause certain websites to appear at the top of the search engine, ie manipulating results. Google tries to remove those in their algorithm but of course, aren't always successful. This is the "resources" that the employee was also referring to. You need a pretty powerful algorithm/machine to make sure the results aren't manipulated.

I always tell my children to not believe everything they google. Adults should do the same. Google search is a great tool, but people really need to look at it with their eyes wide open.

Or, you could always use a different search engine.

I already do

Google admitted they are deliberately altering search results. She said it straight out and why. Good Lord