Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The system has never worked for everyone. I think it was designed for social conditions that don’t widely exist anymore: native English speaker w/o disabilities from a two parent household with a SAHM, non-college bound because there were lots of entry-level jobs at fair enough wages for 18 year olds with a HS diploma. If you could read a newspaper or cookbook, write thank you notes, and add and subtract enough to balance a checkbook, you were going to survive. Soft skills like being on time and a firm handshake got you a job and your boss had you trained in anything else you needed. My relatives who are late Boomers/early Gen X mostly lack 4 year degrees, but they own houses, nice cars, boats, went to Disney with the kids and take cruises or European tours. Their own kids are shut out of that. So a new education system is needed. More high-tech vocational. Graduate HS with as many CS certifications as you can get.
There is truth to this, but it's also true that some of the "soft skills" you are taking for granted, like a firm handshake and knowing how to be on time, are not necessarily things that children learn in all households. For families facing housing insecurity, circumstances can make it very difficult to show up reliably on time for their jobs, which means that their kids also don't learn these skills. And it's difficult to learn what an appropriate grip for a handshake is when you don't have any member of your family who has worked in a white collar/office setting where this kind of greeting is the norm.
I don't know the solution, since I also think that public education should be about educated children to be informed citizens of a democratic society...but I think it's important to recognize the pressures that many of our cultural and social failures to reckon with extreme income and racial disparity place on public education. It's not clear to me that public schools should be forced to teach basic hygiene, nutrition, and life skills...but in some cases that is the only stability a child has. How do you balance these disparities?
Anonymous wrote:The system has never worked for everyone. I think it was designed for social conditions that don’t widely exist anymore: native English speaker w/o disabilities from a two parent household with a SAHM, non-college bound because there were lots of entry-level jobs at fair enough wages for 18 year olds with a HS diploma. If you could read a newspaper or cookbook, write thank you notes, and add and subtract enough to balance a checkbook, you were going to survive. Soft skills like being on time and a firm handshake got you a job and your boss had you trained in anything else you needed. My relatives who are late Boomers/early Gen X mostly lack 4 year degrees, but they own houses, nice cars, boats, went to Disney with the kids and take cruises or European tours. Their own kids are shut out of that. So a new education system is needed. More high-tech vocational. Graduate HS with as many CS certifications as you can get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of your points are antithetical to the fundamental conception of public school in America which is core to our democracy. Sure it's a mess, but the alternative is entrenched class systems.
They don't have that problem in Japan or Europe.
Seriously? You think Japan and Europe don't have a class system? FYI, they do.
And, FWIW, it is much less mobile than ours.
+1. In the French case, you have a side order of racist and post-colonialist attitudes that mean the "lower tracks" are disproportionately kids/teens of African and Middle Eastern descent. The lack of opportunities for those folks led to actual riots a few years back, but I guess the "France is great" OP missed that NPR segment.
That's not a problem with tracking itself- that's a problem with implementation. The solution should be ensuring that tracking is not being implemented in a racist way. That's the same for both the US and France.
Anonymous wrote:Many of your points are antithetical to the fundamental conception of public school in America which is core to our democracy. Sure it's a mess, but the alternative is entrenched class systems.
They don't have that problem in Japan or Europe.
Seriously? You think Japan and Europe don't have a class system? FYI, they do.
And, FWIW, it is much less mobile than ours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Illegals and low income are running it. They need another support system and it should be independent of public schools. Public schools should be education not social justice and free daycare
Are you suggesting "separate but equal" schools for a sub-section of kids?
NP
I agree that schools should just be focused on education they aren't equipped to handle anything else
There should be community centers run by social workers that cover basic needs
In many cases these two systems should be collocated but they require completely different skillets and outcomes. A teacher isn't a social worker
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Illegals and low income are running it. They need another support system and it should be independent of public schools. Public schools should be education not social justice and free daycare
Are you suggesting "separate but equal" schools for a sub-section of kids?
Anonymous wrote:Illegals and low income are running it. They need another support system and it should be independent of public schools. Public schools should be education not social justice and free daycare
Anonymous wrote:Illegals and low income are running it. They need another support system and it should be independent of public schools. Public schools should be education not social justice and free daycare
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not American, and I've lived on 3 continents. I see a few reasons:
1) An obsession with all kids going to college. The idea that the average kid from Idaho should go to university is ludicrous in pretty much every country except the US. There's really no shame in it around the world the way there is in the States. Related to this, the idea that someone who isn't all that academically inclined must have a disability. In other countries, there are kids who are smarter and not so smart and it's just the way it is. Parents can accept that their kids can have different abilities to others.
2) A ton of special needs. Not sure what the US is doing that every second kid has ADHD or Autism or some type of developmental disorder these days, but it's just not what I see in other countries.
3) An obsession with least restrictive environment for those with disabilities. In other countries, you either keep up with the mainstream classes (with MINIMAL support, like maybe a dyslexia pullout) assuming a bit of differentiation (most of the time there would be core activities and advanced activities in any class) or you don't.
4) Way too lenient about behavioral issues. Not sure whether this is related to point 1 or 2 or 3 or some combination, but seems like every classroom in the US has some kid or kids with behavioral issues and that's really more the exception than the norm elsewhere. Teachers elsewhere can actually teach.
5) A ton of social problems. This is a can of worms so I don't even want to open it, but let's just say that this country has a lot of problems and they spill over into the schools.
6) Very limited illegal immigration elsewhere, and all migrants are expected to go to a special school to learn the language before being mainstreamed. No such thing as the teacher getting a bunch of surprise kids in 4th grade who can't keep up with grade level and have no idea how to speak the language.
7) TRACKING. This is a big one. Related to point 1 and 3, I guess. In other countries there is tracking and it's accepted as being the best for everyone overall. Sometimes exceptions can be made if a kid has particular passion but just missed the cutoff (whether that's up or down)... but that isn't related to how much the parents themselves push.
8) Teaching is a more respected profession. Higher requirements and also higher pay and expectations lead to higher results for kids and respect for teachers. Oh and parents generally stay out of it.
9) Greater respect for school property. A small thing, all things considered, but elsewhere I've noticed that school property (whether that's buildings, furniture, books and electronics and materials) seem to be cared for a bit better than I see here. I guess the cost of all of the damage and extra wear and tear adds up.
There are probably others, but they're the things I see off the top of my head.
American here but this seems accurate.
Another American and I agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of your points are antithetical to the fundamental conception of public school in America which is core to our democracy. Sure it's a mess, but the alternative is entrenched class systems.
They don't have that problem in Japan or Europe.
Seriously? You think Japan and Europe don't have a class system? FYI, they do.
And, FWIW, it is much less mobile than ours.
+1. In the French case, you have a side order of racist and post-colonialist attitudes that mean the "lower tracks" are disproportionately kids/teens of African and Middle Eastern descent. The lack of opportunities for those folks led to actual riots a few years back, but I guess the "France is great" OP missed that NPR segment.
Anonymous wrote:Many of your points are antithetical to the fundamental conception of public school in America which is core to our democracy. Sure it's a mess, but the alternative is entrenched class systems.
They don't have that problem in Japan or Europe.
Seriously? You think Japan and Europe don't have a class system? FYI, they do.
And, FWIW, it is much less mobile than ours.