Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gee thanks OP. My son needs a 504 because of type I diabetes. When his blood sugar has him higher than you and me chugging 5 full sugar cokes or about to go in a coma - he needs the time to be able to take care of his medical condition before resuming test taking.
The OP pointed to a New York Times analysis showing that overall, 504s give a score advantage to kids of every race on tests. Are you arguing that their analysis is wrong, or that their analysis never should have been done? Because this is an article about trends and averages, not about your kid. The fact that your kid has diabetes has absolutely nothing to do with whether affluent parents are abusing 504s. You would think that you would not want people to abuse 504s, so they are still available to people like your son who need them.
Anonymous wrote:Gee thanks OP. My son needs a 504 because of type I diabetes. When his blood sugar has him higher than you and me chugging 5 full sugar cokes or about to go in a coma - he needs the time to be able to take care of his medical condition before resuming test taking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another thing to think about OP is that kids who get 504 are often highly gifted, with some learning challenges. For example a lot of kids with high verbal or performance IQs have slow processing speed as measured by neuropsych tests. So the ones who qualify for 504 are generally high functioning students who may have certain strengths but may need accommodations to level the playing field vis a vis their challenges, with the main accommodations being extended time. Hence the term twice exceptional (2E). Kids who are exceptional in terms of ability without any special challenges will do very well on the tests regardless.
But isn't processing speed a part of the test? Don't the schools have a right to know that the playing field was "leveled?" Why wouldn't you tell the school that the kid got extra time? Then, the answer is, "the kid is super smart, but needed more time." That is an accurate representation of reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gee thanks OP. My son needs a 504 because of type I diabetes. When his blood sugar has him higher than you and me chugging 5 full sugar cokes or about to go in a coma - he needs the time to be able to take care of his medical condition before resuming test taking.
What your kid need is not extra time but breaks in between. Not extra time to do the tests but breaks to monitor sugar level and take care of his medical condition. I know of diabetics who got extra time to do the tests and worked to their advantage.
Anonymous wrote:Gee thanks OP. My son needs a 504 because of type I diabetes. When his blood sugar has him higher than you and me chugging 5 full sugar cokes or about to go in a coma - he needs the time to be able to take care of his medical condition before resuming test taking.
Anonymous wrote:what if the disproportionate number of white kids getting accommodations is actually the effect of racism in a completely different way?
To explain:
There's a kind of rule of thumb that 10% of students qualify for IEPs. Long time since I have seen a breakdown, but a (smallish) portion of that is kids with cognitive disabilities ("mental retardation" in IDEA). (that proportion related to the percentage of kids it is expected will take alternate testing when assessing schools' performance).
Some proportion of these IEP kids are going to want to go to college and will take SATs/ACTs. I have no idea what % of kids with disabilities require extended time on tests, but given the potential rage of disablities--not just processing, there's also kids with tics, there's kids with ADHD, there's kids with physical disabilities--I can see where quite a few would need that.
But here's another thing about IDEA--classification. It has long been noted that white kids are more likely to be classified LD or autistic or OHI with the same presentation as kids of color who are classified ED or MR. And I will bet anything that the kids classified ED or MR are going to be less likely to be steered towards college than kids in those other categories.
In other words, the 2.8% of white test takers getting extended time compared to 1.5% overall COULD be a result of other systemic holding back of kids of color (this is not even getting into different SES stats, worse health stats, and whatever else)--as opposed to white having a chance to game the system their own way.
I have NO problem with kids who need accommodations getting them through the post-secondary application and, yes, educational process. Is life different when you're looking at employment? Depending on the specific job, maybe or maybe not. Regardless, disability should not prevent someone from getting the knowledge, regardless of what they do afterwards.
Anyway, nobody gave me EXTRA SAT points for finishing my tests in a third of the time it took other people and having to endure sitting in the testing room with NOTHING to do, no paper to draw on, no book to read.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worked with kids for years. Have seen LD kids think circles around speed demon straight A students. You know, some kids are athletic, some kids crunch numbers fast, some debate on their feet, some innovate, some are leaders, some contemplate at depths you’ll never know. No one’s entitled to anything; some people are just lucky they start with more advantages. A tiny little subset of scores does not necessarily make you a better thinker than someone with an incrementally different set of scores. Yes, some people are “smarter” than others, but you will not necessarily know it by their tests scores. Sure, you can glean some info on whether they appear to be prepared for basic college level work. If you want to tell colleges who to admit, get a job in an admissions office. All this griping suggests there’s only one kind of human who deserves everything. Be glad everyone doesn’t think this way or you wouldn’t be reading your bloody smart device and sitting in air conditioning with the lunch of your choice right now. You have no idea what other people have figured out that you benefit from every minute of the day. And if they were just like all these entitled complainers, we’d be without.
(The merits of which are a different conversation
I agree with everything you say. This isn't inconsistent with the idea that the College Board should just report the test scores of all students (taken under the same time constraints), and let the colleges decide if they matter or not.