Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you want balanced out teams then go to rec soccer. But to whine about kids being challenged against a superior opponent is laughable.
So why are there divisions and flights and a and b and c teams, etc.? Why even have teams? Why have DA and ECNL? Why even have tryouts and rosters? Just let the best players and only the best players play every game in every league and every tournament. Screw the less talented players. They suck anyhow according to you, right?
You seem to think sports are designed for fairness
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you want balanced out teams then go to rec soccer. But to whine about kids being challenged against a superior opponent is laughable.
So why are there divisions and flights and a and b and c teams, etc.? Why even have teams? Why have DA and ECNL? Why even have tryouts and rosters? Just let the best players and only the best players play every game in every league and every tournament. Screw the less talented players. They suck anyhow according to you, right?
The point went way over your head. It’s a one off game. Your players do get a benefit of having the challenge of playing against higher caliber individuals, whether the result upsets you or not. Our club is not one of the big ones by any stretch of the imagination, and pretty much every single game opponents bring guest players, usually from their “higher ranked/league teams” and guess what? Adversity builds better players, regardless of level. You gotta adjust, maybe you lose but maybe it makes your own players step up their game. As for the team using them and why they play so much, having a player that can provide a solid base (ie. CDM) can allow for the others to play with more freedom and have some success. Ultimately you are getting bent out of shape over youth soccer. Your kid will live and there will be another play, another game, another season. If this is such a huge deal to you then take a step back, take it as a compliment or something. They needed guests to win a game for them; don’t be petty and roll with the punches. That’s life and that’s futbol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you want balanced out teams then go to rec soccer. But to whine about kids being challenged against a superior opponent is laughable.
So why are there divisions and flights and a and b and c teams, etc.? Why even have teams? Why have DA and ECNL? Why even have tryouts and rosters? Just let the best players and only the best players play every game in every league and every tournament. Screw the less talented players. They suck anyhow according to you, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you want balanced out teams then go to rec soccer. But to whine about kids being challenged against a superior opponent is laughable.
So why are there divisions and flights and a and b and c teams, etc.? Why even have teams? Why have DA and ECNL? Why even have tryouts and rosters? Just let the best players and only the best players play every game in every league and every tournament. Screw the less talented players. They suck anyhow according to you, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you want balanced out teams then go to rec soccer. But to whine about kids being challenged against a superior opponent is laughable.
So why are there divisions and flights and a and b and c teams, etc.? Why even have teams? Why have DA and ECNL? Why even have tryouts and rosters? Just let the best players and only the best players play every game in every league and every tournament. Screw the less talented players. They suck anyhow according to you, right?
Anonymous wrote:
If you want balanced out teams then go to rec soccer. But to whine about kids being challenged against a superior opponent is laughable.
Anonymous wrote:OP, ignore the troll you have a valid point. If a league has been broken into divisions or a tournament into brackets based on competitive level, clearly that has been done for a reason. Bringing down multiple players from a higher level and playing them extensively is not the decent, sporting thing to do. But as you probably are seeing and the troll is reinforcing, there is a lot of indecency in youth sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing in 2 guest players when there is only one sub is ok - what if one player didn't show up or got hurt. However, guest players in this situation should be used as subs, not starters. Parents of players on the team should have a problem with guests getting more playing time than the regular players, especially at U-littles unless the players lost playing for a reason communicated by coach (not showing up at practice, goofing off, etc.).
And how do you expect the parents of the 2 guest players to feel about that?
They are giving up their time - possibly other playing/training opportunities - to help out a lower team in their club. It's also probable these kids were taken off the bottom end of the top team's roster - meaning they usually are subs. So now they're supposed to guest for the bottom team and still sit on the bench, even though they are the two best players there? They may be better, but they are kids too right? Shouldn't they be treated fairly?
I agree they shouldn't have played the whole game, but they absolutely should have started and played the majority of the game - assuming their attitude, effort and performance merited it. The teaching point for those players in a game like that should be something like, "The best players are the ones who can make their teammates around them better." As long as they are doing that, showing good positive leadership, and not playing selfishly, they should be on the field.
Anonymous wrote:OP, if you are complaining about guest players on the opposing team you need to STFU right now about it.
Super classy. I'll be sure to take the advice of a refined individual such as yourself, thanks a lot.
OP, if you are complaining about guest players on the opposing team you need to STFU right now about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing in 2 guest players when there is only one sub is ok - what if one player didn't show up or got hurt. However, guest players in this situation should be used as subs, not starters. Parents of players on the team should have a problem with guests getting more playing time than the regular players, especially at U-littles unless the players lost playing for a reason communicated by coach (not showing up at practice, goofing off, etc.).
And how do you expect the parents of the 2 guest players to feel about that?
They are giving up their time - possibly other playing/training opportunities - to help out a lower team in their club. It's also probable these kids were taken off the bottom end of the top team's roster - meaning they usually are subs. So now they're supposed to guest for the bottom team and still sit on the bench, even though they are the two best players there? They may be better, but they are kids too right? Shouldn't they be treated fairly?
I agree they shouldn't have played the whole game, but they absolutely should have started and played the majority of the game - assuming their attitude, effort and performance merited it. The teaching point for those players in a game like that should be something like, "The best players are the ones who can make their teammates around them better." As long as they are doing that, showing good positive leadership, and not playing selfishly, they should be on the field.