Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NP with a very difficult baby who is now a difficult baby-toddler. I SAH. There have been a number of days over the past 17 months DH has come home and I have said if this child was watched by anyone other than me, his mother, he would have been left in a corner to cry while the caretaker checked out completely because he was just SO difficult. ALL DAY LONG. I used to work, there were days I used to phone it in. I can see how an easy-ish baby might fare the same in any childcare situation, but my child would definitely have gotten some phoned-in care very regularly if he was with a nanny or daycare. On those days I would remind myself that I am his mother, I can't phone it in, and I would regroup and find the energy to try to deal with whatever firestorm was currently happening. I can't imagine someone just doing a job would be able to do the same.
Another NP. I totally agree. I have two kids and both of them are very different personalities. They would not have been the happiest in daycare situation just because they are not good about following the schedule of the daycare.
Please. So many parents think they have a uniquely difficult child. Babies cry. Babies want to be held. You should fire your nanny if they leave your child to cry in a corrner.
Spoken like someone with an easy kid! Count your blessings, lady.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Little children need stability, competence and love.
It’s worth the sacrifice to give your own children what they *need*.
Little children can also get stability, competence, and love from a quality daycare provider or nanny. That can't be the only reason a parent decides to SAH.
-- signed, a SAHM
Perhaps they “can”, but we all know the reality....
Let’s be honest here.
Providing your children what they need - is a major reason why many families make the sacrifice to live on one income.
I would have said this before having kids. I grew up with a SAHM who was very against women working when they have kids. She made it very clear that women who work are choosing money over giving their kids love and that staying home is always better.
Now that I’ve had children and have experienced watching nannies with kids, sending a kid to daycare, raising my own kids, etc, I’m not convinced that one way is better than the other. There are bad nannies and there are bad moms. There are pros and cons to each arrangement. If you stay home it should be for you. Unfortunately, you may be in for a disappointment later if you really think staying home was some tremendous benefit to your child. I mean go and watch kids at a decent daycare (if you were allowed to do so). You’d be shocked how happy they look. They don’t look any happier or unhappeir than kids at the playground with SAHMs.
All studies also support this.
Ladies, stay home for yourselves if you must, but stop pretending it's benefiting your kids.
Ehh. Not all situations are equal. Lots of childcare providers are excellent, but many are not. If you have the choice to work or not and the choice of provider, your kids will likely be fine. We should concern ourselves with those of us who have few choices and childcare situations that are far from ideal. Because those situations are plentiful.
Agree.
Most people hired to do childcare are not the good at all.
that, not the
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My biggest surprise is that I really don't feel any of the terrible things described on DCUM (or other places for that matter).
I'm not bored. I'm not lonely. I do not desperately miss adult-only interaction (although, I stay active with other parents). I get plenty of intellectual stimulation from listening to podcasts while doing chores or driving, and I'm more up-to-date on politics than my DH (who really SHOULD know more, for his job). I have plenty of hobbies. I alternate doing things the kids want (ie, sitting and playing), with outings (story time or playground or playdate) and my own interests (cooking, photography, fitness).
Literally the only reason I wish I were still working was so that I had more of an identity at adult-only parties, especially when talking to people who don't have kids. But, that alone would be a silly reason to stick my kids with a nanny and head back to work!
THIS!!
I am astounded by the assumptions people make about my " intellect" because I am a SAHM. I have two masters and tons of certifications in my field and I keep taking online courses and courses in the community college because I love learning. People then wonder why do I need to take more classes if I am not going back to work!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Little children need stability, competence and love.
It’s worth the sacrifice to give your own children what they *need*.
Little children can also get stability, competence, and love from a quality daycare provider or nanny. That can't be the only reason a parent decides to SAH.
-- signed, a SAHM
Perhaps they “can”, but we all know the reality....
Let’s be honest here.
Providing your children what they need - is a major reason why many families make the sacrifice to live on one income.
I would have said this before having kids. I grew up with a SAHM who was very against women working when they have kids. She made it very clear that women who work are choosing money over giving their kids love and that staying home is always better.
Now that I’ve had children and have experienced watching nannies with kids, sending a kid to daycare, raising my own kids, etc, I’m not convinced that one way is better than the other. There are bad nannies and there are bad moms. There are pros and cons to each arrangement. If you stay home it should be for you. Unfortunately, you may be in for a disappointment later if you really think staying home was some tremendous benefit to your child. I mean go and watch kids at a decent daycare (if you were allowed to do so). You’d be shocked how happy they look. They don’t look any happier or unhappeir than kids at the playground with SAHMs.
All studies also support this.
Ladies, stay home for yourselves if you must, but stop pretending it's benefiting your kids.
Ehh. Not all situations are equal. Lots of childcare providers are excellent, but many are not. If you have the choice to work or not and the choice of provider, your kids will likely be fine. We should concern ourselves with those of us who have few choices and childcare situations that are far from ideal. Because those situations are plentiful.
Agree.
Most people hired to do childcare are not the good at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Little children need stability, competence and love.
It’s worth the sacrifice to give your own children what they *need*.
Little children can also get stability, competence, and love from a quality daycare provider or nanny. That can't be the only reason a parent decides to SAH.
-- signed, a SAHM
Perhaps they “can”, but we all know the reality....
Let’s be honest here.
Providing your children what they need - is a major reason why many families make the sacrifice to live on one income.
I would have said this before having kids. I grew up with a SAHM who was very against women working when they have kids. She made it very clear that women who work are choosing money over giving their kids love and that staying home is always better.
Now that I’ve had children and have experienced watching nannies with kids, sending a kid to daycare, raising my own kids, etc, I’m not convinced that one way is better than the other. There are bad nannies and there are bad moms. There are pros and cons to each arrangement. If you stay home it should be for you. Unfortunately, you may be in for a disappointment later if you really think staying home was some tremendous benefit to your child. I mean go and watch kids at a decent daycare (if you were allowed to do so). You’d be shocked how happy they look. They don’t look any happier or unhappeir than kids at the playground with SAHMs.
All studies also support this.
Ladies, stay home for yourselves if you must, but stop pretending it's benefiting your kids.
Ehh. Not all situations are equal. Lots of childcare providers are excellent, but many are not. If you have the choice to work or not and the choice of provider, your kids will likely be fine. We should concern ourselves with those of us who have few choices and childcare situations that are far from ideal. Because those situations are plentiful.
Anonymous wrote:Pp again. I think it depends on your personality. I’m very social and have always made play dates and mom friends. I did this when I was working and now that I’m home full time. I have both SAHM and working mom friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NP with a very difficult baby who is now a difficult baby-toddler. I SAH. There have been a number of days over the past 17 months DH has come home and I have said if this child was watched by anyone other than me, his mother, he would have been left in a corner to cry while the caretaker checked out completely because he was just SO difficult. ALL DAY LONG. I used to work, there were days I used to phone it in. I can see how an easy-ish baby might fare the same in any childcare situation, but my child would definitely have gotten some phoned-in care very regularly if he was with a nanny or daycare. On those days I would remind myself that I am his mother, I can't phone it in, and I would regroup and find the energy to try to deal with whatever firestorm was currently happening. I can't imagine someone just doing a job would be able to do the same.
Another NP. I totally agree. I have two kids and both of them are very different personalities. They would not have been the happiest in daycare situation just because they are not good about following the schedule of the daycare.
Please. So many parents think they have a uniquely difficult child. Babies cry. Babies want to be held. You should fire your nanny if they leave your child to cry in a corrner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NP with a very difficult baby who is now a difficult baby-toddler. I SAH. There have been a number of days over the past 17 months DH has come home and I have said if this child was watched by anyone other than me, his mother, he would have been left in a corner to cry while the caretaker checked out completely because he was just SO difficult. ALL DAY LONG. I used to work, there were days I used to phone it in. I can see how an easy-ish baby might fare the same in any childcare situation, but my child would definitely have gotten some phoned-in care very regularly if he was with a nanny or daycare. On those days I would remind myself that I am his mother, I can't phone it in, and I would regroup and find the energy to try to deal with whatever firestorm was currently happening. I can't imagine someone just doing a job would be able to do the same.
Another NP. I totally agree. I have two kids and both of them are very different personalities. They would not have been the happiest in daycare situation just because they are not good about following the schedule of the daycare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Little children need stability, competence and love.
It’s worth the sacrifice to give your own children what they *need*.
Little children can also get stability, competence, and love from a quality daycare provider or nanny. That can't be the only reason a parent decides to SAH.
-- signed, a SAHM
Perhaps they “can”, but we all know the reality....
Let’s be honest here.
Providing your children what they need - is a major reason why many families make the sacrifice to live on one income.
I would have said this before having kids. I grew up with a SAHM who was very against women working when they have kids. She made it very clear that women who work are choosing money over giving their kids love and that staying home is always better.
Now that I’ve had children and have experienced watching nannies with kids, sending a kid to daycare, raising my own kids, etc, I’m not convinced that one way is better than the other. There are bad nannies and there are bad moms. There are pros and cons to each arrangement. If you stay home it should be for you. Unfortunately, you may be in for a disappointment later if you really think staying home was some tremendous benefit to your child. I mean go and watch kids at a decent daycare (if you were allowed to do so). You’d be shocked how happy they look. They don’t look any happier or unhappeir than kids at the playground with SAHMs.
All studies also support this.
Ladies, stay home for yourselves if you must, but stop pretending it's benefiting your kids.