Anonymous wrote:This is the kind of situation that really pisses me off. As the parent of a child with special needs, it bothers me to no end when I hear stories like this about other parents with SN children basically antagonizing the school and administration. It's the child who suffered here. If the parent was indeed a few min away waiting for a repair man (really?) it doesn't take a few minutes to drive and get your kid and bring them home. Sounds to me like a parent trying to prove a point and test the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the people that feel that it was escalation to call the mom, and then call the police, when kid was "just staying on the playground and safe"
The only way to insure the safety would be for one staff person to remain outside with that student.
Unless that kid has a 1-1 aide, that is not something that can happen. Staff have other assignments.
If, as others have suggested, this is building toward an argument that the kid needs a 1-1 aide, then this is the process that has to happen.
I work in special ed, and yes, it can. If the kid won't come in, somebody has to stay outside with him. We've had this happen before. People take shifts--the principal, the program coordinator, related service providers, whoever. Is other stuff not getting done? Yup, but that's too bad. Until you manage to get critical staffing in place or a placement change (the argument for either of which would be supported by a record of such incidents), that's what you have to do. You don't call the parents. And you certainly don't call the police unless there's some kind of weapon involved. Not leaving the playground? Come on.
Yep. I've had more than one meeting with the school social worker cancelled because she was attending to a child in crisis. I wish the school had more staff, but I would certainly never want them to call the police just so they can keep my meeting on time!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the people that feel that it was escalation to call the mom, and then call the police, when kid was "just staying on the playground and safe"
The only way to insure the safety would be for one staff person to remain outside with that student.
Unless that kid has a 1-1 aide, that is not something that can happen. Staff have other assignments.
If, as others have suggested, this is building toward an argument that the kid needs a 1-1 aide, then this is the process that has to happen.
I work in special ed, and yes, it can. If the kid won't come in, somebody has to stay outside with him. We've had this happen before. People take shifts--the principal, the program coordinator, related service providers, whoever. Is other stuff not getting done? Yup, but that's too bad. Until you manage to get critical staffing in place or a placement change (the argument for either of which would be supported by a record of such incidents), that's what you have to do. You don't call the parents. And you certainly don't call the police unless there's some kind of weapon involved. Not leaving the playground? Come on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP is long gone, I suspect and probably hasn't learned anything from this thread on improving the school to meet the needs. I don't think she expected these responses.
Right?
I worry this is my neighborhood school, where many children are underserved and going to pieces. You have no idea what a child and family -- and school! -- are going through, unless you are on the IEP team. The police called on a 2nd-3rd grader? OMG. That poor child. This thread makes me so ill.
Anonymous wrote:OP is long gone, I suspect and probably hasn't learned anything from this thread on improving the school to meet the needs. I don't think she expected these responses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the people that feel that it was escalation to call the mom, and then call the police, when kid was "just staying on the playground and safe"
The only way to insure the safety would be for one staff person to remain outside with that student.
Unless that kid has a 1-1 aide, that is not something that can happen. Staff have other assignments.
If, as others have suggested, this is building toward an argument that the kid needs a 1-1 aide, then this is the process that has to happen.
I work in special ed, and yes, it can. If the kid won't come in, somebody has to stay outside with him. We've had this happen before. People take shifts--the principal, the program coordinator, related service providers, whoever. Is other stuff not getting done? Yup, but that's too bad. Until you manage to get critical staffing in place or a placement change (the argument for either of which would be supported by a record of such incidents), that's what you have to do. You don't call the parents. And you certainly don't call the police unless there's some kind of weapon involved. Not leaving the playground? Come on.
Anonymous wrote:For the people that feel that it was escalation to call the mom, and then call the police, when kid was "just staying on the playground and safe"
The only way to insure the safety would be for one staff person to remain outside with that student.
Unless that kid has a 1-1 aide, that is not something that can happen. Staff have other assignments.
If, as others have suggested, this is building toward an argument that the kid needs a 1-1 aide, then this is the process that has to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I am fully on the side of the parent here, I'm annoyed by the theme that this school might not be the right placement.
Why can't the goal be for the base school to step up to the plate and educate the children assigned to go there? Find a solution, don't just say you can't do it. Instead, school districts prefer to ship kids half way across the county, to schools or centers where they can be quarantined down at the end of dark hallways in closet size classrooms. In classes where they won't receive the same education as their "peers" (term used lightly, since they don't really have the opportunity to have any peers or friends, because they spend 90% of their day in self-contained and live so far away from any of the gen ed kids in the school). Falling further behind educationally and socially every year.
Yes, I know the answer is money. Nobody wants to pay to have resources in place where they are needed. But when it is your child who is suffering due to being forced into an alternative placement because the base school doesn't want to deal, that's not a satisfactory answer.
That could happen, but there's also a chance that the kid will end up in a good private placement with better staff who are better equipped to help the kid involved. The fact that OP's school couldn't deal with this relatively simple situation without calling the police is concerning.
Anonymous wrote:While I am fully on the side of the parent here, I'm annoyed by the theme that this school might not be the right placement.
Why can't the goal be for the base school to step up to the plate and educate the children assigned to go there? Find a solution, don't just say you can't do it. Instead, school districts prefer to ship kids half way across the county, to schools or centers where they can be quarantined down at the end of dark hallways in closet size classrooms. In classes where they won't receive the same education as their "peers" (term used lightly, since they don't really have the opportunity to have any peers or friends, because they spend 90% of their day in self-contained and live so far away from any of the gen ed kids in the school). Falling further behind educationally and socially every year.
Yes, I know the answer is money. Nobody wants to pay to have resources in place where they are needed. But when it is your child who is suffering due to being forced into an alternative placement because the base school doesn't want to deal, that's not a satisfactory answer.