Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between Bush 43, Obama, and Trump, it is a wonder this country has not had a civil war. Each is so corrupt, it's like the Wiemar Republic.

Obama has zero indictments or convictions in his 8 years in office. Neither of the Bush's nor Trump can claim the same, and for Trump it has been just over 2 years.

We'll see what transpires over the coming months. That claim may not stand.
And, let's not forget that Gregory Craig, ex-Obama legal counsel was recently indicted. For lying about what he did in 2012. So, there's that.

Are you deliberately lying or do you actually think that?

Lol.

He was indicted for lies related to work he did for Manafort in Ukraine.

What exactly did I say that is a lie?

Craig is charged with lying during an Oct. 19, 2017, interview with the special counsel’s office about the nature of work he did for the Ukrainian government in 2012 and 2013, while he was a senior partner at the law firm Skadden Arps. Craig left the firm in April of 2018.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/11/obama-white-house-counsel-gregory-craig-charged-by-federal-prosecutors.html

Note from Steel's meeting with the FBI in October 2016

https://www.scribd.com/document/409446360/CU-FOIA-Document-Release-Kavalec-Memo-Related-Records

I really don't understand how this helps Trump's cause. Pretty damning stuff in there, some provides more detail than before, some is new.

Where is the "trump Russia collusion", PP?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"He has evidently been investigating aspects of the Russia investigation for a while. This new emphasis broadens his role. Hopefully, he won't take 2 years"

I'm sure Barr is aware Americans have no stomach for another 2 year multi million dollar race down a rabbit hole.

Like Bengazi?

Please don’t compare a tragic event where four Americans lost their lives to a rabbit hole.

This. Somehow, I don't remember a special counsel spending two years--or two seconds--investigating Benghazi. Mueller had millions of documents from Trump. HRC emails for an investigation? Not so much. They "disappeared."

There were ten different investigations of the attacks in Benghazi: six by Republican-controlled House committees - Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Intelligence, Judiciary, and Oversight, as well as the House Select Committee; one by the FBI; one by the Senate Intelligence Committee; one by the Senate Homeland Security Committee; and one by the State Department Accountability Review Board. The House Select Committee didn’t release its report until June 2016, so longer than two years.

Between the Benghazi investigations and the email investigations, Republicans spent over $80 million in taxpayer dollars plus years and years and didn't come up with even one single prosecutable offense or indictment out of all of it, as compared to Mueller who found dozens and dozens of criminal counts, 34 criminal indictments of individuals, 3 criminal indictments of companies, and over a dozen more criminal referrals to outside prosecutors. Plus, Mueller's investigation more than paid for itself with over $40 million in seized assets agreed to forfeiture in Manafort in his plea deal.

Anonymous wrote:Durham was named special prosecutor by Janet Reno after discovering Whitey Bulger corrupted FBI Agents. Four men were convicted of a murder they didnt commit that FBI Director Mueller knew, but didnt do anything. After two of the men died in prison and Durham found the truth, the tax payers settled a $101.7 million lawsuit with the families.

Dont get me started on the Mueller Anthrax investigation in which the wrong man was a person of interest.

When did all of this happen?

Anonymous wrote:It was Papadopoulos. In the bar. With the Australian operative.

Mystery solved. Can I collect the $10M?

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that include looking into the shady dealings of the Trump campaign with malignant foreign agents? Careful what you wish for!

Malignant foreign agents like Hillary Clinton? Unsecured server used to process and store highly classified intelligence, uranium one, and going to the Russians for dirt on trump? Malignant foreign agents like that?

Yeah, being a dumb SecState isn't a crime. Fortunate for both Clinton and Pompeo.

Dumb no; not securing classified information yes. Enter coney and the crickets.

Nah. State is/used to be pretty casual with classified information. She didn't start it.

Doesn’t matter. It’s criminal activity whether everyone is doing it or not.

Nope. Sorry, you don't get to define criminal activity. That's not how our laws work.

Disagree all you want, it doesn’t matter. Criminal activity is criminal activity. Sorry.

Okay...

But you are mistaken in your understanding. And if the only contribution you have to a thread about Durham is But her emails!, then go ahead without me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that include looking into the shady dealings of the Trump campaign with malignant foreign agents? Careful what you wish for!

Malignant foreign agents like Hillary Clinton? Unsecured server used to process and store highly classified intelligence, uranium one, and going to the Russians for dirt on trump? Malignant foreign agents like that?

Yeah, being a dumb SecState isn't a crime. Fortunate for both Clinton and Pompeo.

Dumb no; not securing classified information yes. Enter coney and the crickets.

Nah. State is/used to be pretty casual with classified information. She didn't start it.

Doesn’t matter. It’s criminal activity whether everyone is doing it or not.

Nope. Sorry, you don't get to define criminal activity. That's not how our laws work.

Disagree all you want, it doesn’t matter. Criminal activity is criminal activity. Sorry.

Anonymous wrote:Karma. Lol.

+1 You beat me to it. (I'm smirking rn)

Durham was named special prosecutor by Janet Reno after discovering Whitey Bulger corrupted FBI Agents. Four men were convicted of a murder they didnt commit that FBI Director Mueller knew, but didnt do anything. After two of the men died in prison and Durham found the truth, the tax payers settled a $101.7 million lawsuit with the families.

Dont get me started on the Mueller Anthrax investigation in which the wrong man was a person of interest.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that include looking into the shady dealings of the Trump campaign with malignant foreign agents? Careful what you wish for!

Malignant foreign agents like Hillary Clinton? Unsecured server used to process and store highly classified intelligence, uranium one, and going to the Russians for dirt on trump? Malignant foreign agents like that?

Yeah, being a dumb SecState isn't a crime. Fortunate for both Clinton and Pompeo.

Dumb no; not securing classified information yes. Enter coney and the crickets.

Nah. State is/used to be pretty casual with classified information. She didn't start it.

Doesn’t matter. It’s criminal activity whether everyone is doing it or not.

Nope. Sorry, you don't get to define criminal activity. That's not how our laws work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that include looking into the shady dealings of the Trump campaign with malignant foreign agents? Careful what you wish for!

Malignant foreign agents like Hillary Clinton? Unsecured server used to process and store highly classified intelligence, uranium one, and going to the Russians for dirt on trump? Malignant foreign agents like that?

Yeah, being a dumb SecState isn't a crime. Fortunate for both Clinton and Pompeo.

Dumb no; not securing classified information yes. Enter coney and the crickets.

Nah. State is/used to be pretty casual with classified information. She didn't start it.

Doesn’t matter. It’s criminal activity whether everyone is doing it or not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that include looking into the shady dealings of the Trump campaign with malignant foreign agents? Careful what you wish for!

Malignant foreign agents like Hillary Clinton? Unsecured server used to process and store highly classified intelligence, uranium one, and going to the Russians for dirt on trump? Malignant foreign agents like that?

Yeah, being a dumb SecState isn't a crime. Fortunate for both Clinton and Pompeo.

Dumb no; not securing classified information yes. Enter coney and the crickets.

Nah. State is/used to be pretty casual with classified information. She didn't start it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does that include looking into the shady dealings of the Trump campaign with malignant foreign agents? Careful what you wish for!

Malignant foreign agents like Hillary Clinton? Unsecured server used to process and store highly classified intelligence, uranium one, and going to the Russians for dirt on trump? Malignant foreign agents like that?

Yeah, being a dumb SecState isn't a crime. Fortunate for both Clinton and Pompeo.

Dumb no; not securing classified information yes. Enter coney and the crickets.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between Bush 43, Obama, and Trump, it is a wonder this country has not had a civil war. Each is so corrupt, it's like the Wiemar Republic.

Obama has zero indictments or convictions in his 8 years in office. Neither of the Bush's nor Trump can claim the same, and for Trump it has been just over 2 years.

We'll see what transpires over the coming months. That claim may not stand.
And, let's not forget that Gregory Craig, ex-Obama legal counsel was recently indicted. For lying about what he did in 2012. So, there's that.

Are you deliberately lying or do you actually think that?

Lol.

He was indicted for lies related to work he did for Manafort in Ukraine.