Anonymous wrote:Again, let's stipulate that her tweet (for which she has apologized) was unnecessary and thoughtless. Let's even go further and say that her tweet reeked of racial and class entitlement.
Stipulate all that. But: Why has her book contract been cancelled?
In exactly what way is social justice enhanced by preventing her novel from being published?
That's the kind of sick sh*t that happens in totalitarian societies. Twitter mobs go after you; your friends and colleagues instantly desert you and condemn you; you become a non-person.
This does not advance racial justice. It just adds another injustice on top of the first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No, I do not think anyone should eat on the underground public transport in a city full of rats.
This author was not in the wrong in calling an employee out.
I do not know the reason for the publication cancellation, but if the tweet is really the reason, then it's deplorable. And really weird.
The author is in the wrong because she was a COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL. How can that be your job and you don't know when to keep your mouth shut?
Just like Justine Sacco and her AIDs tweet.
![]()
https://www.vox.com/2018/1/19/16911074/justine-sacco-iac-match-group-return-tweet
Does a communications professional hamper you from calling out people who do wrong in their professional capacity? Metro employees should model good behavior on Metro. Seems like a no-brainer, and anyone who sees them do otherwise can absolutely call them out on social media.
I really don't understand why you don't get this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel with my 3yo by metro every day and feel guilty about discreetly feeding him snacks, but now plan to just do it in the open. The rules are over.
Great example for your kid![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was just telling my husband about this tonight. While I am a POC and consider myself to be incredibly liberal, I just can't with all this. The WMATA employee was clearly in the wrong.
Photography is not allowed on trains - so the author was also wrong.
Anonymous wrote:I was just telling my husband about this tonight. While I am a POC and consider myself to be incredibly liberal, I just can't with all this. The WMATA employee was clearly in the wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel with my 3yo by metro every day and feel guilty about discreetly feeding him snacks, but now plan to just do it in the open. The rules are over.
Great example for your kid![]()
Anonymous wrote:I travel with my 3yo by metro every day and feel guilty about discreetly feeding him snacks, but now plan to just do it in the open. The rules are over.
Anonymous wrote:So - a DC woman tweeted out a photo of a uniformed metro employee eating on the Metro, noting that Metro prohibits eating on the metro, and complaining about a metro employee violating the same rule metro employees ask riders to respect. The tweeter is Arab American and the metro employee she complained about is a black woman. Now her publisher and book distributor are cancelling her novel's publication as a result. (See Post article below: https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2019/05/11/dc-pundit-shamed-metro-worker-eating-train-now-her-book-deal-is-jeopardy/?utm_term=.804898e5dbb8).
So, I agree her tweet was unnecessary and thoughtless: metro employees are low wage workers who get very short breaks, and this poor metro employee could now get fired.
But a) Metro does enforce its no eating policy, often in absurd and horrible ways, often against people of color, so is it really inherently horrendous for the tweeting author to highlight that this is a bit hypocritical? (see: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/metro-transit-police-arrest-teenager-for-carrying-chips-and-lollipop-into-station/2016/10/19/1360a014-9627-11e6-bb29-bf2701dbe0a3_story.html?utm_term=.fe6adc99091b)
And b) If she had instead posted a photo of a uniformed DC cop breaking a law that other people go to jail for breaking (maybe having an open container of alcohol, or peeing in an alley), would everyone be calling her a racist if the cop in her photo was African America - as opposed to thanking her for highlighting police hypocrisy?
And c) Her book was cancelled, WTF? Even if you think her tweet was completely thoughtless, should this really lead to her book being nixed?
I consider myself very much on the left and I think both commuters and metro employees should be able to eat on the metro without fear of arrest or discipline, and I also think low wage workers get a shitty deal, and low wage African American female workers get a particularly shitty deal. But I also think it's frightening that this tweeter's NOVEL has been cancelled because of a tweet that was, at worst, thoughtless, for which she has already apologized.
Am I missing something?
Anonymous wrote:I travel with my 3yo by metro every day and feel guilty about discreetly feeding him snacks, but now plan to just do it in the open. The rules are over.
Anonymous wrote:Her tweet just seemed mean-spirited and vindictive. Yes, the employee was eating on the train, but is it necessary to report her to her boss and try to get her fired? How would that help or serve anyone?
I don’t blame her publishers for declining to associate with someone like that. No one is obligated to publish her work. She should have just sat there and looked at her phone.
Anonymous wrote:PSA:
Metro workers are NOT low wage workers. jobs at Metro are great jobs for often low/unskilled workers.