Anonymous wrote:If DC is willing to commit early decision, Penn or Cornell may be possibilities. With good recs, essays, and ECs, DC could probably get into 1-2 of the following: Northwestern, Duke, Chicago, Vanderbilt, Rice, Wash U, Emory, USC, Georgetown, Michigan, or any number of Top 10 SLACs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
An A minus average at a Big 3 is hardly a “mediocre GPA.” If the courseload is mostly advanced/AP-level classes like Physics C, Calculus, etc (however the most challenging classes are designated at that particular school) then UVA and W&M are most definitely within reach.
OP, it may also be deceiving in how you calculate top 25% at a school that does not weight or calculate rank. Is that based solely on GPA? The kid with a 3.8 who took all easy classes might be considered by some to be ranked in a higher percentile than the kid with a 3.65 in the most challenging classes, but colleges won’t see it that way.
So drop all that money on a private school to be “within reach” of two state colleges that would have been within reach or sure things from any random public high school in VA?
PP here. The point wasn't that UVA and W&M are the best DC could do, it was that the earlier poster who tried to say these were out of reach is completely nuts. If a kid is taking the most challenging classes at a big 3 and has an A minus average, that is not "poor performance" or "mediocre" grades. Anyone who says that and starts talking about schools like JMU has no idea what they are talking about. This kid is totally within range at sold schools like Tufts, Middlebury, Bowdoin, Wesleyan, Carleton, Haverford, Boston College, Colby, etc. Probably even good odds at Georgetown, Michigan, Emory, WUSTL, Rice. If in Virginia, UVA and W&M would likely be safeties, IF the 3.65 is in challenging classes.
Anonymous wrote:
An A minus average at a Big 3 is hardly a “mediocre GPA.” If the courseload is mostly advanced/AP-level classes like Physics C, Calculus, etc (however the most challenging classes are designated at that particular school) then UVA and W&M are most definitely within reach.
OP, it may also be deceiving in how you calculate top 25% at a school that does not weight or calculate rank. Is that based solely on GPA? The kid with a 3.8 who took all easy classes might be considered by some to be ranked in a higher percentile than the kid with a 3.65 in the most challenging classes, but colleges won’t see it that way.
So drop all that money on a private school to be “within reach” of two state colleges that would have been within reach or sure things from any random public high school in VA?
Anonymous wrote:If in Virginia, JMU and maybe Virginia Tech would be good options. UVA probably out of reach, likely W&M too. UMCP might be option if scores high enough and not OOS.
That mediocre GPA is a killer. But JMU is terrific.
Anonymous wrote:An A minus average at a Big 3 is hardly a “mediocre GPA.” If the courseload is mostly advanced/AP-level classes like Physics C, Calculus, etc (however the most challenging classes are designated at that particular school) then UVA and W&M are most definitely within reach.
OP, it may also be deceiving in how you calculate top 25% at a school that does not weight or calculate rank. Is that based solely on GPA? The kid with a 3.8 who took all easy classes might be considered by some to be ranked in a higher percentile than the kid with a 3.65 in the most challenging classes, but colleges won’t see it that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard from one admissions person (not an elite school) that they are very cautious with kids who have strong test scores but lower grades. She said it means the kid can do better than they are. She said they try to find out what is holding the kid back (lack of motivation? effort? distractions?) I am not accusing your child of any of those things. Just saying this person said they considered that combination riskier than the alternative (i.e. high grades, low test scores). Because the latter kids has figured out some formula for succeeding academically.
I thought this kid was in the top 25% of his/her private school class. And the top 15% are probably going to Ivies, so this is just a notch below. Seems like this is hardly cause for concern and colleges should be familiar with the grading profile of the Big 3 schools.
OP you just need to listen to the college counselor.
Anonymous wrote:I heard from one admissions person (not an elite school) that they are very cautious with kids who have strong test scores but lower grades. She said it means the kid can do better than they are. She said they try to find out what is holding the kid back (lack of motivation? effort? distractions?) I am not accusing your child of any of those things. Just saying this person said they considered that combination riskier than the alternative (i.e. high grades, low test scores). Because the latter kids has figured out some formula for succeeding academically.