Anonymous wrote:I think she’s really cute. Her looks are a combo of of queen Elizabeth and Catherine.
I don’t know why we would expect someone down the line of English Queens, Kings, and all that history to ALSO be an actual model. Wouldn’t that be a genetic lottery!!
(Btw I hate autocorrect. Proof: when I typed Kings— and just now again— it changed it multiple times to Kong’s)
Anonymous wrote:Just because kids are famous or in this case royal doesn't make them beautiful (to the poster that said she'll be a beauty). She's an average looking child. I see children out and about every day who are much more attractive. The pictures are nice and simple though, I appreciate celebrity children who are not airbrushed and styled to within an inch of their lives in photos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:diana had big eyes, which was a big part of her appeal. charlotte has beady hooded eyes. louis does look very much like kate.
NP Wow! Did you just insult a four year old? Beady eyes? Let's see your pictures at age four, wanna share so we can pick you apart?
I think all the children are adorable! And just because William doesn't have hair doesn't mean he lost his looks.
William completely lost his looks and will soon look like his father who is one of the ugliest men on earth.
Anonymous wrote:Re: photo up thread - wow, is Charles really that short?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:diana had big eyes, which was a big part of her appeal. charlotte has beady hooded eyes. louis does look very much like kate.
NP Wow! Did you just insult a four year old? Beady eyes? Let's see your pictures at age four, wanna share so we can pick you apart?
I think all the children are adorable! And just because William doesn't have hair doesn't mean he lost his looks.
William completely lost his looks and will soon look like his father who is one of the ugliest men on earth.
Prince Charles actually looks better than William to be honest and he is 30 years his senior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:diana had big eyes, which was a big part of her appeal. charlotte has beady hooded eyes. louis does look very much like kate.
NP Wow! Did you just insult a four year old? Beady eyes? Let's see your pictures at age four, wanna share so we can pick you apart?
I think all the children are adorable! And just because William doesn't have hair doesn't mean he lost his looks.
William completely lost his looks and will soon look like his father who is one of the ugliest men on earth.
Prince Charles actually looks better than William to be honest and he is 30 years his senior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:diana had big eyes, which was a big part of her appeal. charlotte has beady hooded eyes. louis does look very much like kate.
NP Wow! Did you just insult a four year old? Beady eyes? Let's see your pictures at age four, wanna share so we can pick you apart?
I think all the children are adorable! And just because William doesn't have hair doesn't mean he lost his looks.
William completely lost his looks and will soon look like his father who is one of the ugliest men on earth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:diana had big eyes, which was a big part of her appeal. charlotte has beady hooded eyes. louis does look very much like kate.
NP Wow! Did you just insult a four year old? Beady eyes? Let's see your pictures at age four, wanna share so we can pick you apart?
I think all the children are adorable! And just because William doesn't have hair doesn't mean he lost his looks.