Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
+2 I don't like the enormous house on the small lot. And they all look the same inside.
Except that most posters who spew this kind of crap 1.) will never live in a new home and 2.) do their own shoddy DIY for their add-ons. Which is fine, but don't hate on what you can't have, just because you can't have it.
Incorrect. Some of us don't want it even though we can afford it. I need a yard.
Always with the "you're just jealous". Lamest possible response to someone disagreeing with you.
+1 We bought a more expensive house that had a tasteful smaller home and a beautiful yard instead of a huge ugly newer home with no backyard. We have kids, and one of the big benefits of living in the suburbs is for them to have room to run around outside.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
+2 I don't like the enormous house on the small lot. And they all look the same inside.
Except that most posters who spew this kind of crap 1.) will never live in a new home and 2.) do their own shoddy DIY for their add-ons. Which is fine, but don't hate on what you can't have, just because you can't have it.
Incorrect. Some of us don't want it even though we can afford it. I need a yard.
Always with the "you're just jealous". Lamest possible response to someone disagreeing with you.
+1 We bought a more expensive house that had a tasteful smaller home and a beautiful yard instead of a huge ugly newer home with no backyard. We have kids, and one of the big benefits of living in the suburbs is for them to have room to run around outside.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
+2 I don't like the enormous house on the small lot. And they all look the same inside.
Except that most posters who spew this kind of crap 1.) will never live in a new home and 2.) do their own shoddy DIY for their add-ons. Which is fine, but don't hate on what you can't have, just because you can't have it.
Incorrect. Some of us don't want it even though we can afford it. I need a yard.
Always with the "you're just jealous". Lamest possible response to someone disagreeing with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
+2 I don't like the enormous house on the small lot. And they all look the same inside.
Except that most posters who spew this kind of crap 1.) will never live in a new home and 2.) do their own shoddy DIY for their add-ons. Which is fine, but don't hate on what you can't have, just because you can't have it.
Incorrect. Some of us don't want it even though we can afford it. I need a yard.
Always with the "you're just jealous". Lamest possible response to someone disagreeing with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they can’t afford them.
+1
Done. And done.
This doesn't make sense to me because aren't they mostly cheaper?
Like within a certain location maybe an infill new house would be more expensive, but most new construction is farther out on cheaper land, and most new construction is surrounded by other new construction.
I suspect the actual bricks and mortar of housing goes through a price curve where it's most expensive when it's new to 10 years and then it drops for 10 - maybe 40 and then it is likely to be torn down or renovated. But I'm sure it's impossible to separate that effect from general appreciation and swings in neighborhood desirability.
+1 Location. Location. Location. Anything else is secondary.
Not for everyone. I need to love the house first. I live and sleep in the house. Can't live in a shithole house just to be close to some strip mall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
+2 I don't like the enormous house on the small lot. And they all look the same inside.
Except that most posters who spew this kind of crap 1.) will never live in a new home and 2.) do their own shoddy DIY for their add-ons. Which is fine, but don't hate on what you can't have, just because you can't have it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they can’t afford them.
+1
Done. And done.
This doesn't make sense to me because aren't they mostly cheaper?
Like within a certain location maybe an infill new house would be more expensive, but most new construction is farther out on cheaper land, and most new construction is surrounded by other new construction.
I suspect the actual bricks and mortar of housing goes through a price curve where it's most expensive when it's new to 10 years and then it drops for 10 - maybe 40 and then it is likely to be torn down or renovated. But I'm sure it's impossible to separate that effect from general appreciation and swings in neighborhood desirability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
+2 I don't like the enormous house on the small lot. And they all look the same inside.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of them are cheaply and quickly built monstrosities? If you can afford a truly custom home - from the site work to the planning and design to the finishes - more power to you. But I was appalled at the sloppy site prep and poor quality of the new build neighborhoods we toured...not to mention the fact that they all seemed to prioritize square footage over livable design or *gasp* a yard...
+1 All the new builds I see look the same. Big, ugly McCraftsmans in the same shade of blue with the smallest possible lawn. It's like people who buy those homes fear greenery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they can’t afford them.
+1
Done. And done.
This doesn't make sense to me because aren't they mostly cheaper?
Like within a certain location maybe an infill new house would be more expensive, but most new construction is farther out on cheaper land, and most new construction is surrounded by other new construction.
I suspect the actual bricks and mortar of housing goes through a price curve where it's most expensive when it's new to 10 years and then it drops for 10 - maybe 40 and then it is likely to be torn down or renovated. But I'm sure it's impossible to separate that effect from general appreciation and swings in neighborhood desirability.
+1 Location. Location. Location. Anything else is secondary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they can’t afford them.
+1
Done. And done.
This doesn't make sense to me because aren't they mostly cheaper?
Like within a certain location maybe an infill new house would be more expensive, but most new construction is farther out on cheaper land, and most new construction is surrounded by other new construction.
I suspect the actual bricks and mortar of housing goes through a price curve where it's most expensive when it's new to 10 years and then it drops for 10 - maybe 40 and then it is likely to be torn down or renovated. But I'm sure it's impossible to separate that effect from general appreciation and swings in neighborhood desirability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they can’t afford them.
+1
Done. And done.