Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This entire thread is embarrassing for Middlebury. It seems like there are 10 year olds on here
Middlebury is blameless in all of this. It's the nasty posters that are the embarrassment.
Anonymous wrote:This entire thread is embarrassing for Middlebury. It seems like there are 10 year olds on here
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love how everyone is like
"It is a great school!"
But the median salary 12 years after college is $62K a year.
Um, no. You don't pay full pay for a college like that. How is this even a question.
Because not everyone is so concerned with ROI, but rather the quality of education the kid receives. Some get this, some don't.
You mean privileged white people?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love how everyone is like
"It is a great school!"
But the median salary 12 years after college is $62K a year.
Um, no. You don't pay full pay for a college like that. How is this even a question.
Because not everyone is so concerned with ROI, but rather the quality of education the kid receives. Some get this, some don't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's assume your combined income is $300K and you don't qualify for much aid, if any.
Why would you send your child to a preppy, white SLAC near the Canadian border?
23% of students come from families in the top 1%. Meanwhile, the median income for alumni at age 34 is a paltry $62K. How much value are you getting out of that $55K/year tuition? Obviously they are known for teaching and language programs, but does the tuition, isolation and limited career earnings potential justify the exorbitant cost?
That's the college where student mobs harassed a lady speaker a couple years ago?
Thanks but no thanks.
I love when stupid googles stuff then reports back here. He’s so dumb it’s fun! Write something dumb again, in that terrible writing of yours. I love it.
Hopefully not all Middlebury alumni are as dumb as you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To each their own. People spend Middlebury tuition for high school, then go into state university.
K-12 education is laying your life's foundation, it is substantially more important than college (especially if you're splitting hairs of SLAC vs top public U). Kids are pretty baked in the cake by college, if we're being honest with ourselves.
+1
I do agree with you.
But, if we’re talking the DC area? Northern Va and Montgomery public’s are fantastic. The private schools are around here sell prestige, not a “better” education. We’re not in the boonies.
Huh. I sent one kid to MoCo W school and one to a private HS (not a "Big 3" but a well-regarded one) and the difference was night and day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's assume your combined income is $300K and you don't qualify for much aid, if any.
Why would you send your child to a preppy, white SLAC near the Canadian border?
23% of students come from families in the top 1%. Meanwhile, the median income for alumni at age 34 is a paltry $62K. How much value are you getting out of that $55K/year tuition? Obviously they are known for teaching and language programs, but does the tuition, isolation and limited career earnings potential justify the exorbitant cost?
That's the college where student mobs harassed a lady speaker a couple years ago?
Thanks but no thanks.
I love when stupid googles stuff then reports back here. He’s so dumb it’s fun! Write something dumb again, in that terrible writing of yours. I love it.