Anonymous wrote:IQ means nothing! have we not figured this out yet?
I'll take my very high EQ over my very average IQ any day. I really do mean that.
Anonymous wrote:IQ means nothing! have we not figured this out yet?
I'll take my very high EQ over my very average IQ any day. I really do mean that.
Anonymous wrote:Being bilingual boosts your iq. The constant switching between languages and cultural know how
It is a pity esol classes and high esol schools have so little resources
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would guess that my DD's very lovely preschool teachers probably have IQs right around 100. They are very good preschool teachers, but it's a profession where EQ is much more important than IQ.
This info seems to be typical for that profession. I personally chose to have my infant/preschooler spend days with someone with an IQ over 130 to give them the best possible advantage. Me.
Ridiculous. I don’t know my IQ, but on the LSAT, my score was in the 99th%, so I would guess it is over 100. Preschool teachers absolutely do a better job at nurturing and teaching 3-4 year olds than I would. My kids didn’t really benefit from me quitting my high paying job and staying home (I did). Intelligence is highly heritable and having a small child around a jerk like you all day is damaging.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of my students have IQs in the 70s and low 80s yet they don’t qualify for IEPs even though they struggle.
Because that's not how IEPs work. They must show a processing deficit or a discrepancy in a specific area.
Oh I know! Every year, these same students are brought up to SST but there is nothing we can do for them. They are not making the expected progress because they are working to their potential. Most of them seem slow to very slow. I feel bad for them. It often runs in their families especially along the female/male divide. We just got testing done for a student and her IQ scores were just as low as her sister. Their brother seems to have an average IQ because he learns at an average rate. The two girls don't qualify for an IEP though. They are working to their potential but God forbid anyone brings that up at these meetings. Why test them if we aren't going to acknowledge the elephant in the room. They just aren't that bright. They are very nice kids though so I'll take them over some entitled, rude students in my class who are smarter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all these people who know their IQs? I have never had a reason or desire to be tested.
I wonder the same. No one know their IQ in my family except my son because he has ADHD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of my students have IQs in the 70s and low 80s yet they don’t qualify for IEPs even though they struggle.
Because that's not how IEPs work. They must show a processing deficit or a discrepancy in a specific area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this whole thread but DCUM has one of the wealthiest readerships on the web. Wealth of course doesn't necessarily mean intelligence but there is certainly a link (in order to acquire and hold on to money, most people need some intelligence) so there is a skewed population here.
I have an IQ of like 135-140 and I come from a VERY smart family. My mom is crazy smart. And my husband also comes from VERY smart parents. So have smart kids and most of our family is smart. Do I think everyone is smart because I'm around smart people? That would just be confirmation bias. I think the answer is simply that this is a website smart people gravitate towards therefore a disproportionate sample size.
Not only what you said but also I think a lot of somewhat slower people get very discouraged and offended when they get snarky but honest answers to their naive questions here. Survival of the fittest on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would guess that my DD's very lovely preschool teachers probably have IQs right around 100. They are very good preschool teachers, but it's a profession where EQ is much more important than IQ.
This info seems to be typical for that profession. I personally chose to have my infant/preschooler spend days with someone with an IQ over 130 to give them the best possible advantage. Me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would guess that my DD's very lovely preschool teachers probably have IQs right around 100. They are very good preschool teachers, but it's a profession where EQ is much more important than IQ.
This info seems to be typical for that profession. I personally chose to have my infant/preschooler spend days with someone with an IQ over 130 to give them the best possible advantage. Me.
So they can be a smart a$$hole?
Yes, that's it, because all SAHM who love caring for their own kids raise assholes. WOH mom wins!
Not all SAHM's are a$$holes, you just sound like one.... and not that smart either.... low EQ for sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this whole thread but DCUM has one of the wealthiest readerships on the web. Wealth of course doesn't necessarily mean intelligence but there is certainly a link (in order to acquire and hold on to money, most people need some intelligence) so there is a skewed population here.
I have an IQ of like 135-140 and I come from a VERY smart family. My mom is crazy smart. And my husband also comes from VERY smart parents. So have smart kids and most of our family is smart. Do I think everyone is smart because I'm around smart people? That would just be confirmation bias. I think the answer is simply that this is a website smart people gravitate towards therefore a disproportionate sample size.
or maybe people with high IQs are not that nice/have low EQ... as you can see from this website and people with low IQ are nicer, have higher EQs and don't enjoy mean people so they stay away.