Anonymous
Post 04/28/2019 00:19     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We used to call them androgynous. There was a whole CK campaign, and a fragrance.



Yes, but looking androgynous was just an aesthetic. They weren't denying that they were actually women.


Not true. They just weren’t telling you.
Anonymous
Post 04/28/2019 00:14     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:We used to call them androgynous. There was a whole CK campaign, and a fragrance.



Yes, but looking androgynous was just an aesthetic. They weren't denying that they were actually women.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2019 13:37     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes observations are biased by what you find uncomfortable. I really can’t think of a single reason I’d need to know what you asked, OP. Even if 99.9% of non-binary teens were assigned female at birth, how does it matter?


People aren't "assigned" male or female at birth, any more than they are "assigned" ten fingers and ten toes.



Ever look at a birth certificate?

Until recently, only M or F was allowed and a judgment was made based on external genitalia, even if ambiguous.


Gender is observed at birth, not assigned.


Sex is observed at birth. Gender is a construct.


+1.

You cannot really change sex, but you can change gender as many times as you want.

#ScientificFact
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2019 12:35     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Well non-binary doesn’t exist so...
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2019 08:55     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes observations are biased by what you find uncomfortable. I really can’t think of a single reason I’d need to know what you asked, OP. Even if 99.9% of non-binary teens were assigned female at birth, how does it matter?


People aren't "assigned" male or female at birth, any more than they are "assigned" ten fingers and ten toes.



Ever look at a birth certificate?

Until recently, only M or F was allowed and a judgment was made based on external genitalia, even if ambiguous.


Gender is observed at birth, not assigned.


Sex is observed at birth. Gender is a construct.


And even sex is legally determined at the point in a visual generalization that may not match chromosomes. Over this many cm is a penis. Under is a clitoris.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2019 08:49     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes observations are biased by what you find uncomfortable. I really can’t think of a single reason I’d need to know what you asked, OP. Even if 99.9% of non-binary teens were assigned female at birth, how does it matter?


People aren't "assigned" male or female at birth, any more than they are "assigned" ten fingers and ten toes.



Ever look at a birth certificate?

Until recently, only M or F was allowed and a judgment was made based on external genitalia, even if ambiguous.


Gender is observed at birth, not assigned.


Sex is observed at birth. Gender is a construct.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2019 22:23     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

We used to call them androgynous. There was a whole CK campaign, and a fragrance.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2019 22:16     Subject: Re:Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is a binary person?


One who is not non-binary.


I love you.


I kinda love you too.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2019 21:57     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:Because in some ways it still sucks to be female in this society -- you get judged a lot more on your appearance, your behavior is more strictly regulated by parents, a spouse, etc; you are less well respected often by your boss, etc. You get paid less, you have to do all the housework in many cultures.

I think that a lot of thinking you're male may be about wanting to experience male privilege on some level. What's sad is the idea that boys think you have to "be a girl" to experiment with hair, makeup, clothes, and women may think you have to 'be a boy' in order to experience being powerful, successful and respected. What needs to change isn't your gender but these ridiculous gender norms.


Thank you.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2019 09:39     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:What is non-binary?


OK - if you really don't know, a non-binary person does not feel comfortable identifying as either one of the two (hence, "binary") traditional genders: male and female.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2019 21:40     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes observations are biased by what you find uncomfortable. I really can’t think of a single reason I’d need to know what you asked, OP. Even if 99.9% of non-binary teens were assigned female at birth, how does it matter?


People aren't "assigned" male or female at birth, any more than they are "assigned" ten fingers and ten toes.



Ever look at a birth certificate?

Until recently, only M or F was allowed and a judgment was made based on external genitalia, even if ambiguous.


Gender is observed at birth, not assigned.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2019 21:14     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes observations are biased by what you find uncomfortable. I really can’t think of a single reason I’d need to know what you asked, OP. Even if 99.9% of non-binary teens were assigned female at birth, how does it matter?


People aren't "assigned" male or female at birth, any more than they are "assigned" ten fingers and ten toes.



Ever look at a birth certificate?

Until recently, only M or F was allowed and a judgment was made based on external genitalia, even if ambiguous.
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2019 19:29     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:Sometimes observations are biased by what you find uncomfortable. I really can’t think of a single reason I’d need to know what you asked, OP. Even if 99.9% of non-binary teens were assigned female at birth, how does it matter?


People aren't "assigned" male or female at birth, any more than they are "assigned" ten fingers and ten toes.

Anonymous
Post 03/30/2019 17:12     Subject: Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Sometimes observations are biased by what you find uncomfortable. I really can’t think of a single reason I’d need to know what you asked, OP. Even if 99.9% of non-binary teens were assigned female at birth, how does it matter?
Anonymous
Post 03/30/2019 17:08     Subject: Re:Why are the overwhelming number of non-binary people biologically female?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is a binary person?


One who is not non-binary.


I love you.