Anonymous wrote:Two more coaches have resigned mid season at LMVSC... and 3 others confirmed by the end of the season.
Anonymous wrote:Lets take a pole (pause) how many think LMVSC will be around after next year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am a current coach that will use this cowardly medium to say, the issue has never been the money, it's been the toxic environment the Executive Director creates. That's the true reason coaches are leaving and will continue to leave.
Why would a coach have to deal with the Executive Director? Shouldn't the environment be set by TD, DOC, Age Group Director, as well as the constant work/communication you do be with them and not with the ED.
Because she is up in everyone's business micromanaging coaches. (not the coach poster)
That should not be the role of the ED. Saw the letter and it looks like they may be making changes to the structure as it is so that may allow her to focus on other things and allow others to do their job.
Is this since the TD left? Are you saying that's why the TD left?
They need a legend now as TD
With SYC at CCL and all
I think OP/coach is saying that is why TD left, because of the environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am a current coach that will use this cowardly medium to say, the issue has never been the money, it's been the toxic environment the Executive Director creates. That's the true reason coaches are leaving and will continue to leave.
Why would a coach have to deal with the Executive Director? Shouldn't the environment be set by TD, DOC, Age Group Director, as well as the constant work/communication you do be with them and not with the ED.
Because she is up in everyone's business micromanaging coaches. (not the coach poster)
That should not be the role of the ED. Saw the letter and it looks like they may be making changes to the structure as it is so that may allow her to focus on other things and allow others to do their job.
Is this since the TD left? Are you saying that's why the TD left?
They need a legend now as TD
With SYC at CCL and all
I think OP/coach is saying that is why TD left, because of the environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am a current coach that will use this cowardly medium to say, the issue has never been the money, it's been the toxic environment the Executive Director creates. That's the true reason coaches are leaving and will continue to leave.
Why would a coach have to deal with the Executive Director? Shouldn't the environment be set by TD, DOC, Age Group Director, as well as the constant work/communication you do be with them and not with the ED.
Because she is up in everyone's business micromanaging coaches. (not the coach poster)
That should not be the role of the ED. Saw the letter and it looks like they may be making changes to the structure as it is so that may allow her to focus on other things and allow others to do their job.
Is this since the TD left? Are you saying that's why the TD left?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am a current coach that will use this cowardly medium to say, the issue has never been the money, it's been the toxic environment the Executive Director creates. That's the true reason coaches are leaving and will continue to leave.
Why would a coach have to deal with the Executive Director? Shouldn't the environment be set by TD, DOC, Age Group Director, as well as the constant work/communication you do be with them and not with the ED.
Because she is up in everyone's business micromanaging coaches. (not the coach poster)
That should not be the role of the ED. Saw the letter and it looks like they may be making changes to the structure as it is so that may allow her to focus on other things and allow others to do their job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what's going on with the LMVSC TD? I saw the announcement and then nothing.
LMVSC "announced" TD's grandmother died, so he declined the job. They knew he couldn't commit early but they were desperate to find someone ASAP and announced it early. He got cold feet and decided not to move across country. I'm sure the pay wasn't' worth it. I hear the club's ownership is pretty cheap with their staff. (Hens, top tear coaches continuously leave the club)
The club survives off players on "scholarships"/ financial aid and I'm sure it will continue to do so!
I am a current coach that will use this cowardly medium to say, the issue has never been the money, it's been the toxic environment the Executive Director creates. That's the true reason coaches are leaving and will continue to leave.
Why would a coach have to deal with the Executive Director? Shouldn't the environment be set by TD, DOC, Age Group Director, as well as the constant work/communication you do be with them and not with the ED.
Because she is up in everyone's business micromanaging coaches. (not the coach poster)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what's going on with the LMVSC TD? I saw the announcement and then nothing.
LMVSC "announced" TD's grandmother died, so he declined the job. They knew he couldn't commit early but they were desperate to find someone ASAP and announced it early. He got cold feet and decided not to move across country. I'm sure the pay wasn't' worth it. I hear the club's ownership is pretty cheap with their staff. (Hens, top tear coaches continuously leave the club)
The club survives off players on "scholarships"/ financial aid and I'm sure it will continue to do so!
I am a current coach that will use this cowardly medium to say, the issue has never been the money, it's been the toxic environment the Executive Director creates. That's the true reason coaches are leaving and will continue to leave.
Why would a coach have to deal with the Executive Director? Shouldn't the environment be set by TD, DOC, Age Group Director, as well as the constant work/communication you do be with them and not with the ED.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what's going on with the LMVSC TD? I saw the announcement and then nothing.
LMVSC "announced" TD's grandmother died, so he declined the job. They knew he couldn't commit early but they were desperate to find someone ASAP and announced it early. He got cold feet and decided not to move across country. I'm sure the pay wasn't' worth it. I hear the club's ownership is pretty cheap with their staff. (Hens, top tear coaches continuously leave the club)
The club survives off players on "scholarships"/ financial aid and I'm sure it will continue to do so!
I am a current coach that will use this cowardly medium to say, the issue has never been the money, it's been the toxic environment the Executive Director creates. That's the true reason coaches are leaving and will continue to leave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what's going on with the LMVSC TD? I saw the announcement and then nothing.
LMVSC "announced" TD's grandmother died, so he declined the job. They knew he couldn't commit early but they were desperate to find someone ASAP and announced it early. He got cold feet and decided not to move across country. I'm sure the pay wasn't' worth it. I hear the club's ownership is pretty cheap with their staff. (Hens, top tear coaches continuously leave the club)
The club survives off players on "scholarships"/ financial aid and I'm sure it will continue to do so!