Anonymous wrote:Skidmore
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I got into Stony Brook a million years ago with a 78 average and 990 on the SAT. Today my nephew applied and you have to be a rocket scientist.
Easy big fella! Fewer than half of entrants are from top decile of their HS class. Good school and no dummies allowed but scores and grades aren’t exactly rocket scientists.
Anonymous wrote:I got into Stony Brook a million years ago with a 78 average and 990 on the SAT. Today my nephew applied and you have to be a rocket scientist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oberlin
Not true based on what I could find. There were years in the 90's that it was over 60% admitted and now it's pretty consistent in the 20s or 30s.
Oberlin is also one of the self-selecting schools. It's not just for bookworms. Because of its Conservatory, Oberlin tends to attract artistic kids. It's one thing to study 24/7, cram through prep schools, and have high stats. It's high stats plus artistic accomplishments.
It certainly is self selective now that it has a reputation as a Snowflake Academy.
It's self-selecting cuz it also attracts those who absolutely oppose ultra alt-right types, those who believe we are all One. Trumpsters tend to apply to Trump U or the U of Penn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oberlin
Not true based on what I could find. There were years in the 90's that it was over 60% admitted and now it's pretty consistent in the 20s or 30s.
Oberlin is also one of the self-selecting schools. It's not just for bookworms. Because of its Conservatory, Oberlin tends to attract artistic kids. It's one thing to study 24/7, cram through prep schools, and have high stats. It's high stats plus artistic accomplishments.
It certainly is self selective now that it has a reputation as a Snowflake Academy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oberlin
Not true based on what I could find. There were years in the 90's that it was over 60% admitted and now it's pretty consistent in the 20s or 30s.
Oberlin is also one of the self-selecting schools. It's not just for bookworms. Because of its Conservatory, Oberlin tends to attract artistic kids. It's one thing to study 24/7, cram through prep schools, and have high stats. It's high stats plus artistic accomplishments.
It certainly is self selective now that it has a reputation as a Snowflake Academy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trinity in Hartford.
Acceptance rate
2010 - 41%
2013 - 34%
2015 - 33%
2018 - 34%
Sorry, but wrong.
Dead wrong. Read the article from 1995, when the acceptance rate was roughly 50% and they talk about Colby and Bates being lesser schools (true). Trinity is getting killed by the location and CT's inability to fix the squalor of West Hartford.
https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-1995-04-03-9504030045-story.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oberlin
Not true based on what I could find. There were years in the 90's that it was over 60% admitted and now it's pretty consistent in the 20s or 30s.
Oberlin is also one of the self-selecting schools. It's not just for bookworms. Because of its Conservatory, Oberlin tends to attract artistic kids. It's one thing to study 24/7, cram through prep schools, and have high stats. It's high stats plus artistic accomplishments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oberlin
Not true based on what I could find. There were years in the 90's that it was over 60% admitted and now it's pretty consistent in the 20s or 30s.
Anonymous wrote:PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: YOU CANNOT LOOK SOLELY AT ACCEPTANCE RATES TO DETERMINE HOW HARD IT IS TO GET INTO A PARTICULAR COLLEGE; IT IS NOT REALLY A VALID MEASURE OF HOW SELECTIVE THE INSTITUTION IS.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the majority of schools outside the top 20, the best tool for looking at selectivity is to look at three: the 25th-75th percentile of test scores, mean GPA and acceptance rate. Each of these can be gamed, but acceptance rate is the most in the college's control and most gamed.
Yes, but when speaking of a school and it's own historical selectivity, which is the premise of the thread, it is a far worse tool as standardized testing baselines have been reset so many times it is massively misleading.
The OP was clearly asking about schools whose acceptance rates are increasing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Penn State
Occidental
JMU
Definitely not JMU. I grew up here and it's become much harder to get into.
No, it hasn't. 25 years ago the acceptance rate was in the 30s, now it's 70%. That's partly because they have more students.
Anonymous wrote:For the majority of schools outside the top 20, the best tool for looking at selectivity is to look at three: the 25th-75th percentile of test scores, mean GPA and acceptance rate. Each of these can be gamed, but acceptance rate is the most in the college's control and most gamed.