Anonymous
03/05/2019 23:15
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
+2
Asked and answered. Next!
Anonymous
03/05/2019 23:10
Subject: Re:Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Nice try, OP.
Care to try again? On second thought, please don't. You'll just embarrass yourself again.
Not sure what you're getting at. Is it the NYT or Washington Post you have an issue with? Because both sources published similar articles on this crisis. You clearly just don't want to hear it, so maybe a letter to the editor(s) is in order?
Anonymous
03/05/2019 23:08
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
+2
Anonymous
03/05/2019 23:08
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:^^^. I stand corrected. Stable geniuses who completely understand the concept of linking a source, instead of dropping huge blocks of texts.
Only the Best!
Those who have zero intelligent rebuttals always tend to try and weasel out of it by attempting to be witty. It's not working for you.
-DP
Anonymous
03/05/2019 23:07
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not just medical, but we pay for the processing, court cases, housing, etc. of all these people.
We need a wall.
none of the people in the article are here illegally. a wall doesn't address the issue.
They crossed illegally. A wall is needed.
More importantly a safe third country agreement with Mexico is needed so we can send these people right back.
+1
+2
Still can't comprehend why the U.S. is left footing the bill for the care of these people - especially their medical care, as so many of them are terribly sick when they arrive on our soil. Where is Mexico's responsibility in all of this?
Anonymous
03/05/2019 23:04
Subject: Re:Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I cannot understand how our Democratic members of Congress cannot admit that we are at a crisis level. What will it take?
And, I saw a report recently that said the number of illegal immigrants in our country is sorely underestimated. It is likely it is doubled what has been estimated.
Anyone who says this isn't a crisis is not living in reality.
The number of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. could be double what the generally accepted estimate is, according to a study released Friday by researchers from Yale University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The U.S. government and most groups put the number of undocumented immigrants at around 11 million to 12 million, but researchers from Yale and MIT give a “conservative” number of 16. 7 million in 2016 and an average of 22 million, according to Yale Insights.
Bloomberg reported the study could validate claims made by President Trump that the real number on undocumented immigrants in the country is as high as 30 million and could offer ammunition for the president and immigration critics to take a harder stance on the issue.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/number-of-illegal-immigrants-in-us-may-be-twice-whats-reported-yale-mit-study
And anyone who cites Faux News on immigration is immediately discounted. Bye bye.
Screw you.
The actual study - by Yale - was linked in the article. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201193
Happy reading, jerk.
It's ok. Clearly, the PPP is unable to decipher big words and graphics. Not surprised at all.
Anonymous
03/05/2019 22:44
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
There was $25billion in border security funding that was offered just this past December. Trump turned it down. Instead he opted for about $5bil. Not sure how that helps the border situation.
Exactly. Why is Trump not serious about border security? He seems more interested in using immigration as a wedge issue for the election than in any meaningful actions.
This. We need common sense immigration reform (guest worker program, better visa tracking (since that is the largest source of undocumented workers), DACA deal (with no amnesty for parents), common sense border security - especially at ports of entry) - not a wall.
Anonymous
03/05/2019 22:10
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
I wonder who was in complete control of Congress for the first two years of Trump's term.
60 votes in the Senate wasn't there.
Yep, even some Rs didn't want to fund the border wall.
Republicans only had 52 seats. They just didn't have he numbers. It was DEMOCRATS that didn't want to fund the border (shocking I know)
Republicans only needed 51 votes to pass a bill for border wall funding. Trump wouldn't have vetoed it. The Republicans have no excuse. Wasn't a "crisis" for them then and therefore can't legitimately be one now.
Anonymous
03/05/2019 22:08
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
I wonder who was in complete control of Congress for the first two years of Trump's term.
60 votes in the Senate wasn't there.
Yep, even some Rs didn't want to fund the border wall.
Republicans only had 52 seats. They just didn't have he numbers. It was DEMOCRATS that didn't want to fund the border (shocking I know)
Fake news. It wasn't a priority for the Rs either. No one wants Trump's idiotic wall except for the diehard MAGAts.
Anonymous
03/05/2019 22:00
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
I wonder who was in complete control of Congress for the first two years of Trump's term.
60 votes in the Senate wasn't there.
Yep, even some Rs didn't want to fund the border wall.
Republicans only had 52 seats. They just didn't have he numbers. It was DEMOCRATS that didn't want to fund the border (shocking I know)
Some Rs don't either.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/15/republicans-spent-two-years-resisting-trumps-border-wall-what-changed/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.49d0f8d931d8
In their two years in control of Congress, Republicans did not prioritize Trump’s border wall. They approved $1.6 billion for border security projects for fiscal 2018, but only a fraction of that was to be used for construction of a wall. They were willing to kick in another $1.6 billion for fiscal 2019, a fraction of what the project could ultimately cost.
Anonymous
03/05/2019 21:57
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
I wonder who was in complete control of Congress for the first two years of Trump's term.
60 votes in the Senate wasn't there.
Why would that be an issue? Needing 60 votes is only an issue when there is a threat of veto. The Republicans had what they needed, a simple majority.
Anonymous
03/05/2019 21:38
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
I wonder who was in complete control of Congress for the first two years of Trump's term.
60 votes in the Senate wasn't there.
Yep, even some Rs didn't want to fund the border wall.
Republicans only had 52 seats. They just didn't have he numbers. It was DEMOCRATS that didn't want to fund the border (shocking I know)
Anonymous
03/05/2019 21:35
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We didn't have any 76,000 migrants crossing a month crisis under Obama.
We should bring Obama back.
Obama's policies caused this influx. Word has gotten out that our laws are so screwed up that once they are in... they are good to go!
So during Obama's term, the numbers went down, but after he's been gone for two years, the numbers have gone up but it's still Obama's fault? Trumpian logic.
President Obama gave amnesty to DACA people. That sent the message back to Central America that we will take their kids and let them stay indefinitely.
Anonymous
03/05/2019 21:04
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
I wonder who was in complete control of Congress for the first two years of Trump's term.
60 votes in the Senate wasn't there.
Didn't Trump boast about being a great negotiator? What happened to the Art of the Deal?
Anonymous
03/05/2019 20:56
Subject: Border at ‘Breaking Point’ as More than 76,000 Migrants Cross in a Month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't the Trump administration hired more Border Patrol agents and immigration officials? Fiddling while Rome burns seems to be this administration's MO.
Why hasn't Congress passed a bill that would allow for more border barriers to discourage easy entry to our country?
Excellent question.
I wonder who was in complete control of Congress for the first two years of Trump's term.
60 votes in the Senate wasn't there.
Yep, even some Rs didn't want to fund the border wall.